Venezuela Empties Prisons, Sends Violent Criminals to U.S. Border, Says DHS Report

jct74

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
14,304
EXCLUSIVE: Venezuela Empties Prisons, Sends Violent Criminals to U.S. Border, Says DHS Report

RANDY CLARK
18 Sep 2022

A recent Department of Homeland Security intelligence report received by the Border Patrol instructs agents to look for Venezuelan inmates released from entering the U.S., according to a source within CBP. The report, reviewed by Breitbart Texas, indicates the Venezuelan government, under the leadership of Nicolás Maduro Moros, is purposely freeing inmates — including some convicted of murder, rape, and extortion.

The intelligence report warns agents the freed prisoners have been seen within migrant caravans traveling from Tapachula, Mexico toward the U.S.-Mexico border as recently as July. The source, not authorized to speak to the media, told Breitbart Texas the move is reminiscent of a similar action taken by Cuban dictator Fidel Castro during the Mariel boat lift in the 1980s.

The report does not state whether the released prison inmates were traveling as a cohesive group but does state it was commonly shared knowledge among migrants traveling to the United States within a caravan in July that many of the Venezuelan migrants in the group were convicts and included hardened criminals.

...

read more:
https://www.breitbart.com/border/20...nds-violent-criminals-to-u-s-says-dhs-report/
 
Don't worry. When they get here and drink our magic water, all immigrants turn into hard working, libertarian, family oriented folks who put all lazy Americans to shame.
 
Are you gonna chip in? :D

I think Provincetown should be the next town to be "diversified".

At 91.5 percent, it's much whiter than the Vineyard.

91.9 percent voted Biden in 2020.

And the entire state of Massachusetts is a immigrant invader sanctuary.
 
Last edited:
I think Provincetown should be the next town to be "diversified"

I'm splitting a gut over here, I just tried calling your ass :tears:

Joking aside, all of this bullsh|t needs to just STOP. Incentives passed by both sides, politicians [DeSantis] giving FREE transportation, mobilizing the Guard... man, this sh|t ever ain't going to stop, it's getting worse by the second!
 
I'm splitting a gut over here, I just tried calling your ass :tears:

Joking aside, all of this bullsh|t needs to just STOP. Incentives passed by both sides, politicians [DeSantis] giving FREE transportation, mobilizing the Guard... man, this sh|t ever ain't going to stop, it's getting worse by the second!

Oh yeah I see that...damn phone blocked it as spam...call ya back in the morning
 
Except unlike Jimmy Carter dementia man is going to end up with two terms. Whether he'll be able to survive all 4 years of the second term is yet to be determined.

Only if he runs against Trump. Anyone else would beat him.
 
Why is Maduro doing this?

Because he hates us for our freedoms? Because he's just plain evil? Because he's a totally irrational lunatic? Because he wants to go to war against the most powerful military in the world?

Or is it because over many years the US has intervened in his country, making him like a cornered animal with no recourse left but to attack?

Our government refuses to recognize Maduro as Venezuela's president. It actively supported a coup against his predecessor. It has imposed a variety of economic sanctions on his country. It has facilitated the active evacuation from his country of literally millions of people (out of a total population of under 30 million). There Maduro sits watching us remove from him the resources of his best people, and he decides, "Well, if they're going to do that, I might as well send some of the not-my-best-people along too, and make them America's problem to have to pay for and deal with instead of mine, since they're the reason I don't have the funds to imprison them."

His action is actually rational, and even defensible, given his circumstances.

This is blowback.

And yet some people think the solution is a bigger police state here in the US.

Every time we have a problem caused by big government, the solutions the government proposes, and unfortunately the solutions most voters support, are to impose even more big government, which will be bound to result in new unintended consequences that will only repeat the cycle.

When a problem is caused by big government, the solution is to cease and repeal the government actions that caused it, not to come up with even more.
 
Why is Maduro doing this?

Because he hates us for our freedoms? Because he's just plain evil? Because he's a totally irrational lunatic? Because he wants to go to war against the most powerful military in the world?

Of course it's rational.

That's what 5th Generation demographic warfare IS...rational.

But your solution is closing the barn door after the horse has escaped.

Even if we reversed our foreign policy position today, the invaders would not shrug their shoulders, and turn around and march back.

So what are you prepared to do about it now, other than nothing?
 
Of course it's rational.

That's what 5th Generation demographic warfare IS...rational.

But your solution is closing the barn door after the horse has escaped.

Even if we reversed our foreign policy position today, the invaders would not shrug their shoulders, and turn around and march back.

So what are you prepared to do about it now, other than nothing?

We can't undo what's done. But we can cut our losses.

I've heard that accusation before. "Your solution is doing nothing!" That's what the statists always say about every issue. In their minds, the notion of any progress ever being made that is not under the direction of the government just doesn't register. To them, you either want the government to solve a problem, or you are on the side of the enemy.

I won't waste time answering something as obviously wrong as that beyond saying that my solution is to prefer not making the problem worse over making it worse.
 
Why is Maduro doing this?

Because he hates us for our freedoms? Because he's just plain evil? Because he's a totally irrational lunatic? Because he wants to go to war against the most powerful military in the world?

Or is it because over many years the US has intervened in his country, making him like a cornered animal with no recourse left but to attack?

Our government refuses to recognize Maduro as Venezuela's president. It actively supported a coup against his predecessor. It has imposed a variety of economic sanctions on his country. It has facilitated the active evacuation from his country of literally millions of people (out of a total population of under 30 million). There Maduro sits watching us remove from him the resources of his best people, and he decides, "Well, if they're going to do that, I might as well send some of the not-my-best-people along too, and make them America's problem to have to pay for and deal with instead of mine, since they're the reason I don't have the funds to imprison them."

His action is actually rational, and even defensible, given his circumstances.

This is blowback.

And yet some people think the solution is a bigger police state here in the US.

Every time we have a problem caused by big government, the solutions the government proposes, and unfortunately the solutions most voters support, are to impose even more big government, which will be bound to result in new unintended consequences that will only repeat the cycle.

When a problem is caused by big government, the solution is to cease and repeal the government actions that caused it, not to come up with even more.


“You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Invisible Man again.”


We can't undo what's done. But we can cut our losses.

I've heard that accusation before. "Your solution is doing nothing!" That's what the statists always say about every issue. In their minds, the notion of any progress ever being made that is not under the direction of the government just doesn't register. To them, you either want the government to solve a problem, or you are on the side of the enemy.

I won't waste time answering something as obviously wrong as that beyond saying that my solution is to prefer not making the problem worse over making it worse.


“You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Invisible Man again.“
 
I've heard that accusation before. "Your solution is doing nothing!" That's what the statists always say about every issue. In their minds, the notion of any progress ever being made that is not under the direction of the government just doesn't register. To them, you either want the government to solve a problem, or you are on the side of the enemy.

I've heard it more times than I can count. "You want to eliminate the federal Department of Education? Why do you want children to go uneducated?"

I see Hegel beneath all of this. Problem, reaction, draconian solution. You want to do nothing? How is the government doing nothing at all not a huge improvement over what the government is doing now?
 
I've heard it more times than I can count. "You want to eliminate the federal Department of Education? Why do you want children to go uneducated?"

I see Hegel beneath all of this. Problem, reaction, draconian solution. You want to do nothing? How is the government doing nothing at all not a huge improvement over what the government is doing now?

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to acptulsa again."
 
We can't undo what's done. But we can cut our losses.

I've heard that accusation before. "Your solution is doing nothing!" That's what the statists always say about every issue. In their minds, the notion of any progress ever being made that is not under the direction of the government just doesn't register. To them, you either want the government to solve a problem, or you are on the side of the enemy.

I won't waste time answering something as obviously wrong as that beyond saying that my solution is to prefer not making the problem worse over making it worse.

Are you in favor of armed citizen militias taking up positions along the border and turning back the invaders?
 
Are you in favor of armed citizen militias taking up positions along the border and turning back the invaders?

If "invaders" refers to people engaged in violent acts with victims, then sure. But not just for peaceful people whose only crime is the victimless make believe crime of crossing a border without jumping through the hoops some politicians made up.

And if you ask how they're supposed to tell the peaceful ones from the violent ones, then the answer is by the same due process that needs to be applied to people who are already here when they're accused of any crime. They can't just engage in some kind of pre-crime enforcement or assume that people they see are guilty until proven innocent.
 
If "invaders" refers to people engaged in violent acts with victims, then sure. But not just for peaceful people whose only crime is the victimless make believe crime of crossing a border without jumping through the hoops some politicians made up.

And if you ask how they're supposed to tell the peaceful ones from the violent ones, then the answer is by the same due process that needs to be applied to people who are already here when they're accused of any crime. They can't just engage in some kind of pre-crime enforcement or assume that people they see are guilty until proven innocent.


"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Invisible Man again."
 
Back
Top