US rumored to be "going in on the ground" against Yemen

[Snowball]

there's a direct connection between Trump's rush for a deal in Ukraine/Russia (regardless of the intricacies and logistics which Russia is concerned with, and the instigations of Zelensky and the UK, France and Germany) --- and what is being planned in the ME.

And that timeline has a lot to do with Trump/Israel preferring Russia to be "out of the way" when something else goes down.

That "something else" will involve MULTIPLE states and groups in the ME.
-----------------
Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested the US was looking for Russian President Vladimir Putin to move forward with negotiations on talks with Ukraine more quickly.
“I think it was more an explanation of: This is our timeline, and at some point it will be clear whether you want peace or you don’t want peace. And that time is coming; it’s pretty short.” (see antiwar.com for article)

 

[TheTexan]

Might as well. I mean noone really cares its just Yemen

 

[PAF]

 

[69360]

Unlikely

 

[unknown]

The same way we're not in Ukraine.

 

[idiom]

Yemen should be the 52nd state and Saudi Arabia the 53rd and Gaza the 54th. And Iran the 55th.

This is so much better than having a war President.

 

[PAF]

Yemen should be the 52nd state and Saudi Arabia the 53rd and Gaza the 54th. And Iran the 55th.

This is so much better than having a war President.

Really this what they are working toward; a One World Government.

Klaus Schwab discussed "Regional Governance" in the new 4th Industrial "Technocratic Society".

Trump even "toyed" with mentioning Canada and Greenland, to get people used to the idea for down the road.

 

[69360]

The same way we're not in Ukraine.

There are already CIA and special forces just like Ukraine. That's a given. I meant you will not see conventional infantry on the ground in Yemen.

 

[Anti Globalist]

How about we have no boots on the ground and just bring all of our troops home?

 

[PAF]

How about we have no boots on the ground and just bring all of our troops home?

In exchange for cyber warfare, Space Force and AI?

I am for slashing - by a lot - military funding and keeping only what is necessary to defend - just in case.

 

[TheTexan]

keeping only what is necessary to defend - just in case.

If defense spending was actually defense spending, it would be like 1% of what it is now.

They should rename it to offense spending