US is funding torture by Uzbekistan dictator?

Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
2,427
Obama (or his puppet masters) need to act immediately to end US tax payers funding of torture if these charges are grounded in facts:


Finally Home Depot has a commitment to high ethical standards. According to Craig Whitlock of the Washington Post, NATO is planning to ship 60-70% of its surface cargo to Afghanistan by rail through Uzbekistan, a country where dictator, Islam Karimov and his feared NSS secret police, rule through terror. Lavish NATO payments to Uzbek officials have helped make Dictator Karimov’s daughter a billionaire. NATO officials have apparently convinced themselves that in order to keep the Afghan people free, the Uzbek people must remain enslaved.

This repugnant situation has somehow been rationalized away as an acceptable tradeoff.

http://www.kabulpress.org/my/spip.php?article72501
 
Probably. The Countries that aren't occupied are controlled through other means. That dictator will be killed once he is no longer is serving US interests.
 
Good point you make. Partnership of oppressive dictators in foreign countries with US/foreign masters is almost always a kiss of death for them in the end.
 
I think you mean Uz beki-beki-beki-beki-beki stan.
Other than that off-color joke I agree with you. Chalk up one more against NATO.
 
Good point you make. Partnership of oppressive dictators in foreign countries with US/foreign masters is almost always a kiss of death for them in the end.

Pretty much always.

The US foreign policy is truly schizophrenic though. The President of Afghanistan recently came out and said he would support Pakistan in a US-Pakistan war. Why isn't he being assassinated? Why are dictators that comply with US demands entirely assassinated and replaced with the very thing the US is supposed to be fighting? Bombing a Country and giving it foreign aid while the leaders that benefit are openly anti-US?

If the US installed dictators around the world and actually kept them alive with enough money and guns to suppress the people, it would have an unbreakable empire in the Middle East, with plenty of Countries to buy up the weapons (with foreign aid money) from the military industrial complex that the US currently buys to continue the wars that benefit the MIC. Win for the MIC, win for the neocons.

How these idiots in Washington are still taken seriously is way beyond me.
 
There is a lot of incentive to look the other way when it comes to the excesses of the Uzbek government. We need their bases as transit points to supply our forces in Afghanistan. Rebels/Taliban/Anti-government elements have cut a couple of the major transhipment points from Pakistan into Afghanistan - leaving us with limited overland supply options.
 
There is a lot of incentive to look the other way when it comes to the excesses of the Uzbek government. We need their bases as transit points to supply our forces in Afghanistan. Rebels/Taliban/Anti-government elements have cut a couple of the major transhipment points from Pakistan into Afghanistan - leaving us with limited overland supply options.
Pretty much .
 
How many other countries has the US set up torture chambers across the globe?

Syria
Egypt
Romania
Iraq
Afghanistan
Lithuaniania
Poland
Georgia
Saudi Arabia
Turkey



It grows.. it moves... it morphs... but US authorized torture continues
 
How many other countries has the US set up torture chambers across the globe?

Syria
Egypt
Romania
Iraq
Afghanistan
Lithuaniania
Poland
Georgia
Saudi Arabia
Turkey



It grows.. it moves... it morphs... but US authorized torture continues
Coming soon , all of Central Africa ??
 
I would add Jordan to the list also.




US double standard: Gaddafi bad, Karimov good
The US shows its hypocrisy by accusing "tyrants" of human rights abuses while not owning up to supporting dictators.



Ted Rall Last Modified: 29 Oct 2011 16:55

After four decades of brutal dictatorship and eight months of deadly conflict, the Libyan people can now celebrate their freedom and the beginning of a new era of promise," President Obama said last week. The capture and death of Muammar Gaddafi prompted him and other US officials to congratulate the Libyan people on their liberation from a despot accused of terrible violations of human rights, including the 1996 massacre of more than 1200 prison inmates.

The kudos was as much for the US itself as Libya's victorious Transitional National Council. After all, the United States played a decisive role in Gaddafi's death. First President Obama put together the NATO coalition that served as the Benghazi-based rebels' loaned air force. When the bombing campaign was announced in February, Gaddafi's suppression of the human rights of protesting rebels was front and centre: "The United States also strongly supports the universal rights of the Libyan people," Obama said at that time. "That includes the rights of peaceful assembly, free speech, and the ability of the Libyan people to determine their own destiny. These are human rights. They are not negotiable. They must be respected in every country. And they cannot be denied through violence or suppression." (No word on how police firing rubber bullets at unarmed, peaceful protesters at the Occupy movement in Oakland, California, fits into that.)

And in the end, it was reportedly a Hellfire missile fired by a Predator drone plane controlled by the CIA - in conjunction with an attack by a French fighter jet - that destroyed the convoy of cars Gaddafi and his entourage used to try to escape the siege of Sirte, driving him into the famous drainage pipe and into the hands of his tormentors and executioners.

US officials and media reports were right about Gaddafi's human rights record: It was atrocious. They cautioned the incoming TNC to make human rights a priority: "The Libyan authorities should also continue living up to their commitments to respect human rights, begin a national reconciliation process, secure weapons and dangerous materials, and bring together armed groups under a unified civilian leadership," Obama said. (No word on how Gaddafi's execution fits in to that.)

Hypocrisy reigns

Yet, in the very same week, the United States was cozying up to another long-time dictator - one whose style, brutal treatment of prisoners, and notorious massacre of political dissidents is highly reminiscent of the deposed Libyan tyrant.

Like a business that maintains two sets of records, one for the tax inspector and the other containing the truth, the United States has two different foreign policies. Its constitution, laws and treaty obligations prohibit torture, assassinations, and holding prisoners without trial. In reality there are secret prisons such as Guantánamo. Similarly, there are two sets of ethical standards in America's dealing with other countries. Enemies are held to the strictest standards. Allies get a pass. This double standard is the number-one cause of anti-Americanism in the world.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/10/2011102775111437925.html
 
Back
Top