US election results tabulated by foreign firm

Snowball

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
5,242
(USA) 1/12 - GLOBAL INTERNET VOTING FIRM BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM - By Bev Harris
Permission to reprint granted, with link to http://www.blackboxvoting.org

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won't work (if SCYTL's voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own "audit" by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.

SCYTL is moving into or already running elections in: the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia.

SCYTL is based in Barcelona; its funding comes from international venture capital funds including Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.

Here is the link to the press release regarding SYCTL's acquisition of SOE:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sc...leading-election-software-provider-2012-01-11
 
At first, as I read that, I thought it was suggesting that Sony Online Entertainment (SOE) had purchased a US electronic voting firm. I just about blew a gasket. Don't do that to me.

SOE Software, based in Tampa, has developed Clarity, a suite of 8 software modules that allow election authorities to be more efficient and transparent in their management of elections and in their communications with citizens and media. Over 900 jurisdictions in 26 states across the United States, including 14 state-wide customers, currently use SOE Software solutions in their electoral processes. More information is available at www.soesoftware.com .

I'm not saying that this isn't a bad thing, but the first thing that came to mind is Sony's recent debacles with their security.
 
Last edited:
What about the guy that owns/directs this company being one of the major contributors to Obamas campaign! Why is this being worked out without any noise from the election commission? Where are the complaints from Republicans that there will be no way to check the results for fraud? I am opposed to a foreign company counting my vote! Obama is talking as though the November election is already decided and with this, maybe it is! Out with it! Has the government of, by and for the people of the USA been overthrown?
 
On Spinnaker Capital;

"In December 2001, the EIF (European Investment Fund) decided to enter the company as an investor, contributing a third of the funds and thereby becoming the leading shareholder. Subsequently, other representative shareholders have entered the company, such as the Institut Català de Finances Holding and Telefónica. "
http://www.rivaygarcia.es/en/private_equity/companies/spinnaker_scr

So, appearently this EIF is the main shareholder in Spinnaker Capital... The EIF is an organization run by the EU.

The EIB is a public bank set up to promote EU policies. It was founded in 1958 under the Treaty of Rome at the same time as the European Economic Community (EEC). The EIB grants loans, which it finances through borrowing on the capital markets rather than by drawing on the EU budget. It often cofinances projects with the European Commission, which manages the EU's non-reimbursable aid, particularly the structural funds.

http://europa.eu/legislation_summar...nstitutions_bodies_and_agencies/o10007_en.htm

So in some weird way, the EU is shareholder in US election tabulations... Right ?
 
This is a scary development. As to why this happened, my guess would be: someone is saving or making money by doing this. It's ALWAYS about money. It's the same reason why more American flags are made in countries like China and Laos than in the US.

Hell, if the American Revolution were fought today, it would be outsourced to a foreign mercenary firm who would do it for half the price.
 
Back
Top