Updated Map: Delegate Winner by State
- Thread starter kylejack
- Start date
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
Well, we dispute Louisiana, and Nevada Paul clearly has the most, they are just bound on the first ballot vote, not for anything else.
RonPaulFanInGA
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 12,749
Looks like a real close race. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting to see who wins in Tampa. 
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
maybe i should hint at this, but back room discussions leads to the idea that bound- really isn't bound. so, next time you make a pretty map- make one with that in mind.
sailingaway
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2010
- Messages
- 72,103
Looks like a real close race. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting to see who wins in Tampa.
five states counts. six states counts.
Have you watched the Louisiana tape? Warning, skip the first 2:15 where people just have motions ignored, justifying ejecting the chair:
torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
CPUd
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 22,978
Not a map, but this one is not counting bound delegates, and optimistic - giving ME, MN, IA, NV, LA, VA, CO to Paul:
http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012
http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Republican_Party_presidential_primaries,_2012
Thank you! And I found this... http://www.thereal2012delegatecount.com/ Don't really understand it, but I like it!
Just Another Genius
Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 22
My gosh, and here I thought Ron Paul had over 200 bound delegates, plus hundreds of unbound delegates, when he really only has 200 plus bound and unbound delegates. It's obvious now why the GOP has been cheating at the state conventions lately, it wasn't because they were afraid of Ron Paul getting enough bound and unbound delegates, instead they were afraid Ron Paul would get five states and the Romney delegates who are Ron Paul supporters would have voted for Ron Paul and would have given him the nomination. This goes to show they already know all these delegates are UNBOUND, that is unless this lawsuit BOUNDS these delegates when they lose their case to this judge who owes his job to to the illegitimately elected Bill Clinton.
We are the majority, they aren't, that gives us the upper hand. We need a new game plan, they are trying to set the course, we need to start our own. And I know how to do just that. You need to start thinking like these evil doers, understand what it is they are trying to accomplish, and come at them from another direction which they don't control. I've got one hell of a post I'll be making either later tonight or tomorrow which will explain how to beat these corrupt evil doers and get Ron Paul elected President. I know their strengths, I know their weaknesses, I know how they think. I know how to beat them and win. And it won't cost anyone a dime. I only ask that you listen and consider the possibilities of what I say.
We are the majority, they aren't, that gives us the upper hand. We need a new game plan, they are trying to set the course, we need to start our own. And I know how to do just that. You need to start thinking like these evil doers, understand what it is they are trying to accomplish, and come at them from another direction which they don't control. I've got one hell of a post I'll be making either later tonight or tomorrow which will explain how to beat these corrupt evil doers and get Ron Paul elected President. I know their strengths, I know their weaknesses, I know how they think. I know how to beat them and win. And it won't cost anyone a dime. I only ask that you listen and consider the possibilities of what I say.
CPUd
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2012
- Messages
- 22,978
They are afraid of Ron Paul getting placed on the ballot not so much because they think he will win (at least not at this point), but because it will bring the perception of 'party unity' crashing down in front of an international audience. In this new paradigm where the conventions are grand parties, the actual business that gets done is mainly to change the initial voting results (where delegates have voted for someone other than their nominee) and toss them in favor of a unanimous vote, which ironically, they can do with a simple majority. When the opposition is just a handful of votes, they can do this with no mess. This time, there will be a number of delegates who will not let this go over very well.
Even if they have a majority, how is it going to look when they motion to make the vote unanimous and it is clear that it isn't?
Last edited:
