UPDATE - Sutton ZERO vote anomaly

This is fraud. It is a very big deal.

Either the G.O.P. represents power or it represents people. We're quite possibly on the cusp of finding out.

Thank God small towns still exist, and that they have access to the 'net so their people can be better informed than ever before!

Do we have a republic here or not?

I think King George II is evidence that we do not.
 
Re-Vote

I demand a Re-Vote.. everything on paper.. counted in front of 2 monitors for each candidate EVERYWHERE!!
 
By the way, I think it is time for best behavior because I, for one, have already posted the link to this thread elsewhere, and this is about to become a very public forum. There are already other threads discussing these events. Perhaps it's time to leave this one alone--consider it a shrine to the founding fathers!
 
We must demand a recount! this is FRAUD! if you let them get away with it they will thik they can get away with it more. HEADS MUST ROLL!!!

more publicity is good also!
 
It is imperative that we request a recount so that they know were watching. Even if he only gets the 31 votes from Sutton from it, it shows were watching. And a quick question, are the Diebold machines realistically recountable? They have been shady from the very beginning.
 
I think this good person of Sutton is proceeding properly. I don't think we need to deluge the state, the county or the town--yet. The last thing we should do is aggrivate this person's perfectly understandable desire not to be the eye of a firestorm.


I agree with you.

But, someone else suggested that only those in New Hampshire have a right to deal with this. I don't agree with that. We do have an interest in this, regardless of where it's located. This is for the president of a country, not the governor of NH.
 
We need to do this. Make this a sticky so we can all keep tabs on it.

Even if the votes don't matter enough to change RP's placement, they are still VOTES and they were still MISCOUNTED. This is a matter of principle.

We need to put everyone on notice that we will be watching all elections like hawks and any discrepancies we found WILL be exposed and dealt with. We want anyone who even thinks they can get away with vote fraud to be terrified of us.
 
I too just got off the phone with Sutton and personally confirmed this.
Really no need for everyone else to call there, since the result has already been reported to the Secretary of State and the results at the Politico feed now are showing Paul's 31 votes in Sutton.

http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/nhmap-popup.html

We need a SMALL group of NH volunteers to go county by county and confirm the vote totals. Politely.

And we do need a massive internet buzz over this to draw attention to the absolute need to NOT use electronic voting. Paper ballots counted by hand with independent observers documenting the count digitally.

Make sure to stress the Obama discrepancy as much as Paul's numbers. This will draw greater support for the cause.
 
Good, now make this a sticky, so this can be the official NH voting fraud thread instead of having 50 new threads today on this topic. And making it a sticky will make it easier to find and stay informed.

+1000
 
can you give the number of the sutton official to the campaign so they can confirm this to the grassroots here??????

I wouldn't give anyone my information on here. They are working on it, that's all that matters.
 
I too just got off the phone with Sutton and personally confirmed this.
Really no need for everyone else to call there, since the result has already been reported to the Secretary of State and the results at the Politico feed now are showing Paul's 31 votes in Sutton.

http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/nhmap-popup.html

We need a SMALL group of NH volunteers to go county by county and confirm the vote totals. Politely.

And we do need a massive internet buzz over this to draw attention to the absolute need to NOT use electronic voting. Paper ballots counted by hand with independent observers documenting the count digitally.

Make sure to stress the Obama discrepancy as much as Paul's numbers. This will draw greater support for the cause.


is that supposed to make it all better now to them....we gave rp his 31 votes....fu!@ that noise...it is not allright.....
 
This is the decision of this person. I would have my own concerns if it were me. If this turns out bigger than it already is, it could be a lot of trouble for this person, so they are trying to be careful. They are doing what they feel they CAN do right now. They are trying to talk to the campaign too. I think that is the best step for this person.

Thanks.

+1
 
I think this episode will play out with lawyers and computer forensics experts.

Oh, by the way--this right here is living proof that the new world order will REQUIRE the internet to die if they are to succeed. We bust them at every turn otherwise.
 
UPDATE to the UPDATE

I just spoke with this person and they have been thinking. There were 932 votes shown on Politico for Sutton last night. IF RP got 31 votes and it was a legitimate oversight, then the new vote total should be 963, but IF it is fraudulent, then those votes would have to have been absorbed in someone else's numbers. So let's think about this.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top