Update. I cannot vote for Trump.

[Swordsmyth]

Then Trump the CEO of Trump International is a globalist through and through.

RIGHT, the guy who has been calling for tariffs for decades, implemented them in office, and is running on even more.
Remember what I said about total dissociation from reality not being funny?

 

[acptulsa]

Remember what I said about total dissociation from reality not being funny?

Reality is, Trump's line of bespoke clothing is made in Red China.

You remember Red China. It's red, like Trump and nearly the whole modern GOP.

And you.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Reality is, Trump's line of bespoke clothing is made in Red China.

You remember Red China. It's red, like Trump and nearly the whole modern GOP.

And you.

Trump does business in the environment we have, that has nothing to do with what he supports.
He supports tariffs and reshoring industry, unlike free traders who support letting the CCP gain control of the world's industry through slave labor and government subsidies.

 

[acptulsa]

Trump does business in the environment we have, that has nothing to do with what he supports.

According to you, he also governs in the environment we have, and that also has nothing to do with what he supports. Doesn't do us any good, either.

 

[Swordsmyth]

According to you, he also governs in the environment we have, and that also has nothing to do with what he supports. Doesn't do us any good, either.

Nonsense, it limits what he can do, just as it would limit Ron or anyone else, but Trump gets much of what he supports done anyway, and he will get more this time.
It did us quite a bit of good last time, and will do far more this time.

 

[CCTelander]

Free trade is globalism, and so is open borders.

 

[acptulsa]

...this time.

...this time.

Will Rogers said inauguration day is when the promises stop and the alibis begin. But you're pushing a proven loser, so you have to do both at once.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Will Rogers said inauguration day is when the promises stop and the alibis begin. But you're pushing a proven loser, so you have to do both at once.

Deceptive editing and gaslighting as usual.

 

[acptulsa]

Deceptive editing and gaslighting as usual.

Nothing deceptive about the editing. You aren't pointing to his record. You can't. Your entire sales pitch is lies about last time and empty promises you can't keep that he'll do better.

Which makes you the gaslighter.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Nothing deceptive about the editing. You aren't pointing to his record. You can't. Your entire sales pitch is lies about last time and empty promises you can't keep that he'll do better.

Which makes you the gaslighter.

I have repeatedly pointed to his record all along, as he made it and afterwards, you pretending to forget about it doesn't work.

 

[acptulsa]

I have repeatedly pointed to his record all along, as he made it and afterwards, you pretending to forget about it doesn't work.

You point to things you make up.

We point to his record, and you either ignore us or make excuses.

 

[Working Poor]

I think I am going to have to vote for Trump.

 

[PAF]

I think I am going to have to vote for Trump.

I think I am going to have to vote for Kamala.

 

[Snowball]

IMHO, there has been a game afoot that no one in the US (media or politicians) has been willing to talk about.

Every time that Iran fires ballistic missiles at Israel, some portion gets through and accurately strikes their target. It could be 10%, it could be 100%. But the fact that some do hit their targets has been an example. This would lead directly to the next step, which would be a demonstration of a nuclear detonation. It appears that has happened.

Let me know when some neocon on the TV discuses this fact.

There isn't even any intelligent discussion allowed on "mainstream" television or radio.
The most real, unfitered news does not even appear in "mainstream" search engines.

Yes, they detonated. Yes, they are realists, even though they have religious objections to nuclear warfare.
Yes, they are capable of sending Israel back to the stone age, and Yes, they are allied with Russia and China, among lesser powers.

None of this had to happen. Trump and his appointed swamp creatures are regime-change advocates. They lied about the nature of and reasons for the JCPOA, constantly, on the "mainstream" meda outlets. They had most of their supporters, who don't want to learn about these matters, repeating their lies. There was no legal or sound strategic reason for Trump to remove the U.S. from the JCPOA. Since then, Iran has known it has no choice and must develop nuclear weapons of its own. And still, their leadership was open even until just last week (Pezeshkian's overtures) to a resurrection of diplomacy. But the current leadership of Israel does not want diplomacy. It wants escalation and the war to end all wars in the Middle East, which it expects to "win" with American muscle.

All of this is entirely by choice. It is not defensive. They want Trump to win, because they expect him to vigorously make war for Greater Israel.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

There isn't even any intelligent discussion allowed on "mainstream" television or radio.
The most real, unfitered news does not even appear in "mainstream" search engines.

Yes, they detonated. Yes, they are realists, even though they have religious objections to nuclear warfare.
Yes, they are capable of sending Israel back to the stone age, and Yes, they are allied with Russia and China, among lesser powers.

None of this had to happen. Trump and his appointed swamp creatures are regime-change advocates. They lied about the nature of and reasons for the JCPOA, constantly, on the "mainstream" meda outlets. They had most of their supporters, who don't want to learn about these matters, repeating their lies. There was no legal or sound strategic reason for Trump to remove the U.S. from the JCPOA. Since then, Iran has known it has no choice and must develop nuclear weapons of its own. And still, their leadership was open even until just last week (Pezeshkian's overtures) to a resurrection of diplomacy. But the current leadership of Israel does not want diplomacy. It wants escalation and the war to end all wars in the Middle East, which it expects to "win" with American muscle.

All of this is entirely by choice. It is not defensive. They want Trump to win, because they expect him to vigorously make war for Greater Israel.

 

[acptulsa]

All of this is entirely by choice. It is not defensive. They want Trump to win, because they expect him to vigorously make war for Greater Israel.

It's funny watching Trump fanbois trying to decide if they should spam more about what a man of peace they hope he is like SS, or start churning out excuses for Israel like dannno.

 

[Madison320]

That's a really nice thought. But, unless you have an awful lot of f&ck you money [to the tune of billions] immigrants TPTB will never allow that to happen. Not by a long shot in that cold day in hell.

Does Your Vote Count? "Why Even Ask The Question?"


It's odd that all of the things that can/should be affected locally [even that is a feat in itself], people always try to justify choosing between preselected kings and queens.

Ok, look at it this way. If harris wins and the inevitable inflationary collapse hits, it's more likely to get blamed on the establishment, the deep state, socialism, etc. I would think that's a good thing even without factoring in elections. There's a better chance for succession or some other movement towards decentralization if more people support it.

 

[Snowball]

It's funny watching Trump fanbois trying to decide if they should spam more about what a man of peace they hope he is like SS, or start churning out excuses for Israel like dannno.

I've never felt less hope about this country's future than I do now.

Trump is the worst Republican candidate ever.
The only reason he won in 2016 was because he was running against the worst Democrat candidate up to that time, Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, and the Pizzagate hoax.
If he wins next month, it will only be because he's running against the worst Democrat candidate ever, Kamala Harris, who is only there with no primary votes because Biden went senile, and because Biden limited his VP choices to deep state + black + females.

Meanwhile, none of these elected officials are really in control anyway, and they all talk to us like we're in primary school.

 

[WarriorLiberty]

I've never felt less hope about this country's future than I do now.

Trump is the worst Republican candidate ever.
The only reason he won in 2016 was because he was running against the worst Democrat candidate up to that time, Hillary Clinton, Benghazi, and the Pizzagate hoax.
If he wins next month, it will only be because he's running against the worst Democrat candidate ever, Kamala Harris, who is only there with no primary votes because Biden went senile, and because Biden limited his VP choices to deep state + black + females.

Meanwhile, none of these elected officials are really in control anyway, and they all talk to us like we're in primary school.

Its amazing how democrats came up with one of the worst choices for the democrats to go for.

I know some on here were saying Trump is doing everything to lose yet i can say that the same for Harris and her least interview.

You have people in NC and now FL likely will be impacted by two storms.
Harris is going around giving interviews and yet interviews are cringe..




Harris seems to be sabotaging her own campaign. As some on the internet point out.

Harris has been the VP for four years would difference would be if shes become president? none.


The only worry if Harris win she will crackdown on free speech and that we should not allow.

 

[Snowball]

Its amazing how democrats came up with one of the worst choices for the democrats to go for.

I know some on here were saying Trump is doing everything to lose yet i can say that the same for Harris and her least interview.

You have people in NC and now FL likely will be impacted by two storms.
Harris is going around giving interviews and yet interviews are cringe..




Harris seems to be sabotaging her own campaign. As some on the internet point out.

Harris has been the VP for four years would difference would be if shes become president? none.


The only worry if Harris win she will crackdown on free speech and that we should not allow.

I don't think either's "campaign" matters.

This is about the battle between their [very slightly] different elite sponsors, and the machinations of the actual state "elections".
Florida and North Carolina don't really matter to Harris. She's writing them both off.
Arizona and PA are the two biggest battlefronts, and the Dems are running both of them. If I had to bet, I'd bet Harris.
She can lose Virginia and NC and still win. Trump needs more to happen, because he needs Dem-run elections to go his way.