Up to 10 GOP senators consider bucking Trump on War Powers

Not wanting to engage in military operations against another country =/= defending everything their leaders do. Most people don't blindly defend one person above all reason and evidence. Most people, besides you, that is.

First these Trump supporters blame the Iranian general was somehow responsible for theses things.
-The deaths of 600 American soldiers although not really proven or shown provided evidence whatever Iran or the general that was killed was somehow behind it. For all we know it could have being the MEK behind it..

The MEK had in the past indeed killed American soldiers.
-Trump supporters and Sean Hannity are now blaming the Iranian general and Iran on whatever happened in Libya's benghazi with the death of the American amb although again no evidence is provided to this matter.
 
You defending a Manchild who killed a Iranian general based on the same Intel community that have known to lie in the past and now your accusing the guy by claiming that he killed American backed protesters at a university?

When your dear leader Trump is doing a regime change in Iran its ok! but it WAS wrong for Obama do it to Libya but ok for Trump to support a regime change which is favored by the NeoCons your side is defending?

Sounds like your dear leader is using the middle east and Iran as a deflection and distraction from problems at home...... Nothing else then that.

Uh, no you have it completely wrong.

Iran being against a dude in their regime who was torturing and killing thousands of their own peaceful protesters is a good thing. When that same guy has killed hundreds of Americans, and we happen to take him out, and the people rise up against their government that is a good thing too.

When we go in and topple a dictator who has done thing to us in order to replace them with a deep state stooge, that is wrong. I don't support that. I support Iran making their own choices.

Turns out they are happy with us taking out one of their deep state stooge Generals who was killing their own people.
 
Not wanting to engage in military operations against another country =/= defending everything their leaders do. Most people don't blindly defend one person above all reason and evidence. Most people, besides you, that is.

Ok, so you don't want to engage personally. That is understandable. I'm probably even be in the same boat with you on that one. Are upset that a guy who killed and tortured over 1,600 Iranian citizens peacefully protesting their government was killed? Because I'm not. At all.
 
First these Trump supporters blame the Iranian general was somehow responsible for theses things.
-The deaths of 600 American soldiers although not really proven or shown provided evidence whatever Iran or the general that was killed was somehow behind it. For all we know it could have being the MEK behind it..

The MEK had in the past indeed killed American soldiers.
-Trump supporters and Sean Hannity are now blaming the Iranian general and Iran on whatever happened in Libya's benghazi with the death of the American amb although again no evidence is provided to this matter.
Indeed. People in the Trump administration tried to connect Soleimani to Benghazi and even to 9/11. Their "imminent attack on embassies" justification for the strike fell apart within 2 weeks. That's how you know they are all liars who need to be ousted by any means.

Anyways, people like dannno are absolutely clueless about these issues, and will sling mud continuously regardless of whether it sticks or not. There is more than one fuckin general at a time in Iran. Soleimani was more in charge of foreign relations/coordination with other countries & armies/militias in the region. There are plenty of other generals and political officials that are in charge of the response to the protests in the streets.
 
Ok, so you don't want to engage personally. That is understandable. I'm probably even be in the same boat with you on that one. Are upset that a guy who killed and tortured over 1,600 Iranian citizens peacefully protesting their government was killed? Because I'm not. At all.
you type this dumb shit as if he personally shot all the guns himself and killed and tortured everybody in Iran who was killed and tortured. Do you know who qassem soleimani was? He was the commander of the QUDS FORCE. The QUDS FORCE is responsible for extraterritorial operations of the Iranian military. NOT domestic. Jesus. Other generals and political officials have far more to do with the response to the protests on the streets than qasem soleimani did.
 
Uh, no you have it completely wrong.

Iran being against a dude in their regime who was torturing and killing thousands of their own peaceful protesters is a good thing. When that same guy has killed hundreds of Americans, and we happen to take him out, and the people rise up against their government that is a good thing too.

When we go in and topple a dictator who has done thing to us in order to replace them with a deep state stooge, that is wrong. I don't support that. I support Iran making their own choices.

Turns out they are happy with us taking out one of their deep state stooge Generals who was killing their own people.

You are clueless, this Iranian general worked with the Russians in Syria agaisnt American/Saudi Proxy Jihadists and ISIS. And your saying Iran is happy about their general being dead who was a threat to the Saudis proxies and ISIS forces?? and peaceful protesters? in what is rioting any way peaceful?

Remember the regime change in Kiev? how were those any peaceful protestors? when in fact these protesters were clearly being ordered by someone above them to commit violent crimes?

I have being analyzing these protests for quite a while now if they are peaceful protests why arent there any protests calling for regime change in Qatar for how workers are being treated to build the 2020,2021 world cup stadiums? many of those workers are migrants and foreign.
 
Last edited:
And you can stop posting this "peaceful protest" dumb $#@!

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2019/11/19/iran-protest-takeyh-071432

As of 2 months ago they were burning down everything in sight. That doesn't mean they don't have a good reason to be angry. That doesn't mean Iran's government response is justified. But these protests are NOT "peaceful."

Indeed lets not forget how would President Trump to antifa protests in the same manner as Iran as? after all i have seen that Trump supporters do consider them rioters then protesters so i hope they understand the difference between protesters and rioters.

They arent the same, any nation has a right to self defense agaisnt rioters whatever its a Euporean Country or not. You are justified to use force to bring law and stability if these rioters refuse to stand down.

Rioters do not care about stability just chaos.
 
Indeed lets not forget how would President Trump to antifa protests in the same manner as Iran as? after all i have seen that Trump supporters do consider them rioters then protesters so i hope they understand the difference between protesters and rioters.

They arent the same, any nation has a right to self defense agaisnt rioters whatever its a Euporean Country or not. You are justified to use force to bring law and stability if these rioters refuse to stand down.

Rioters do not care about stability just chaos.
The "Law and Order" crowd have never been consistent. They apply the law and order only when it suits their current narrative.
 
And don't forget, dannno was the main defender of that nazi kid who plowed into those protesters cuz "he feared for his life and property." Certainly, by dannno's logic, if we consider all the damage to private and public property of Iran, maybe their government should start plowing down protesters in big armored vehicles. (I obviously wouldn't support this, just demonstrating dannno's retarded hypocrisy)
 
Back
Top