University Report: A Room Full of White People Is a Microaggression

White is a mixture of all colors in the spectrum essentially. Black reflects essentially no color light, white reflects essentially every color light.

Yes. White and black are called "values" in color theory and the visual arts. ("Colors" are called "hues")
 
Nothing wrong with a little sarcasm.

My stance is that Nature and Nurture are at work. I am not a universalist, one size does not fit all. The funny thing is I find it horribly racist to assume everyone will think/act just like you do. I do not oppose the idea of people from various backgrounds organizing amongst themselves. The Free State Project for example seems to have a diverse range of people and if they can make it work then good for them. But the idea that Sweden or Japan has to be forced by hostile elites to become mixed race or replaced is disturbing to me and genocidal. Somethings are not irreversible. The flipside of freedom of association is the freedom to disassociate. So I support those who wish to keep there genetics and culture intact as well as those who wish to freely associate with whom ever they choose. Get the big nasty tyrannical governments and social engineers out of the way and I think things would work themselves out.

They were recently pushing how diversity and multiculturism would be good for japan... lol. Using a japanese-black miss japan to push the agenda. Complaining how there weren't many black celebrities and TV personalities in Japan.

People inherently have more trust people of the same skin color and culture. It is why Chinese TV uses Chinese anchors/actors. Japanese TV uses Japanese anchors/actors. African TV uses African anchors/actors.

The world will be a dull and boring place if we all are inter-mixed and we lose all these nice, different cultures/traditions that we enjoy. I want to go to Germany to see German people and German architecture/stuff. =s...
 
Nothing wrong with a little sarcasm.

My stance is that Nature and Nurture are at work. I am not a universalist, one size does not fit all. The funny thing is I find it horribly racist to assume everyone will think/act just like you do. I do not oppose the idea of people from various backgrounds organizing amongst themselves. The Free State Project for example seems to have a diverse range of people and if they can make it work then good for them. But the idea that Sweden or Japan has to be forced by hostile elites to become mixed race or replaced is disturbing to me and genocidal. Somethings are not irreversible. The flipside of freedom of association is the freedom to disassociate. So I support those who wish to keep there genetics and culture intact as well as those who wish to freely associate with whom ever they choose. Get the big nasty tyrannical governments and social engineers out of the way and I think things would work themselves out.



swebikini.jpg

OH WOW, takes me back, love the pic and your statement, I'd up vote ya but....:rolleyes:



People inherently have more trust people of the same skin color and culture. It is why Chinese TV uses Chinese anchors/actors. Japanese TV uses Japanese anchors/actors. African TV uses African anchors/actors.

The world will be a dull and boring place if we all are inter-mixed and we lose all these nice, different cultures/traditions that we enjoy. I want to go to Germany to see German people and German architecture/stuff. =s...

Like your whole post but that last comment, nail on the head. To me "diversity" is one of the most foolish things I've ever heard and I can't believe how so many have bought into this nonsense, it is completely contradictory and self-destructive, like most leftists/marxist ideas.
 
It is crazy to me how so many RP supporters, libertarians, anarchists, etc see clearly the leftist-marxism on the economic front yet completely ignore it on the social front,

This is one of the main reasons liberty has lost to government power more often than not for decades, and its why Cultural Marxism exists in the first place. Change the culture, destroy all groups that have traditionally been dominate or simply the majority.
 
This is one of the main reasons liberty has lost to government power more often than not for decades, and its why Cultural Marxism exists in the first place. Change the culture, destroy all groups that have traditionally been dominate or simply the majority.

Exactly. Funny thing is, I'm not even Christian myself but I grew up in America in a small town that is mostly Christian, and every year at Christmas there were always all these things our town did - tree lighting, prayers, songs, etc, and all of it was organized, paid for by the local churches, and yes, GASP, SHOCK, we always had a manger scene at the town hall.....till about 8yrs ago when suddenly these fanatical atheists started popping up everywhere and one moved into our town, made a big fuss (along with many people who didn't even live there) and it's like what could we do? It's just stupid, I mean, I never saw it as them forcing me to believe what they did, it's Christmas for Pete's sakes, that manger scene had been up there every year since the towns founding, the ceremony was fun, everyone loved it, yet it all had to stop because apparently it was bothering this person.
 
In my deleted post I talked about my four threads I started. Yes two have racial implications, this one which I thought Libertarians would be interested in because of the psychological warfare and race baiting

Oh don't worry, we're quite aware of the "new" accounts that are suddenly appearing, creating race-bait threads or going straight to them right off the bat. After all, how else would bullshit rep be spread around? Just ask the guy who is nearly maxxed out after a few months.
 
Oh don't worry, we're quite aware of the "new" accounts that are suddenly appearing, creating race-bait threads or going straight to them right off the bat. After all, how else would bullshit rep be spread around? Just ask the guy who is nearly maxxed out after a few months.

You are the second jackass to accuse me of being a sock puppet lol. Are the moderators incapable of figuring out who is or isn't a sock or do the mods like sock accounts? I was on another Forum and someone posted Lets start a Libertarian Group thread in response to someone else's Lets start a Progressive (aka SJW) Group thread. I was for the most part able to have rational discussions with them (I did tease them on occasion) even if we disagreed on somethings. I have also been watching alot of Ron Paul video's lately (I missed the RP revolution of 2007/8 and was presented with Tea Parties instead around 2010) and other vids/websites like FSP, Free Talk Live and Attack the System. My main disagreement is that not all people are rootless and hyper-individualists like you.

I am sick of arguing with SJW retards and general trolls (on the other forum) and while I obviously see race as an issue things are more complicated then that, I kinda already explained this. I figured the Liberty loving types might have an interesting perspective and things to say and be capable of discussing things from different angles. And seriously how is pointing out the ridiculousness of the Racial Microaggressions Project and theory considered race-baiting? ButRacial Microaggressions Project/theory is not race baiting/waste of tax dollars/social engineering/White guilt tripping/....? That is so weird. Anyways go ahead and attack the messenger (and accuse him of being a sock) instead of the message or stick just your head in the sand like a good little ostrage.
 
Last edited:
It is rather amusing that people think I have multiple accounts. Think that if you want. I am everywhere, all the time and behind everything! The vast right wing pro-white conspiracy!

Seriously though, I have no other accounts on RPF. Get a mod to check my IP address and compare it against anyone else's. Also, I'll post a pic of my rep history. I do get rep from the more rightist contingent on here, but that's not where most of it comes from.

I told you guys that more people with reactionary leanings would be coming to this site. Believe it's all me if you like, but that'll become a pretty absurd thing to think a year from now.
 
Last edited:
It is rather amusing that people think I have multiple accounts. Think that if you want. I am everywhere, all the time and behind everything! The vast right wing pro-white conspiracy!

Seriously though, I have no other accounts on RPF. Get a mod to check my IP address and compare it against anyone else's. Also, I'll post a pic of my rep history. I do get rep from the more rightist contingent on here, but that's not where most of it comes from.

I told you guys that more people with reactionary leanings would be coming to this site. Believe it's all me if you like, but that'll become a pretty absurd thing to think a year from now.

Listening to Keith Preston from Attack The System (and even M.K Lords from ATS) (and like I said I was watching in amazement the old RP video's) who is able to see things from all angles made me think that this site would have alot of people who were capable of having those type of discussions. Being able to break things down from a Historical, Economic, Political, Social and yes even a Racial perspectives is quit appealing. I am not necessarily good at it but being able to pick things apart (small picture's) as well as being able to see the big picture is something I at least try to do. Are these people trolls? Or just "race doesn't exist and if you even say the word race then you are a racist" ? They don't seem to be SJW's but they do kinda use similar tactics.

EDIT: What is a Paleo Libertarian ?

Ever listen/read Dugin, Red Ice Radio, Horus, Counter Currents?
 
Last edited:
Listening to Keith Preston from Attack The System (and even M.K Lords from ATS) (and like I said I was watching in amazement the old RP video's) who is able to see things from all angles made me think that this site would have alot of people who were capable of having those type of discussions. Being able to break things down from a Historical, Economic, political, social and yes even racial perspectives is quit appealing. I am not necessarily good at it but being able to pick things apart (small picture's) as well as being able to see the big picture is something I at least try to do. Are these people trolls? Or just "race doesn't exist and if you even say the word race then you are a racist" ? They don't seem to be SJW's but they do kinda use similar tactics.
I like Preston and ATS. Other people to check out would be Richard Spencer, Jack Donovan, Ryan Faulk and Libertarian Realist on youtube. When it comes to blogs, I'd recommend Moldbug, Anarcho-Papist, Return of Kings, Reaxxion, More Right, Less Wrong and The Right Stuff (though the latter group does annoy me at times).

There are a lot of good people on this site who generally agree with our pro-white stance, but so too are there people who have swallowed the mainstream cultural Marxist narratives on race. It's infected everything, everywhere, including the liberty movement. Reaction exists for a reason, and it's growing fast. They aren't trolls, they're just lost. I was too at one time. Give it time, you'll see the libertarians who actually care about reality come to a position against equality, against feminism and in favor of race realism and complimentarist traditional gender norms. Those who just scream "waaaaaaaayyyycist!" at the top of their lungs are just beyond help. I see them as a clown act, a bumbling idiotic fool who stumbles about for my amusement.

The NRx is coming to RPF... and it will be glorious!
 
Listening to Keith Preston from Attack The System (and even M.K Lords from ATS) (and like I said I was watching in amazement the old RP video's) who is able to see things from all angles made me think that this site would have alot of people who were capable of having those type of discussions. Being able to break things down from a Historical, Economic, Political, Social and yes even a Racial perspectives is quit appealing. I am not necessarily good at it but being able to pick things apart (small picture's) as well as being able to see the big picture is something I at least try to do. Are these people trolls? Or just "race doesn't exist and if you even say the word race then you are a racist" ? They don't seem to be SJW's but they do kinda use similar tactics.

EDIT: What is a Paleo Libertarian ?

Ever listen/read Dugin, Red Ice Radio, Horus, Counter Currents?

I like Red Ice, don't know the others, RamzPaul is probably my favorite although anymore he seems to be getting too much into Jewspiracy territory, plus I'm just not all that big on this whole "IQ" studies stuff, I mean, not that I'm saying it's illogical that different races evolved in different ways, I guess I just don't care, I think as long as free association, the NAP and what not are respected, does it matter? If some races overall are better at this or that due to genetics that will all sort itself out once you no longer have laws trying to force association and guarantee certain outcomes.

I like Preston and ATS. Other people to check out would be Richard Spencer, Jack Donovan, Ryan Faulk and Libertarian Realist on youtube. When it comes to blogs, I'd recommend Moldbug, Anarcho-Papist, Return of Kings, Reaxxion, More Right, Less Wrong and The Right Stuff (though the latter group does annoy me at times).

Uh, gotta point out here, Jack Donovan is gay right?
 
Last edited:
Like your whole post but that last comment, nail on the head. To me "diversity" is one of the most foolish things I've ever heard and I can't believe how so many have bought into this nonsense, it is completely contradictory and self-destructive, like most leftists/marxist ideas.

Big difference between Japan, China, Germany, and the US... ...want to guess what it is?
 
You are the second jackass to accuse me of being a sock puppet lol. Are the moderators incapable of figuring out who is or isn't a sock or do the mods like sock accounts? I was on another Forum and someone posted Lets start a Libertarian Group thread in response to someone else's Lets start a Progressive (aka SJW) Group thread. I was for the most part able to have rational discussions with them (I did tease them on occasion) even if we disagreed on somethings. I have also been watching alot of Ron Paul video's lately (I missed the RP revolution of 2007/8 and was presented with Tea Parties instead around 2010) and other vids/websites like FSP, Free Talk Live and Attack the System. My main disagreement is that not all people are rootless and hyper-individualists like you.

I am sick of arguing with SJW retards and general trolls (on the other forum) and while I obviously see race as an issue things are more complicated then that, I kinda already explained this. I figured the Liberty loving types might have an interesting perspective and things to say and be capable of discussing things from different angles. And seriously how is pointing out the ridiculousness of the Racial Microaggressions Project and theory considered race-baiting? ButRacial Microaggressions Project/theory is not race baiting/waste of tax dollars/social engineering/White guilt tripping/....? That is so weird. Anyways go ahead and attack the messenger (and accuse him of being a sock) instead of the message or stick just your head in the sand like a good little ostrage.

People who use the term "SJW" all pretty much come from stormfront. You are the same dorks using terms like "beta-cuck" and all that other silly little angry nazi wannabe terminology. You are the same dorks that are constantly getting banned only to re-appear with a new account a few weeks later.

And EVEN if you were a new person every time, you all say the same shit, speak about the same damn few authors, and use the same micro-jingos and sayings.... ...your root is clear.

I see your posts all over news stories comment sections too. You always say the same stupid garbage.... ...because your ideology can't work if you think for yourself.


....and at it's core, it is racism, pure and simple. Stupid.... Fucking... racism.


"SJW" "Alinksy" "anti-racist is anti-white" "betacuck" <<--- lol!

recently, some little nazi completely dribbled all over himself here while talking about race being the reason African civilizations were never great.

You guys are stupid.
 
Last edited:
People who use the term "SJW" all pretty much come from stormfront. You are the same dorks using terms like "beta-cuck" and all that other silly little angry nazi wannabe terminology. You are the same dorks that are constantly getting banned only to re-appear with a new account a few weeks later.

And EVEN if you were a new person every time, you all say the same shit, speak about the same damn few authors, and use the same micro-jingos and sayings.... ...your root is clear.

I see your posts all over news stories comment sections too. You always say the same stupid garbage.... ...because your ideology can't work if you think for yourself.


....and at it's core, it is racism, pure and simple. Stupid.... Fucking... racism.


"SJW" "Alinksy" "anti-racist is anti-white" "betacuck" <<--- lol!

recently, some little nazi completely dribbled all over himself here while talking about race being the reason African civilizations were never great.

You guys are stupid.

You sound like a typical White-Anti-White. :D
 
Listening to Keith Preston from Attack The System (and even M.K Lords from ATS) (and like I said I was watching in amazement the old RP video's) who is able to see things from all angles made me think that this site would have alot of people who were capable of having those type of discussions. Being able to break things down from a Historical, Economic, Political, Social and yes even a Racial perspectives is quit appealing. I am not necessarily good at it but being able to pick things apart (small picture's) as well as being able to see the big picture is something I at least try to do. Are these people trolls? Or just "race doesn't exist and if you even say the word race then you are a racist" ? They don't seem to be SJW's but they do kinda use similar tactics.

They're not trolls.

Long before neoreaction arrived on the scene, there was this left-right split among libertarians: been around forever. Rothbard was dealing with it back when he and half a dozen other guys were practically the only libertarians in the country. It's still here. The left-libertarians (I'm prepared: let the neg-reps rain down upon me) tend to be the more shallow-thinking ones. They deal with Austrian economics and ethics, which are typically reduced to NAP, and that's pretty much it. Not bad of, of course, but not enough. There's a lack of interest in a number of important areas, primarily because (in my speculation) investigating those areas would yield uncomfortable conclusions about the viability of Rothbardian anarcho-capitalism, which they would rather not have to confront (there's a notable correlation between left:right::anarchist:minarchist). There are certain unstated assumptions (even unthought assumptions) which are required for that system to work, concerning how people behave, differences among people (or the lack thereof), etc. Basically, optimistic Enlightenment assumptions, as opposed to reality.

But as Paleo said, more libertarians will be making a rightward turn in coming years, as the gaping holes in the alternative become increasingly difficult to ignore.

Anyway, welcome to the forums.

CORRECTION:

People who use the term "SJW" all pretty much come from stormfront.

The vast majority are not trolls...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The term "SJW" is used by all critics of feminism. Anyone who thinks it comes from SF should be dismissed out of hand, because they have no desire to actually understand anything that's going on.
 
They're not trolls.

Long before neoreaction arrived on the scene, there was this left-right split among libertarians: been around forever. Rothbard was dealing with it back when he and half a dozen other guys were practically the only libertarians in the country. It's still here. The left-libertarians (I'm prepared: let the neg-reps rain down upon me) tend to be the more shallow-thinking ones. They deal with Austrian economics and ethics, which are typically reduced to NAP, and that's pretty much it. Not bad of, of course, but not enough. There's a lack of interest in a number of important areas, primarily because (in my speculation) investigating those areas would yield uncomfortable conclusions about the viability of Rothbardian anarcho-capitalism, which they would rather not have to confront (there's a notable correlation between left:right::anarchist:minarchist). There are certain unstated assumptions (even unthought assumptions) which are required for that system to work, concerning how people behave, differences among people (or the lack thereof), etc. Basically, optimistic Enlightenment assumptions, as opposed to reality.

But as Paleo said, more libertarians will be making a rightward turn in coming years, as the gaping holes in the alternative become increasingly difficult to ignore.

Anyway, welcome to the forums.

Thanx for the explanation, I will ignore them from now on and not explain/defend myself, although I might have to troll them if I'm in the mood but like I said in another post I popped over here to get away from drama and drama queens.

The term "SJW" is used by all critics of feminism. Anyone who thinks it comes from SF should be dismissed out of hand, because they have no desire to actually understand anything that's going on.

This is not your momma's feminism, 3rd wave feminism is totalitarian nastiness and you think they would see that but nope.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top