University Bureaucracy Squelching Austrian Economics!

Oh how cute, you edited your post. Keep talking out of your ass and hope no one notices Kade...

:rolleyes:
 
let's start with you... what do you offer that's unique other than your obsession to be so?

That's an interesting way to frame that question. Have you ever tried approaching me without insulting? You might be surprised.

I am constantly under scrutiny, and I don't exactly offer myself up as a mentor for anyone...

But as it stands, I can offer an pretty solid analysis of human behavior in regards to political situations. I can help you become a better social engineer, I can analyze people's emotional responses in situations, I can demonstrate fluid analysis of history. I can offer a substantial amount of real world technology advice and troubleshooting...

In terms of uniqueness, I suppose my variety of merit-based technocracy is rather unique.

As it stands as well, even though my liberalism is not unique, it appears it stands as such on these forums..

Anything else?
 
I don't understand.

What are you talking about, you don't understand. I'm asking for your explanation of why spending falls in all sectors during a recession. What's not to understand?
 
I like how Kade gave 2 examples, that were refuted and doesn't show what his economic school has to offer; then he quickly switches topics, because he knows he doesn't know what he is talking about. Don't criticize things you have little understanding off and call them academic fallacies.
 
I am now convinced that kade is a sociopath. And a troll.

Ironically, he is one of the more valuable contributors on this forum.

As much as it sucks to admit it, the majority of posters here couldn't debate their way out of a wet paper bag and he enjoys beating up on those kind.

I would say this is the one thing that is holding us back.....Too many libertarian purists unaware that there truly are holes in the plan.
 
Ironically, he is one of the more valuable contributors on this forum.

As much as it sucks to admit it, the majority of posters here couldn't debate their way out of a wet paper bag and he enjoys beating up on those kind.

I would say this is the one thing that is holding us back.....Too many libertarian purists unaware that there truly are holes in the plan.

Well, I disagree. He hasn't made one substantive post in this thread for sure.

As far as "holes in the plan" I have no idea what you mean by that.
 
Well, I disagree. He hasn't made one substantive post in this thread for sure.

As far as "holes in the plan" I have no idea what you mean by that.

This is not a libertarian movement, yet the majority on this forum act like it is.

The plan I am speaking of is going above and beyond the restoration of the constitution and the rule of law.
 
That's an interesting way to frame that question. Have you ever tried approaching me without insulting? You might be surprised.

I am constantly under scrutiny, and I don't exactly offer myself up as a mentor for anyone...

You bring all this upon yourself. I bet you like it, too, beneath the emo-boy facade...

You falsely accuse me as an idiot jesus-freak in another thread and now play the victim? ha.



Anyway, I actually did like you at one point.

I will be more respectful to you in the future.
 
This is not a libertarian movement, yet the majority on this forum act like it is.

The plan I am speaking of is going above and beyond the restoration of the constitution and the rule of law.

Libertarianism is the heart and soul of traditonal conservatism. Supposing we can ever get our government down to the minarchist ideal then we can discuss and debate the next step. Thats a big "if." Probably one I won't see in my lifetime, but who knows? Our short term goals are the same and thats all that matters for now. If you think its better we have public schools with compulsory attendance, public roads, etc, thats ok. I don't really care. Thats not whats important now.
 
Libertarianism is the heart and soul of traditonal conservatism. Supposing we can ever get our federal government down to the minarchist ideal then we can discuss and debate the next step. Thats a big "if." Probably one I won't see in my lifetime, but who knows? Our short term goals are the same and thats all that matters for now. If you think its better we have public schools with compulsory attendance, public roads, etc, thats ok. I don't really care. Thats not whats important now.

outside of the one minor correction, I'm in total agreement.
 
This is not a libertarian movement, yet the majority on this forum act like it is.

The plan I am speaking of is going above and beyond the restoration of the constitution and the rule of law.

Let me put it to you, how Friedman put it to me: A conservative is someone who wants to save, to conserve something; do you want to conserve the way our government acts right now? Mind I say, Milton said this when government was probably 4 times smaller then now lol. He then goes on to say he is a liberal, but means classical liberal, which today is known as libertarian.
 
What are you talking about, you don't understand. I'm asking for your explanation of why spending falls in all sectors during a recession. What's not to understand?

Kade, i am however, still waiting.....
 
Let me put it to you, how Friedman put it to me: A conservative is someone who wants to save, to conserve something; do you want to conserve the way our government acts right now? Mind I say, Milton said this when government was probably 4 times smaller then now lol. He then goes on to say he is a liberal, but means classical liberal, which today is known as libertarian.

I want to save the original understanding of the constitution.
 
Back
Top