United Nations Says New Currency Is Needed to Fix Broken 'Confidence Game'

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
UN Says New Currency Is Needed to Fix Broken ‘Confidence Game’


Bloomberg.com
Sept. 7, 2009


The dollar’s role in international trade should be reduced by establishing a new currency to protect emerging markets from the “confidence game” of financial speculation, the United Nations said.

UN countries should agree on the creation of a global reserve bank to issue the currency and to monitor the national exchange rates of its members, the Geneva-based UN Conference on Trade and Development said today in a report.

China, India, Brazil and Russia this year called for a replacement to the dollar as the main reserve currency after the financial crisis sparked by the collapse of the U.S. mortgage market led to the worst global recession since World War II. China, the world’s largest holder of dollar reserves, said a supranational currency such as the International Monetary Fund’s special drawing rights, or SDRs, may add stability.
...

Full Story:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aSp9VoPeHquI


====


Confirmed: International Monetary Fund (IMF) set to be the World's Federal Reserve!
The G20 Push to "Supersize" the IMF



William F. Jasper | The New American
06 March 2009

Read it:
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=182725
 
Last edited:
Ah, yes, replace the one pea and three shells game with a two peas and twelve shells game.
They really believe we are that stupid, don't they?
 
They really believe we are that stupid, don't they?

Most Americans are that stupid, Yes. :D



Are Public Schools Harming Your Kids? - Samuel L. Blumenfeld
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=174151

Government Education: Enemy of a Free Society
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=206933

Americans Score an “F” in American History
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=206846

SAT Scores Decline in NYC Schools
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=207416


John Stossel: Stupid in America, How We Cheat Our Kids - Public School System

YouTube - Stupid in America
 
Last edited:
UN countries should agree on the creation of a global reserve bank to issue the currency and to monitor the national exchange rates of its members, the Geneva-based UN Conference on Trade and Development said today in a report.

Looks to me like they want to start their own Ponzi scheme using their own 'reserve bank' and their own fiat currency so they can be the ones to harvest the money from the illegal and nefarious inflation tax. This one would encompass the entire world rather than just the United States.
 
Looks to me like they want to start their own Ponzi scheme using their own 'reserve bank' and their own fiat currency so they can be the ones to harvest the money from the illegal and nefarious inflation tax. This one would encompass the entire world rather than just the United States.

I fear that abolishing the Federal Reserve will open the door to a "Global Federal Reserve" run by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)/United Nations.

It will just be a mass transfer of power. I made this comment back in March 2009. Watch it unfold.
 
Looks to me like they want to start their own Ponzi scheme using their own 'reserve bank' and their own fiat currency so they can be the ones to harvest the money from the illegal and nefarious inflation tax. This one would encompass the entire world rather than just the United States.

Everything going according to plan. The Federal Reserve is just a member bank of the world bankers. Same as the Bank of England, Bank of Europe, etc. There's no "starting their own Ponzi scheme". It's been *their* scheme all along. They own ALL OF IT. They're just moving it up a notch to help bring in NWO style one-world rule that they've been working toward for a long time.

Im still all for smashing the Fed though. The key will be whether we allow the banking cartel to force us to submit to international banking rule instead of a truly independent national rule of sound money and policy. If so, they'll just keep moving the goalposts and changing the design on the paper so the scam can start all over again. That's the "beauty" of fiat money. Change the design, change the numbers and "declare" a fresh start, eventhough it's still just worthless paper.

If there is to be a true revolution and a return of this country to the founding principles then it MUST happen when the dollar collapses and the bankers start to implement the monetary changes. As long as they control the very method of exchange of goods and services they will control everyone's lives. Taking that control back is the only way.
 
The tinfoil hatters say they are afraid of a global currency because of so-called "NWO" conspiracies.

What is ironic is that the rest of the world *wants* a global currency because they are finding it hard to trust the USD anymore.

The tinfoil hatters - as long as they are Americans - *are* right to fear a global currency, not because of the "NWO taking over", but because the adoption of such a global currency would mean a flood of USD dollars going back to the US. This is going to require jacking up interest rates sky-high or will otherwise trigger massive inflation.
 
BROKEN CONFIDENCE GAME?

The only game token is the fiat itself, and the only rule of the game is to have confidence in it.

So that means GAME OVER, correct?
 
The tinfoil hatters say they are afraid of a global currency because of so-called "NWO" conspiracies.

What is ironic is that the rest of the world *wants* a global currency because they are finding it hard to trust the USD anymore.

The tinfoil hatters - as long as they are Americans - *are* right to fear a global currency, not because of the "NWO taking over", but because the adoption of such a global currency would mean a flood of USD dollars going back to the US. This is going to require jacking up interest rates sky-high or will otherwise trigger massive inflation.

The core issue here is moral hazard. A de facto world currency determined by markets would probably be a very good thing...but a de jure world currency manipulated by central bureaucrats with their own motivations, well...not so much, to put it lightly. Regardless of nationalism and our current situation with the dollar, a bunch of international bureaucrats manipulating my money would still be worst than a bunch of national bureaucrats manipulating my money, because they'd be even farther away and even more unaccountable. Of course, I'm sure that no globalist elites would ever strive to create such positions of power for their own benefit, would they? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The Creature From Jekyll Island, if I recall correctly, claims that the IMF will be the new FED.

Looks like things are going according to plan, as the IMF and the UN are about one and the same.
 
As mentioned in my earlier post on this thread Americans have every reason to fear a global currency. Once the USD gets replaced as reserve currency, its going to drag down the living standard of Americans tremendously.

For other countries who use other currencies however, these calls for a "new world order currency" - as the tinfoil hatters like to see it as - are just a sign that they no longer trust the Fed to safeguard the value of the currency it issues or that American productivity can back it up.

They see it less a matter of world bureaucrats taking over than of waning US power. The truth is that, in a lot of ways, the US is currently the world's government and the Fed effectively issues the world's currency. Before this last great economic crisis, there was much faith in the US and its currency and that American policymakers would live up to their pre-eminent role as sole superpower.

The tinfoil hatters think that the USD will go away and be replaced by a world currency, but what they should really worry about is the US dollar being devalued significantly over time. It will continue to be issued, but may lose its role as reserve currency. For Americans, it will indeed be equivalent to a big loss of control over the financial world (and many would say deservedly so). For the rest of the world however, it is just a transition from letting Americans handle the job to letting a different bunch of people do it, and presumably not in the national interests of just one country. For them, it might be more of a good thing than bad.

Historically, there were times when the British wanted the pound to be artificially strong in spite of macroeconomic forces that worked against that fact. (A strong pound was a symbol of a strong Britain.) As people like Soros seem to have proven however, macroeconomic forces always eventually win. The US Fed, interestingly enough, does not seem to be engaging in such actions of pride and that is where I see the difference. (As Jim Rogers has said, history rhymes. Not necessarily repeats.)

The US can try to save its pride and try to bolster the value of the USD, but if it wants to, it must take its lumps in the form of a huge and politically infeasible contraction in its economy. It would be interesting to see if the very people calling for "sound money" here on RPF will be able to maintain that same viewpoint in the face of even more massive job losses than there already are. I'm not saying that's impossible, I'm just interested to see how people's tune may change.

So-called "isolationists" like Ron Paul may actually be offering the right prescription. Consolidate, withdraw the USD as world reserve currency, and withdraw the troops from all corners of the American empire. That may be just what America needs for self-renewal. But the costs of doing this will be a tremendous drop in American living standards, because for the last two to three generations, Americans' inflated living standards were made possible precisely because they were at the seat of empire. You don't lose that status without having to pay a heavy price for it.
 
Last edited:
As mentioned in my earlier post on this thread Americans have every reason to fear a global currency. Once the USD gets replaced as reserve currency, its going to drag down the living standard of Americans tremendously.

For other countries who use other currencies however, these calls for a "new world order currency" - as the tinfoil hatters like to see it as - are just a sign that they no longer trust the Fed to safeguard the value of the currency it issues.

They see it less a matter of world bureaucrats taking over than of waning US power. The truth is that, in a lot of ways, the US is currently the world's government and the Fed effectively issues the world's currency. Before this last great economic crisis, there was much faith in the US and its currency and that American policymakers would live up to their pre-eminent role as sole superpower.

The tinfoil hatters think that the USD will go away and be replaced by a world currency, but what they should really worry about is the US dollar being devalued significantly over time. It will continue to be issued, but may lose its role as reserve currency. For Americans, it will indeed be equivalent to a big loss of control over the financial world (and many would say deservedly so). For the rest of the world however, it is just a transition from letting Americans handle the job to letting a different bunch of people do it, and presumably not in the national interests of just one country. For them, it might be more of a good thing than bad.

Historically, there were times when the British wanted the pound to be artificially strong in spite of macroeconomic forces that worked against that fact. (A strong pound was a symbol of a strong Britain.) As people like Soros seem to have proven however, macroeconomic forces always eventually win. The US Fed, interestingly enough, does not seem to be engaging in such actions of pride and that is where I see the difference. (As Jim Rogers has said, history rhymes. Not necessarily repeats.)

The US can try to save its pride and try to bolster the value of the USD, but if it wants to, it must take its lumps in the form of a huge and politically infeasible contraction in its economy. It would be interesting to see if the very people calling for "sound money" here on RPF will be able to maintain that same viewpoint in the face of even more massive job losses than there already are. I'm not saying that's impossible, I'm just interested to see how people's tune may change.

So-called "isolationists" like Ron Paul may actually be offering the right prescription. Consolidate, withdraw the USD as world reserve currency, and withdraw the troops from all corners of the American empire. That may be just what America needs for self-renewal. But the costs of doing this will be a tremendous drop in American living standards, because for the last two to three generations, Americans' inflated living standards were made possible precisely because they were at the seat of empire. You don't lose that status without having to pay a heavy price for it.

I partially agree, but we couldn't keep "empire status" forever anyway even if it was morally defensible...and US dollars flooding back into the US market is something I think I'd call "blowback." In the long run, empire isn't good for anyone except a select few. Besides, it's obvious even now [before the inevitable fall] that certain interests in the financial world and military-industrial complex have benefitted FAR MORE from empire than the average American. Combined with continual inflation, if you consider the taxes we've paid to maintain military hegemony (for the primary benefit of privileged interests, not our own), the average American's living standard may very well be worse off today because of our empire status anyway.
 
Last edited:
The United Nations blasted capitalism and the position of the dollar as the international reserve currency, proposing more government interference and an international monetary regime instead.


United Nations Attacks Capitalism, Dollar


Alex Newman | The New American
08 September 2009


The United Nations released a report Monday attacking free-market economics and the role of United States federal reserve notes in the world economy while proposing increased centralization of global monetary and financial systems and more “solutions” to so-called “climate change.”

The financial crisis “supports the case for a more fundamental rethinking of global financial governance,” claims the report from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). “In the discussion about necessary reforms of the international monetary and financial system, the problem of the United States dollar serving as the main international reserve asset has received renewed attention.”

The solution, according to the report, is the creation of a global reserve bank and allowing countries to deposit their federal reserve notes with the International Monetary Fund in exchange for a type of supra-national fiat currency known as ‘Special Drawing Rights’ (SDRs). The SDRs could then be used to settle international payments.

"Replacing the dollar with an artificial currency would solve some of the problems related to the potential of countries running large deficits and would help stability," explained one of the authors of the report, Detlef Kotte.

Hiding behind the passive voice, the report proceeds to promote a sort of global Marxism and further wealth redistribution - for the good of the “global economy,” of course. Instead of SDR distribution being based on member states’ quotas, “it has been suggested that in order for the SDR to become the main form of international liquidity and means of reserve holding, new SDR allocations should be made according to the needs of countries.” It then promotes world-wide central planning to “stabilize global output growth” by issuing more SDRs or retiring them as the emerging global government deems necessary.

The UN body then goes on to suggest a system of controls for national currency exchange rates, emphasizing that debtor nations like the U.S. and countries with large surpluses like China and Germany create imbalances in global trade that should be corrected.

"A viable solution to the exchange-rate problem would be a system of managed flexible exchange rates targeting a rate that is consistent with a sustainable current-account position, which is preferable to any 'corner solution,'" the report said. “But since the exchange rate is a variable that involves more than one currency, there is a much better chance of achieving a stable pattern of exchange rates in a multilaterally agreed framework for exchange-rate management."

Another suggestion offered in the report is the proposed creation “regional payments clearance mechanisms that function without using the dollar,” supposedly to help avert financial and currency crises or “manage them better if they occurred.”

This is not the first time the global body has called for scrapping federal reserve notes as the world’s international reserve currency. Another UN panel concluded earlier this year that talks for creating a new global system based on a “basket” of currencies should be undertaken. Over the last few months, Russia, China and Brazil have also been clamoring for a new global monetary system.

The report opened with a quote from John Keynes and featured frequent attacks on market mechanisms - without noting that central bank manipulations and artificially set interest rates can hardly be considered laissez-faire. “The experience with this crisis proves that free financial markets do not lead to optimal social and macroeconomic outcomes, and suggests that the relationship between the State and market forces needs to be fundamentally reviewed,” a summary of report on the UNCTAD website claimed.

"The most important lesson of the global crisis is that financial markets don't get prices right," explained Heiner Flassbeck, a director of the UN body and a co-author of the report. Apparently a global government would. “An initiative equivalent to Bretton Woods or the European Monetary System is needed,” Flassbeck told Bloomberg news.

More UN disdain of free markets was highlighted later, in the document’s section on climate change. “Emissions regulation and control have to be made more stringent” to be compatible with growth, the report argued.

Dissemination and development of “climate-friendly” technology “cannot be left to market forces alone; they also require strong and internationally coordinated government action.” According to the report, the alleged “urgent need” to reduce emissions calls for “direct government intervention” and “strict regulations.”

The UN admitted that this global system could not be created quickly. There needs to be time for “international consensus” and “multilateral institution building.” But would these so-called “solutions” really accomplish anything besides another giant step toward world government? Probably not.

The world is right to be angry with the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, which led to the current crisis more than any other factor. Americans should be mad too. But the solution is obviously not to blame the “free market” or impose such a monstrous banking system upon the entire world economy at the global level. The U.S. should abolish the Federal Reserve and halt all funding to the anti-American UN pending a complete withdrawal.


SOURCE:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index...mainmenu-44/1841-un-attacks-capitalism-dollar
 
Back
Top