This is true. A free market, if one existed, would not be a slave ship. This current market however is slavery. Business owners are forced by threat of the government gun to allow a union on their property. They are forced by that same violent entity to accept terms of unions that they do not voluntarily agree to. The slave today is the person that creates commerce. His masters are those take over his business and destroy it from the inside.The free market is not a slave ship. You don't get to employ people for less than they're willing to work for.
Anything other than maximum profit is malinvestment of capital.
Speaking of vulture capitalists: Twinkies, Ho Hos going for $100 and more on eBay
They made Nature's Pride? Argh. I wouldn't buy Twinkies or Wonder Bread to save my soul, but Nature's Pride is the brand I buy. Oh, now I'm bummed.
Beefsteak rye too..
That's the fault of legislators, not unions or labor.A free market would not have coercive unions. This is not a free market.
Yet the unions continue to lobby the legislators for more power and use it to aggress against businesses. Unions are just another violent arm of the state. They claim wealth and property that they did not earn and use the threat of government violence to collect it.That's the fault of legislators, not unions or labor.
Thanks for sharing. I had a talk with someone at work. Union bad is already at play. I guess cause the script of blaming bad ole republicans doesn't work with those union protecting dems in power. Serfs, time for some serfs.lets be real. The strategy is/was to break the Union. Trust me, the dogs in mgmt. in a few years will resurrect Wonder/Hostess as non-union, which will guarantee the upper class and stock holders their pound of flesh in the guise of FRN's...and instead of good paying living wages, and benefits there will be zero medical and pension plans that pay perhaps 10 bucks hr. I wouldn't work in a bakery for that. I also operated ovens, and in the summer months i recorded 110 degrees in the area. Exhaust fans were always on high mode to keep it at that temp. Go ahead, TRY and work in a bakery like that for those wages. I'd love to see one of you try. I've seen many people walk off the job because of the conditions and very hard work required. Its not for everybody.
Gee, who else does that? Ah yes, capital, but you're only condemning labor for it, not capital.Yet the unions continue to lobby the legislators for more power and use it to aggress against businesses. Unions are just another violent arm of the state. They claim wealth and property that they did not earn and use the threat of government violence to collect it.
Because you and your union brothers are nothing. This is how they think. They are special and unique. You are a resource, like a stapler, or an oven.why should they quit?...why can't employers treat their workers well?...seems like a good biz practice to me. Keep em happy. They work for you, and are glad to because you treat them well...union or otherwise...
I do that because the percentage of unions that rely on govt backing is larger than businesses that seek govt backing.Gee, who else does that? Ah yes, capital, but you're only condemning labor for it, not capital.
why should they quit?...why can't employers treat their workers well?...seems like a good biz practice to me. Keep em happy. They work for you, and are glad to because you treat them well...union or otherwise...
But surely you'd change your tune if we were talking about a specific company that was relying on the government to service the pension program they agreed to pay their employees, right? Such as Hostess. http://www.pionline.com/article/201...terminate-pension-plan-as-part-of-liquidationI do that because the percentage of unions that rely on govt backing is larger than businesses that seek govt backing.
Nothing makes me happier than seeing a union strike that ultimately ends with those strikers losing their jobs. Justice, sweet justice. The victim has been drained and no longer has any milk money for the bully to steal.
That's the fault of legislators, not unions or labor.
I kind of figured it was more about the company trying to eliminate both their union problem and their legacy costs. Now they can re-brand under a different name and start all over again without those problems.But surely you'd change your tune if we were talking about a specific company that was relying on the government to service the pension program they agreed to pay their employees, right? Such as Hostess. http://www.pionline.com/article/201...terminate-pension-plan-as-part-of-liquidation