Colour...how long have you been in the Nebraska? Are you saying AF doesn't have any color? Or maybe he is discolored?
But isn't "colour" the European spelling?
I kid you not. A subway near me has a men's restroom and an "other" restroom. There is no women's restroom there. You've come a long way baby?
But hell, the feminist did it to themselves.
![]()
^That came from a lesbian feminist blog. So....why are we being told that LGBTQHB is one big happy party?
See, you guys? He thinks about me all the time!^^ And in totally weird, inappropriate, and pervy ways!Corrected
See, you guys? He thinks about me all the time!^^ And in totally weird, inappropriate, and pervy ways!He loves me!
~hugs [MENTION=6186]Danke[/MENTION]~
Ol' [MENTION=6186]Danke[/MENTION] is a pro with all things ghey, so he can be pretty deceptive. I had to learn to watch out for him cuz he stalks me so much.I had to read it closely, three times, before I saw what he did there.
I like this idea.
I think "people of color" should have their own facilities as well, to protect them against white micro-aggressions.
[/QUOTE![]()
LOL Divide us up by sex to instill mistrust and breed paranoia between the sexes.
You honestly think I stalk you? LOL!!! ego much?Hugz boy accusing other of stalking, rich.
Was subjected to in flight "entertainment" yesterday that amounted to some B list Jerry Springer type giving lie detector tests to willing ratings victims.
Couple "2" was a typical pair of lesbians, one dumpy house-frau looking woman paired with the "man" lesbian, complete with buzzcut and tattoos.
They beat the crap out each other worse than all the others, with the studio mob cheering them on.
From wiki:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey reports on the lifetime prevalence of rape, physical violence or stalking by an intimate partner, focusing for the first time on victimization by sexual orientation. It finds a victimization prevalence of 43.8 percent for lesbians, making it the second most affected group after bisexual women (61.1 percent), ahead of bisexual men (37.3 percent), heterosexual women (35 percent), heterosexual men (29 percent) and homosexual men (26 percent).[8]
So it appears that the only ones in the alphabet community not beating the snot out each other are the "G"s.
![]()
Another slippery slope fallacy. Take the hospital for example, the Labour and delivery is segregated from the rest of the hospital. The patient there have an extra layer of security(need wrist bands to come in and locked doors), the unit has bigger room, better nurse to patient ratio, the nurse wear a different uniform and you as a floor nurse will never be floated to L&D for any reason. They do this explicitly to protect them.
They are not made prisoners and other patient population punished for it. I don't necessarily support this move but I am under no illusion that this move would lead to anything that archaic.
I'm not for or against the move. I just find it odd that the same society that thinks women need their own trains in order to be protected from "evil men" think that men should be able to go into the women's bathroom just because they say "I feel like a woman." I'm not talking about men who've actually gone through gender reassignment surgery (they have a mental disorder and need help and love). I'm talking about men who just throw on a wig and say "I'm a woman today!" The "gender is fluid" argument allows for that. Oh, and I thought saying the women needed protecting was chauvinistic?
FTR women in labor and delivery mostly need protection from other women. There have been cases of childless women stealing newborns and pretending to be their mothers.
Gender fluidity and people who take advantage of it are real, but my guess is that it is a small minority for the govt to overlook. But men feeling up women in buses and train carrages are real. Not sure it is a big enough problem to institute this policy. But it is real and it is mostly perpetuated by other men on women.
Yes, the L&D segregation policy example in most hospitals are real and it is usually put in to protect women and children from other people (mostly other women) trying to steal their newborn or even harm them. The reason why I pointed it out is not to say that men are particularly evil but instead to illustrate that segregation can be used for good. These words like segregation didn't have a negative contation to them before Jim Crow and segregation on some level is not going to lead us back to Jim Crow
Satire and irony do not exist in Nigeria?
![]()
Gender fluidity is a myth created by social engineers seeking to destroy society by simultaneously pussifying men, codifying mental disorders as something to be celebrated, and erasing boundaries set up to protect women from predators, while at the same time advocating "safe spaces" for those same women. Come on man. Think this through. If men are such predators that women have to be concerned about being felt up on a bus, then women should also worry about men, pretending to be women, putting a cell phone camera under a stall when they drop their panties to pee. And that happens more than the left would care to admit. Example?
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/l...Mall-Bathroom-Stall-Police-Say-351232041.html
No disagreement. The point that I'm making is that the same people who say "Segregate trains to protect women" are saying "Desegregate bathrooms because....well....why again? Oh that's right. Gender is fluid."
It's a buch of moronic crap!