UFO recorded by CNN today over the National Mall

More Speculation

It's a bird that is pretty damn close to the camera.
 
Looks like a bird to me. If it's not a bird, it's a very fast mechanism that uses vertical-moving "wings" to propel itself through the air.
 
ufomj7.jpg


upper right hand corner, just above the tower. that ain't no bird.
 
ufomj7.jpg


upper right hand corner, just above the tower. that ain't no bird.

That blur could be a blimp :D - Too bad it's just a bird, (that swoops a bit after it passes between the lens and the Washington Monument.

:rolleyes:

Can you imagine if we flew our blimp yesterday :eek::D
 
people say its a bird but i can honestly say i have no freakin clue what it is. The speed of the thing is what gets me. That was FAST! Of course i am no expert on this and to be honest i am usually wrong when it comes to this stuff.
 
More Speculation

It's a bird that is pretty damn close to the camera.

Exactly. I'm certain that there is intelligent life out there somewhere in the universe, but this is a bird. The bird is relatively close to the camera that is focused on a far object. Look up what they call "rods," and look up the debunking of those "things" that are really insects flying very close to the camera. This is the same phenomenon.
 
Come on guys. $140 million. One. Hundred. Forty. Million.

I could buy a lot of cool UAV shit for that much money (well, I couldn't, but that's practically a blank check for the secret service). It was probably flying around taking photographs with a wide aperture lens in quick succession, reporting them back to a guy in a van down the street, and if anything looked suspicious, they could send in the guys with helmets and plastic handcuffs.
 
am i looking at the right video? i just see a bird gliding across the screen LOL

is the video "a double message to muslims?"?
 
Assumptions & Observations


  • "object" is flying well below 500ft at speeds in excess of 400MPH
  • The "object" is large and flying at least 1200ft away from the camera
  • there is no reaction from the people on the ground
  • CNN live feeds are delayed


Analysis


  • Even if the aircraft incorporated a silent propulsion system, pressure wave cause by atmospheric disruptions from "object" would have affected people on the ground, who would have reacted in some way. (Some noise would have been created resulting from pressure wave).
  • CNN producers had time to cut-away from this view and broadcast alternative footage, but they chose not to.


Conclusion


  • CNN wanted viewers to see this footage. (If they didn't want us to see it, they wouldn't have let us see it).
  • Footage was doctored, with object digitally inserted during video production. (Digital object had to be added during video production, cause it would have caused a pressure wave that would have made noise, even if the propulsion system was silent. Hence, people on the ground would have reacted if this "object" was real and flew only a few hundred feet over their heads).
  • The people that perpetrated this "event" wish to be appear strong and in possession of extremely advanced technology.
  • This is "Psychological Persecution" directed at the American public.


Speculation


  • Footage was doctored for the disinfo circuit. This will get Internet forums talking about this for months. (i.e. big time waster for profane).
  • The people that perpetrated this are weaker then they appear, for if they were strong they would not have to feign strength via digital gimmickry.
+1
 
Its a bird. The connection speed for the camera there is a little slower than regular tv speed, there it seems to slip past at a faster rate than we are accustomed to seeing.

As far as the et thing. All I have to say is 'sons of god', 'daughters of men', 'elijah and the chariot of fire', 'tubalcain' & 'by definition if there is terrestrial, there is extra'

:)
 
My point in bringing this topic up is...we need to have disclosure on UFO's whether true or untrue. The reason being...you think if those technologies are ours we aren't already slaves to them? Seriously, all the pee shooters you guys have to defend your liberties isn't jack if our government has this technology. That may be why they do what they want without regard to what people want.

There are people number crunching the distance traveled. Some state based on the fact the object went behind the tree on the far side in under 2 seconds covered half a mile in that 2 seconds. Assuming it were a bird when it appears behind the tree the people on the ground in front of the tree are half the size as the object.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top