U.S. Shale-Oil Boom May Not Last as Fracking Wells Lack Staying Power

Zippyjuan

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
49,008
Oil shale may be booming right now but maintaining output is getting harder and harder. Some say output will peak as soon as 2016 or 2017 and then decline. Production on a typical shale well falls by 69% within just one year- one that was producing say 1000 barrels a day falls to only 300 barrels a day (a more traditional well loses about 50% after two years but can still keep that rate for up to 20 years). To keep things going, you have to continuously keep drilling more and more wells- just to stay where you are today.

http://www.businessweek.com/article...not-last-as-fracking-wells-lack-staying-power

Highlights:
The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that about 29 percent of U.S. oil production today comes from so-called tight oil formations. These dense layers of rock and shale are cracked open by blasting water, sand, and chemicals deep underground, creating fissures that allow the oil to flow into horizontal pipes, some of them thousands of feet long. Production from wells bored into these formations declines by 60 percent to 70 percent in the first year alone, says Allen Gilmer, chairman and chief executive officer of Drillinginfo, which tracks the performance of U.S. wells. Traditional wells take two years to slide 50 percent to 55 percent, and they can keep pumping for 20 years or more.

Global Sustainability’s Hughes estimates the U.S. needs to drill 6,000 new wells per year at a cost of $35 billion to maintain current production. His research also shows that the newest wells aren’t as productive as those drilled in the first years of the boom, a sign that oil companies have already tapped the best spots, making it that much harder to keep breaking records. Hughes has predicted that production will peak in 2017 and fall to 2012 levels within two years.

“The hype about U.S. energy independence and ‘Saudi America’ is deafening if you look at the mainstream media,” Hughes says. “We need to have a much more in-depth and intelligent discussion about this.” On Oct. 7, Abdalla Salem el-Badri, OPEC’s secretary general, said at a conference in Kuwait that U.S. shale producers are “running out of sweet spots” and that output will peak in 2018.

Cost are higher too than conventional wells. Intersting info on what it takes to run an oil shale well:

In September, Steve Slawson, vice president for Slawson Exploration, sat in a trailer about 35 miles north of Oklahoma City, watching monitors as his crew shattered the Mississippi lime thousands of feet below. The well, known as Begonia 1-30H, will cost about $3.7 million. One-third of that is the cost of fracking: First, thin pipes loaded with explosives are threaded into the hole to blast the ancient reef. Then, at a cost of about $80,000, the Begonia will consume 50,000 gallons of hydrochloric acid to dissolve the limestone; another $68,000 will pay for 1,000 gallons of antibacterial solution to kill microorganisms that chew up the pipes; $110,000 goes for a soapy surfactant to reduce friction; $10,000 covers a scale inhibitor to prevent lime buildup; and $230,000 purchases 2 million pounds of sand to prop the fractures open so the oil and gas can flow into the well. Then there’s $300,000 in pumping charges, plus the cost of equipment rental, pipe, and water, which brings the price tag for fracking the well to $1.2 million. A host of other things, from cement to Porta Potty rentals, accounts for the rest of the cost.

There’s little doubt Begonia will produce oil, Slawson says. The question is whether it will be enough to cover the cost of drilling and how quickly. Slawson Exploration’s first Mississippi lime horizontal well, the nearby Wolf 1-29H, produced the equivalent of almost 1,185 barrels a day when it started flowing last year and has paid for itself twice over, Slawson says. After the Wolf, a third of his wells were “dogs,” and only a third have come even close to it.

Slawson sees a few more years of growth in U.S. production if prices stay high. Below $70 a barrel, the number of rigs hunting for oil will drop, and production won’t be far behind, he says. “Like anybody else who is over the age of 50 and has been through the boom-and-bust cycle, I am concerned,” he says.

Companies that borrow heavily to pay for drilling will be hit especially hard if prices decline. Since natural gas prices started falling, Chesapeake has been forced to sell off assets to pay for drilling. It’s also started cutting jobs. Chesapeake would not comment for this story.

The Bakkan region has gone through oil boom/ bust cycles about every 20 years.

A deep water oil well - our other alternative- in the Gulf can cost a $1 billion just to drill a hole.
 
Last edited:
Wow, without a profit I'm amazed that anyone would drill in the first place. Guess it's good that there are other shelves beside the Bakkans.
 
Oil shale may be booming right now but maintaining output is getting harder and harder. Some say output will peak as soon as 2016 or 2017 and then decline. Production on a typical shale well falls by 69% within just one year- one that was producing say 1000 barrels a day falls to only 300 barrels a day (a more traditional well loses about 50% after two years but can still keep that rate for up to 20 years). To keep things going, you have to continuously keep drilling more and more wells- just to stay where you are today.

http://www.businessweek.com/article...not-last-as-fracking-wells-lack-staying-power

Highlights:




Cost are higher too than conventional wells. Intersting info on what it takes to run an oil shale well:



The Bakkan region has gone through oil boom/ bust cycles about every 20 years.

A deep water oil well - our other alternative- in the Gulf can cost a $1 billion just to drill a hole.


New technology has already been developed to massively curtail the costs of Fracking. IE Schlumberger's new HIWAY Method:

http://www.slb.com/hiway.aspx

hiway_infographic_speedbump.ashx


So, don't fall for these flawed research studies which don't take into account: Technological innovation.
 
Last edited:
Then there was this story today as well:
http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20131015/2cd301ca-39ca-4dc5-a002-ea6f5a471400

Booming oil towns prepare for inevitable bust

MIDLAND, Texas (AP) — In a faded West Texas town dotted with vacant buildings and potholed streets is a sparkling storefront window and a curious display: rows of diamond-studded Rolex watches, awaiting buyers whose pockets are packed with oil money.

The surge in oil drilling has drawn money and men like a magnet to run-down communities that haven't seen a boom since the 1980s.

But leaders and residents here are increasingly mindful that the runaway riches tapped by hydraulic fracturing will eventually run out. And they are determined to live by a fondly remembered bumper sticker from the last bust: Please, God, give me another oil boom and I promise not to blow it. So some towns are taking steps to ensure they land softly rather than crash into economic ruin.

"Don't go overboard. It's not going to last," Midland Mayor Wes Perry wants to shout, as a reminder to his own neighbors and a warning to communities in Pennsylvania and elsewhere that have never boomed like this, let alone endured a bust on par with the one Texas experienced a generation ago.

For now, Midland is the picture of prosperity. Since 2008, sales tax revenue has shot up from $24 million a year to more than $38 million in 2013. The unemployment rate is the lowest in Texas, hovering just above 3 percent. The town has hundreds of unfilled jobs.

A local Subway pays $15 an hour with a $1,000 starting bonus. Housing is so scarce that modest hotel rooms go for $300 a night.

This, longtime residents know, is what an oil boom looks like. And it's always been followed by a steep, painful decline.

When the energy market finally fades, the town wants to avoid being burdened with crushing debt or too many employees. So sales tax revenue is used only for one-time projects, such as street repairs. Police officers are hired piecemeal, two or three a year, as the population increases.

Instead of using municipal money to lure an investor to build a proposed high-rise project, the city will instead provide an 80 percent tax break on revenues for five years.

"Companies don't screw up in bad times. They screw up in good times. Same for cities," Perry said.

That lesson was learned a generation ago. Midland and Odessa, along with parts of North Dakota, boomed in the late 1970s. The windfall enabled people to buy jets and Rolls-Royces and build mansions and lakefront homes. Then in the early 1980s, the bottom fell out of the oil barrel.

The same people went bankrupt. Home foreclosures skyrocketed. Banks failed. People moved away. Homes and downtown buildings were abandoned.

"It was awful to live through that," the mayor said, recalling "Black Friday" — Oct. 14, 1983. That is the day the First National Bank of Midland, which loaned money so people could finance lavish lifestyles, collapsed under the weight of a plummeting oil market. The "majors" — or big oil companies — fled for greener pastures abroad.

The most recent boom has largely been ushered in by new hydraulic fracturing technologies combined with horizontal drilling. Those systems allow once out-of-reach oil and gas to be extracted from rock.

The big boys are back, and Midland and Odessa have seen their populations rise by at least 10 percent since 2010, not counting all those living in trailers or trucks.

It's the newcomers, suddenly earning $2,000 and more a week, who are spending, said Judy Farris, general manager of The Bar in Midland and a lifelong resident.

"You can tell the difference between the people who have been here and been through it and those that haven't," said the 58-year-old.

"People are enjoying their money, but they're wiser," she added, sitting in the darkened tavern and restaurant where local lore says countless multimillion-dollar oil deals have been cut on the backs of napkins and with a handshake over a beer.

Rolls Royce hasn't reopened its dealership. There aren't as many mansions going up. And Perry is taking heat for offering tax breaks for the proposed high-rise.

"They've been through this before. They believe when this happens, the bust is upon us," Perry said.

Just ask those in North Dakota's oil patch. Williston, in the heart of the Bakken shale petroleum reserves, was left in the 1980s with $28 million in debt and saddled with abandoned trailer parks.

But now the state leads the nation in population growth, boasts a nearly $2 billion budget surplus and has the lowest jobless rate in the nation, as well as 21,000 unfilled positions. A study released in July estimates Williston's population has doubled since the 2010 census to between 25,000 and 33,000 people. And that may not account for all those in "man camps," the hastily built communities of tents and trailers that house thousands of oil workers.

Mayor Ward Koeser believes the city is doing a better job than it did in the 1970s.

"The big thing is it's given us opportunity," he said. "We were too small and too remote to make things happen without it."

Some decisions, however, indicate memory may be short. Williston is building a community center so large a Walmart Supercenter could fit inside. Funded by the city's sales tax collections, it will have an Olympic-size swimming pool, basketball and tennis courts, a running track, a golf simulator and other features. It's designed to keep oilmen busy when they aren't working and encourage their families to move in, Koeser said.

More at link.
 
Wow, without a profit I'm amazed that anyone would drill in the first place. Guess it's good that there are other shelves beside the Bakkans.

Indeed, prices have to be up (or there has to be subsidization) before it ever gets done. It isn't like this is anything new. Shale oil has been common knowledge around here since the Glenn Pool and Drumwright pools dried up in the 1970s.

There are lots of energy alternatives which make no economic sense so long as we can get petroleum cheap. The Military Industrial Complex favors kicking the Middle East's asses and taking their oil; if it weren't for that we'd be using all kinds of techniques by now.
 
My town went through it. I'm glad round one is over. The trucks were working my last nerve. It's quiet again. But it won't last. They'll be back, they're not done.
 
Oct 15 (Reuters) - The United States has overtaken Saudi Arabia to become the world's biggest oil producer as the jump in output from shale plays has led to the second biggest oil boom in history, according to leading U.S. energy consultancy PIRA

"(The U.S.) growth rate is greater than the sum of the growth of the next nine fastest growing countries combined and has covered most of the world's net demand growth over the past two years," PIRA Energy Group wrote.

"The U.S. position as the largest oil supplier in the world looks to be secure for many years," it added.



http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/15/us-oil-pira-idUSL1N0I51IX20131015
 
Last edited:
Actually if you only look at oil, we are not #1- even if you look at the article you linked. Natural gas pushed us over the top.

Total liquids produced by the United States, which PIRA defined broadly to include supplies such as crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and biofuels, should average 12.1 million bpd in 2013, pushing it ahead of last year's No. 1 supplier, Saudi Arabia.

The United States still lagged both Saudi Arabia and Russia in production of just crude oil by abut 3 million bpd, PIRA noted. Rounding out the top 10 oil suppliers were China, Canada, UAE, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and Mexico.
 
New technology has already been developed to massively curtail the costs of Fracking. IE Schlumberger's new HIWAY Method:

http://www.slb.com/hiway.aspx

hiway_infographic_speedbump.ashx


So, don't fall for these flawed research studies which don't take into account: Technological innovation.

I have worked for SLB and let me tell you, we charge the highest per fracked stage in the entire industry. If those numbers posted in the original article for pumping and materials are correct, think again.

A stage averages (with all materials and labor included) upwards of 150,000. And there's usually 20 per well. So these fracked wells are NOT cheap. It's almost better for the oil company who hires the fracking companies to go with the smaller, cheaper fracking company even though they will do a worse job and yield less production.

OP is correct in pointing out these wells do not have a future. We simply cannot replace the decline in old oilfields with fracked wells.

If you think about it, we used to get oil by putting a straw in the ground and sucking it up. Now we put a straw sideways for miles and puncture rocks to get natural gas and shale oil. Which do you think returns more net energy....? It's the first one.

We're on a net energy time bomb, as anyone who has examined the data can see plainly.
 
Yes wells do eventually run dry, that was known a long time ago, however there is plenty of gas in the United States, enough to provide a generation of drillers work at the least, it will fall off eventually, but in the meantime lets make some money from it. Many drilling companies ceased operations in marcellus shale drilling a few years ago when the price fell heavily and turned to other operations such as oil, not all ceased but production slowed way down. It has picked back up as the price of gas is going back up. The US is going to start shipping massive amounts of gas to Japan, which will drive our price up also, but is going to actually generate this country some outside money and make a lot of people very wealthy. I am very happy about it, but I just hope they do it safely without ruining our water systems.
 
Oh and I should have also mentioned that it was also known for a long time that you cant sit in one spot drilling forever and keep getting gas, you have to keep moving around
 
Oil shale may be booming right now but maintaining output is getting harder and harder. Some say output will peak as soon as 2016 or 2017 and then decline. Production on a typical shale well falls by 69% within just one year- one that was producing say 1000 barrels a day falls to only 300 barrels a day (a more traditional well loses about 50% after two years but can still keep that rate for up to 20 years). To keep things going, you have to continuously keep drilling more and more wells- just to stay where you are today.
...

Yeah, a blog I read periodically touches on this from time to time:
...
There is a great deal of energy disinformation published on the MSM and internet. Several of the well-known alternative media analysts on the internet have been beating the drum for shale oil & gas. Even though shale energy has been a boost to the U.S. economy, it will not be long-lived — regardless of the hype and overly optimistic forecasts.

One of the most recent energy falsehoods being advertised, is that the U.S. is now the largest oil producer in the world surpassing Russia & Saudi Arabia. Stansberry & Associates published this recent chart showing the U.S. as the number one oil producer:

{chart}

According to Stansberry & Associates, the United States is on top with approximately 12+ million barrels a day (mbd) of oil production, while Saudi Arabia comes in at 11+ mbd and Russia at over 10 mbd. These figures are from the EIA – U.S. Energy Information Agency, and do not equate as “OIL”, but rather they represent the amount of total energy liquids.

Because the United States consumes so much oil, it is refining between 15-16 mbd of oil. Thus it records over 1 mbd of refining gains. Refining gains occur because you actually end up with a little more volume than you put in due to the refining and cracking process. Saudi Arabia and Russia export the majority of their oil so they don’t have much in refining gains.

The chart below comes from the PeakOilBarrel.com which I highly recommend checking out as Ron Patterson does a great job presenting updated U.S. and world oil & gas data.

{chart}

Here we can see that the U.S. enjoys a huge refining gain because it refines and consumes so much oil. Furthermore, that U.S. 12+ mbd Total Liquid figure also includes what is known as natural gas plant liquids and other liquids such as bio-fuels.

These energy liquids are not considered as oil by the industry. What is considered as oil, is called “crude & condensate.” If we were to go by the industry standard for oil, this is an update on how the chart should look:

{chart}

The reason why it is important to differentiate between the “oil” & “total liquids” is that crude oil is the higher dollar, higher energy content and more sought after liquid. Also, the U.S. is only producing approximately 7.7 mbd of actual crude & condensate while Saudi Arabia is pumping out 10 mbd and Russia 10.3 mbd.

So, for the United States to outperform these two countries, it needs to add 2.3-2.5 mbd of oil production. To present the chart as Top Oil Producers is disingenuous, if you are including less quality energy liquids that do not qualify as oil.
...

More (incl. charts): http://srsroccoreport.com/the-key-f...-key-factor-to-push-gold-silver-to-new-highs/
 
Humm, so the decline curve is pretty big. These stupid oil and gas companies are gonna lose billions. To bad they didn't read the articles. maybe they should just start plugging all those producing wells cause their gonna lose production at a high rate. lets not forget that the USA can't be number one in production so might as well pack that in too. And this damn glut of natural gas keeping the price of home heating down, that's gonna decline too. Oh, and the local economies, thriving and bringing money and WORK into the areas. Shame that they will be ghost towns in a hundred years. Might as well give up now.

I am failing to see the negative impact here..... Seriously, why wouldn't we explore and produce the resourses available to us for; employment, lower energy prices, self-sufficiency, keeping our frn's in our own country, growth of local residents & business...
 
Couldnt agree more sam1952, drilling is a huge blessing to our economy, why are people seeing it negatively. Its like saying our sun is going to eventually burn out, so its no good. Just because there is internet blogs saying it is almost over doesnt mean jack. Drilling and the gas industry will be here for a long time, unless of course the government tampers with it and shuts it down, which I could easily foresee happening if government gets overrun by democrats. I am not personally in the industry but I get my information directly and I mean directly from the drillers, so I am much more inclined to believe them than internet blogs
 
Back
Top