U.S Banks Told To Prepare For Total Collapse!

why dont you go research alex's "insider sources" , "secret documents" or "unnamed whistle blowers" ? oh thats right you cant , because its always bullshit . just like this .

Nah, what he was reporting came from reuters. You didn't realize it, made yourself look like a fool and now won't even admit to it. You get more pathetic with each post.
 
The more I research, the more positive I am that the world economy is completely fucked. Even if you haven't done any research, you've got to have noticed that we've been in a worldwide recession for four years now. It seems like it's getting better here, but go over to europe and it's rapidly getting worse and worse. News articles from Greece read like they're from a third-world country.

As for conspiracies, there are things that line up a little too well to be the result of mass stupidity, but I don't see everything as one grand conspiracy. If you believe in a free market, what you have to realize is that the top layers of society function as one. Since corporations and government bleed into one another, the top layers are effectively deregulated. Conspiracies are decentralized and self-emergent. There are a few key values and a few key necessities, and anything that happens comes from those ideas.

The key values are what they always have been -- accumulate more wealth and accumulate more power. The key necessities are to remove all obstacles to those occuring. So for example, privacy and civil liberties are being curtailed because if the 99% are not watched, they become unpredictable and acquiring wealth and power becomes more difficult. There's a strong trend towards controlling or heavily watching the internet, because of its ability to inform and organize the 99%. And one thing I've noticed is a necessity of infiltrating groups that serve as an alternative to the banking industry. But actions against these are not completely coordinated by everyone at the top, because they all have different priorities and are in competition with one another. A lot of them are really just normal people too.
 
Yea! r3volution did not receive the resolution he wanted in his 'stop the daily spamming of infowars on RPF' thread so now he is going to spam infowars. Christ! :rolleyes:
 
In this case the headline was "muted" to the point where any sting was taken out of it. Sure Janet Napolitano got sued. AGs probably get sued all the time. But why? Better headline: "Suit alleges Janet Napolitano treated male staffers like lapdogs". Sensational enough for someone to read without anything that's not proven to be true. And it's the same headline used by other MSM articles covering the story.

Very well.

Muting headline example #1.

when posted, the title of this thread was:

"Janet Napolitano’s Little Love Nest at DHS"

Since JFK had ok'd muting of headlines, it was changed to: "Thomas More Law Center files lawsuit against Janet Napalitano"

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...against-Janet-Napalitano&highlight=napalitano

JFK, due to your request, is working with people on this, which I appreciate.

They do in fact have good information before anyone else gets it sometimes.
 
In this case the headline was "muted" to the point where any sting was taken out of it. Sure Janet Napolitano got sued. AGs probably get sued all the time. But why? Better headline: "Suit alleges Janet Napolitano treated male staffers like lapdogs". Sensational enough for someone to read without anything that's not proven to be true. And it's the same headline used by other MSM articles covering the story.

Yeah, it should have mentioned the sexual harassment aspect of it
 
It is based off of this article:

Exclusive: U.S. banks told to make plans for preventing collapse

http://www.chicagotribune.com/busin...coveryplansbre87905n-20120809,0,3006538.story

Who cares if it is known to be sensational and humorous? Fight fire with fire.

They do inform a large section of the public about a number of relevant issues.

I'd have to agree. It really doesn't matter anymore. They use fear and intimidation to get what they want why don't we? At least we're not lying.

But, articles like this, with their sensational headlines, appear on the front page, if they are left on the open board. Is that the picture you want to give onlookers of this movement?

The truth is scary enough, without all the hype.

i'm pretty sure they were or will be told to prepare for the collapse. so the headline seems fine.

Let's see. r3volution posts an infowars thread in General Politics that supposedly over sensational to prove a point about how "bad" it is to have all of these over sensational headlines, only we find the title wasn't really over sensational at all. LOLz! (Oh I'm sure someone will split hairs over the difference of being told to "Try to prevent" a collapse and "preparing" for a collapse. Bottom line is, the banks are on the edge of a collapse, and the media has us talking about Chick-fil-A.)
 
oh boy the usual suspects are here , begin the alex jones circle jerk .

edit: rev9 is not here yet , hold .
 
then it must not be true , surely he would have inside info on that if it was .

All it shows is I haven't heard him say it. After all I don't listen to infowars that much. And thanks in part to you I don't have to. :p But seriously, what is your thought on the NOAA mega purchase of ammo? Nothing to worry about? Something to be concerned about? Certainly you have an opinion.
 
i love how you and the other AJ people here always throw around that term in an attempt to discount others statements or opinions as if you guys are the only ones capable of using and search engine on the internet .
guess what , 8 year olds google shit these days and dont run around claiming they "research" things .

why dont you go research alex's "insider sources" , "secret documents" or "unnamed whistle blowers" ? oh thats right you cant , because its always bullshit . just like this .

I say it, "if you researched (which is apparent you don't) you would know" because it is true. It isn't rocket science to research what Jones reports. Most are all in plain view.

Being a troll, I guess it's hard for you to research eh?
 
If there's a big conspiracy to control the worlds wealth what is the end game?

Not sure what the end game is than simply more control over the people, hence the NWO. You get everyone under that same control, you control that one currency.

Swiss scientists did research in regards to who controls the world's wealth. It's called the "bow tie structure." They looked at over 43,000 transnational corporations world wide and found an interesting stat - the world's wealth and money making is controlled by a "super entity" of 147 companies in which 75% of were financial institutions.

WHO CONTROLS THE WORLD'S WEALTH??? A Must Read! Click Here for an amazing break down.
 
So if these 147 companies already control the wealth what are they after?

There's got to be some sort of desired outcome and from my vantage point a one world currency would serve no purpose to those who already control the money supply.

How would this change things?

Not sure what the end game is than simply more control over the people, hence the NWO. You get everyone under that same control, you control that one currency.

Swiss scientists did research in regards to who controls the world's wealth. It's called the "bow tie structure." They looked at over 43,000 transnational corporations world wide and found an interesting stat - the world's wealth and money making is controlled by a "super entity" of 147 companies in which 75% of were financial institutions.

WHO CONTROLS THE WORLD'S WEALTH??? A Must Read! Click Here for an amazing break down.
 
tell that to the countless people that were cursed out of this forum (or elsewhere ) for not agreeing with him or his 911 conspiracy . i have seen it with my own eyes at meetups / here / daily paul / infowars / ect... however ill probably be banned for finally speaking up about it after i kept my mouth shut till the rand endorsement , all the while being openly called names and insulted even when i try to address the issue in a civil matter . heck , it even got more attention in this thread than in the feedback section (i mean by mods/admins) .

i know people here think i dislike truthers or conspiracy theorists , but i do not . i actually enjoy it like entertainment . i briefly listened to cooper , jones and still listen to coast to coast , however when i see people that are attacked by droves of jones supporters for not agreeing with their version of 911 or another theory and being chased away it pisses me off . its kinda like they are trying to hijack this place for their movement when they already have multiple outlets for it . and yes , in my mind im like "i bit my tongue for years , why cant you " ?

that was a vent , lol ..

Wow...what a little crybaby.Someone needs a Waaaaaaambulance I think.
 
I've been a big follower of Infowars for many years. However one of the biggest complaints of A.J. is that while he gives us important censored information, he NEVER exposes what is behind all of this - The Rothschilds/ Zionism. I have recently heard that this is completely intentional, and that he is really working for THEM. It is a classic example of feeding the masses true information so that we remain satisfied, while keeping the source of all this tyranny hidden. Just passing this along.

Or is that what you WANT US TO THINK? I'm on to you, reptilian... It's really the lizard people from the planet Glaergesh that have created an elaborate conspiracy theory to make us think that the jews are behind an elaborate conspiracy theory to dominate the world.
 
because it is obvious many people take it very seriously (even here) 2 wrongs do not make a right , especially when its for profit .

however 3 lefts make a right i think ?

Ooh, profit is so evil. Run away.

Give me a break and stop starting flame wars.
 
Please at least say you have 50 gallons of drinkable water for each person in the house. If it's just you and you don't have kids, then I understand. If you're just here to whine about Jones, don't be a dick regarding people who care about those around them and have contingency plans. Seriously.

Let me know where I'm wrong on that.






Given the centralized power and federal reserve actions or police state response to people starving, maybe you should rethink that. In theory, "Nobody is going to die from incorrect economic predictions." In reality, it could happen, and it could happen a lot. It has happened plenty in history.

Following that logic, anything could happen as a result of anything. I wouldn't worry too much about the implications of a news article.
 
Back
Top