TX Man Sentenced to Life in Prison for 9th DWI

[Origanalist]

Take your "ordered" idea of liberty and march it goose-step whence you came, I'll have no part of it.

Reported.

 

[AGRP]

How about some creative, liberty inspired, solutions besides locking him away and pointless cat fights?

 

[torchbearer]

Not in my State- the thuggie would be dead and the Citizen who planted him would be a hero.

this statement says more about this poster than I ever could.

 

[truelies]

.......Based on your attitude, I think the likelihood of you possibly hurting someone is very high...

hmmmm, not unless their obvious irresponsibility harms me or mine.

But, hey you do agree that if your drunk/drugged driving kills one of my kids/grandkids/cousins THEN I get to settle your hash any way I choose, right?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Not near as much as YOU are trying to excuse murderous personal behaviour just because it happens to be one of your personal vices. Liberty is NOT the same thing as License, Fool.

Umm, I don't drink.

How could it be my "personal vice"?

But, you make my point, unless you really are trolling.

A "vice" is not a crime, fool.

 

[truelies]

this statement says more about this poster than I ever could.

Thats just the way life is in more States than not. Go around behaving in an obvious dangerous manner and folks WILL assert their right to self-protection. Ya don't wanna get hurt, don't behave in a dangerous threatening manner.

 

[Anti Federalist]

hmmmm, not unless their obvious irresponsibility harms me or mine.

But, hey you do agree that if your drunk/drugged driving kills one of my kids/grandkids/cousins THEN I get to settle your hash any way I choose, right?

So, you hate the bill of rights, then, correct?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Thats just the way life is in more States than not. Go around behaving in an obvious dangerous manner and folks WILL assert their right to self-protection. Ya don't wanna get hurt, don't behave in a dangerous threatening manner.

So an 80 year old grandmother who is driving erratically, gets to be summarily executed by the mob on the side of the road if she hits somebody with her car?

 

[AGRP]

hmmmm, not unless their obvious irresponsibility harms me or mine.

But, hey you do agree that if your drunk/drugged driving kills one of my kids/grandkids/cousins THEN I get to settle your hash any way I choose, right?

Depends. There was a case around here when a farmer caught a farm hand raping his daughter and the farm hand died from head trauma. Cops were called and he was only charged with assault and battery I believe. The man is considered a hero.

 

[truelies]

Umm, I don't drink.

How could it be my "personal vice"?

But, you make my point, unless you really are trolling.

A "vice" is not a crime, fool.

never said drinking by itself was a crime. I did say that driving while drunk is an attack on the rest of the community which merits permanent removal from Society. YOU did seem to imply that you drove drunk as a youth & thought it no big deal. Sooooo about the only point I made is that you seem to be of the sort who thinks license is the main constituent of Liberty. If so you are a dangerous Fool.

 

[torchbearer]

Thats just the way life is in more States than not. Go around behaving in an obvious dangerous manner and folks WILL assert their right to self-protection. Ya don't wanna get hurt, don't behave in a dangerous threatening manner.

you love violence and you live out that lust through government.

 

[Anti Federalist]

never said drinking by itself was a crime. I did say that driving while drunk is an attack on the rest of the community which merits permanent removal from Society. YOU did seem to imply that you drove drunk as a youth & thought it no big deal. Sooooo about the only point I made is that you seem to be of the sort who thinks license is the main constituent of Liberty. If so you are a dangerous Fool.

How can there be an "attack" if there was no victim?

Yes, I did.

So did lots of other people.

We did lots of other things as well.

I would trade that world for today's surveillance state, instantly.

 

[truelies]

So an 80 year old grandmother who is driving erratically, gets to be summarily executed by the mob on the side of the road if she hits somebody with her car?

Nope, but she gets to spend her remaining days on the miscreant res and her Property gets confiscated to 100% of the amount required to make her vics whole.......and YES if one dies so should she.


Why do you have such trouble with personal responsibilty, sport?

 

[tod evans]

hmmmm, not unless their obvious irresponsibility harms me or mine.

But, hey you do agree that if your drunk/drugged driving kills one of my kids/grandkids/cousins THEN I get to settle your hash any way I choose, right?

If you actually do have grandchildren you are of my vintage, and I must say I'm ashamed of the attitudes and beliefs you profess.

You should be old enough to know better, especially if you've ever seen a "work-boot"...

Even more important, you, at your age, should be well aware of how "our government" is the antithesis of freedom and liberty.

 

[tod evans]

I did say that driving while drunk is an attack on the rest of the community which merits permanent removal from Society.

From earlier in this thread just for you..

Laws are written and rewritten daily, they're perverted and twisted by prosecutors/judges and lawyers to fit agendas.

Public sentiment, such as you have expressed regarding drunk drivers, contributes drastically to their perversion.

Whether or not you realize it you are being played like a fiddle by the propaganda arm of government.

 

[truelies]

How can there be an "attack" if there was no victim?

...........

Shot at me and miss- its still an attack.

Driving while impaired is such trouble brewing for those around you that it does in fact constitute an attack. AS TO NO VIC- yeah right you drive up the sidewalk utterly impaired & miss my kid by inches ONLY because I jerked him/her & me to safety. No vic????? Only in the mind of an irresponsible bullshitter who feels his 'right' to drink & drive trumps other folks life & limb.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Nope, but she gets to spend her remaining days on the miscreant res and her Property gets confiscated to 100% of the amount required to make her vics whole.......and YES if one dies so should she.


Why do you have such trouble with personal responsibilty, sport?

Because your version of "responsibility" is indicative of harsh, warped and twisted sense of justice, that would have street mobs executing poorly driving grandmothers.

Have a drink and a drive, and relax, "sport".

 

[Anti Federalist]

Shot at me and miss- its still an attack.

Driving while impaired is such trouble brewing for those around you that it does in fact constitute an attack. AS TO NO VIC- yeah right you drive up the sidewalk utterly impaired & miss my kid by inches ONLY because I jerked him/her & me to safety. No vic????? Only in the mind of an irresponsible bullshitter who feels his 'right' to drink & drive trumps other folks life & limb.

It may be an "attempted" attack or murder.

Many of my rights could pose risk to your life and limb.

Many of yours could do the same to me.

Liberty is Risky.

Violently oppressive authoritarianism is "safe".

 

[truelies]

................I must say I'm ashamed of the attitudes and beliefs you profess.

............................

Yeah, I am not to broken up by your disapproval, uncle.


When/if you ever figure out the difference between Liberty and the license displayed by a self-absorbed cretin let me know, k.

 

[Anti Federalist]

If you actually do have grandchildren you are of my vintage, and I must say I'm ashamed of the attitudes and beliefs you profess.

You should be old enough to know better, especially if you've ever seen a "work-boot"...

Even more important, you, at your age, should be well aware of how "our government" is the antithesis of freedom and liberty.

I think we're being trolled, but I could be wrong.