TX - hospital said it stopped trans surgeries on kids - leaked docs prove they have not

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,557
Sex-Change Procedures at Texas Children’s Hospital

https://www.city-journal.org/article/sex-change-procedures-at-texas-childrens-hospital

May 16 2023 By Chris Rufo

Doctors said that they would stop such medical interventions. Whistleblower documents prove that they haven’t.

Last spring, executives at Texas Children’s Hospital announced that they would cease performing transgender medical procedures on children, citing potential legal and criminal liability. The hospital’s chief pediatrician, Catherine Gordon, an advocate for “gender-affirming therapy,” abruptly resigned.

I have obtained exclusive whistleblower documents showing that, despite its public statements, the Houston-based children’s hospital—the largest in the United States—has secretly continued to perform transgender medical interventions, including the use of implantable puberty blockers, on minor children. (When reached via email, hospital spokeswoman Kelley Carville responded: “We have no comment.”)

As an institution, Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) has openly promoted “gender-affirming care” to its physicians. In January of this year, TCH and Baylor College of Medicine, which works in partnership with the children’s hospital, hosted a “pediatric grand rounds” presentation titled “Medical and Psychological Care of Gender-Diverse Youth,” describing the process of sex-change interventions, from puberty blockers to cross-sex hormones to genital surgeries.

According to this presentation, TCH and Baylor College of Medicine encouraged doctors to begin treatment with puberty blockers and hormones during adolescence, and then consider surgeries, including breast removal and genital reconstruction, in adulthood—though the presenters explained that some surgical procedures could be appropriate for “adolescents on [a] case-by-case basis.”

Richard Roberts, a University of Virginia-trained endocrinologist and assistant professor at Baylor College of Medicine who co-presented the grand rounds, is also listed in medical records as performing transgender medical procedures on minors at TCH. According to these records, Roberts has managed patients ranging in age from 12 to 17 years old for “gender identity” and “gender dysphoria,” with indications for “medication,” “testosterone levels,” “medicine refill,” and “specialty services.”

Despite the hospital’s statement that it had ceased these practices, Roberts has continued to manage a heavy caseload for “gender-affirming care,” including multiple patient visits in a single day last week for “gender dysphoria” and “gender identity,” and another for “HRT [hormone replacement therapy].”

Another doctor at Texas Children’s, a Harvard-trained surgeon and assistant professor at Baylor College of Medicine named Kristy Rialon, has also been involved in conducting transgender surgical procedures on minors. The records indicate that Rialon inserted and removed “non-biodegradable drug delivery implant” for “gender dysphoria in pediatric patient” throughout 2022 and 2023—including one procedure on an 11-year-old “female-to-male transgender person,” listed in records for three days after the hospital had announced that it had stopped performing “gender-affirming care.”

The patients getting implants (or removals) from Rialon were 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 years old. Other medical records confirm that Rialon has administered the drug Supprelin LA, an implantable gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) medication that is one of the most commonly used drugs for blocking puberty in transgender-identified children.

The executives at Texas Children’s appear to be playing a duplicitous game. They announced that the hospital had stopped performing transgender medical interventions on minors, but this is simply untrue. TCH doctors administered such procedures days after the announcement, and they have continued to perform them throughout 2022 and 2023.

If “gender-affirming care” is truly the gold standard in medicine, TCH should defend it openly, not perform it in secret. State legislators, currently considering a bill to ban such procedures, should launch an investigation into the hospital and require those involved to account for their practices—or face severe consequences.
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1659529340386967552
RD46Mi1.png
 

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1762614754051301785


https://x.com/AndreaCohenHaim/status/1868707553271857431

Recently unsealed evidence shows that the DOJ and FBI had evidence of my husband’s (@eithanhaim) innocence 10 months before they indicted him, but they ignored it and did it anyway. ��

As reported by Fox News today (@kendall_tietz), the court unsealed two key pieces of evidence that were previously attached to a defense motion. This is the first time the public can see some of the documents that upend the DOJ’s entire theory of the case.

For context, when Eithan was indicted back in June, the DOJ’s case was that he was officially assigned to another hospital at the time, and allegedly had “no reason” to be accessing Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) medical records. The evidence shows they were so wrong that I honestly can’t explain it other than monumental incompetence (or, of course, bad faith).

(1) On August 30, 2023, TCH, through its counsel BakerHostetler, wrote a letter to HHS regarding its investigation of the alleged HIPAA breach at TCH. In it, they state unequivocally, Eithan “had approved and authorized access to TCH’s [electronic medical records]” and “TCH’s policies and procedures were followed” when he was granted access by the hospital. They also showed that he was providing coverage for patients at TCH during the relevant time period.

(2) The DOJ’s indictment apparently relied on testimony from a plastic surgeon, Dr. Larry Hollier, that Eithan had “no documented reason to access the TCH system.” Hollier never met Eithan, wasn’t even in the same specialty, and his statements were obviously contradicted by TCH’s letter. Btw, this guy also happens to sit on the board of TCH.

After being forced to acknowledge that Eithan was actually treating patients at TCH, the DOJ basically conceded that they presented false information to the grand jury. Oops! But they want us (and the court) to believe that it’s all totally fine because they say they didn’t do so “knowingly.”

One would think that presenting false information to a grand jury, whether knowingly or unknowingly, would force the DOJ to scrap this case like the garbage it is. Especially when that information is central to their theory of the case.

But no! They’re doubling down. They have gotten two more indictments since then on increasingly insane legal theories. And just as this was being exposed, they moved to gag Eithan from talking about it. That’s why I’m speaking out. See below for details (1/5).
...
(2/5) DOJ claims that Eithan accessed the system "without authorization", but TCH’s own letter to HHS states unambiguously that he was authorized.
...
(3/5) DOJ claims that Eithan requested access to TCH records under “false pretenses.” They initially said this was because he had no patients at TCH. But TCH’s own internal investigation showed that he did, and they communicated that to HHS.
...
(4/5) They admitted that their indictment was based on the testimony of Dr. Larry Hollier, a plastic surgeon (different specialty) who never even met Eithan. He said Eithan had no “documented reason” to be accessing the records at TCH…but again, TCH said something different to HHS. Obviously his testimony was factually incorrect, and DOJ ignored the contradicting evidence.

And the three people at Hollier’s interview were the same people who knew (or should have known) of TCH’s HHS letter for 10 months: Tina Ansari (former DOJ lead prosecutor), Paul Nixon (FBI agent), and TCH’s counsel (BakerHostetler).
...
(5/5) As Eithan’s counsel wrote in his opposition brief to the gag order, “the original indictment was founded on lies that in other situations would be actionable slander.” And those lies continue to plague the case today, as the minimal Second Superseding Indictment still contains the allegation that Eithan accessed information under “false pretenses.”

There's the famous quote from Stalin's head of secret police: “show me the man, I’ll show you the crime.” That’s what this case has been from the beginning. The DOJ and FBI had information in their possession that disproved their entire case all along, but ignored it in order to send a man to prison for 10 years.
 
I think that a heath care worker that has access to all the records at a facility does not have the right to be accessing records of patients they have no interactions with or are not directly involved in caring for.
So for example if I work at a hospital and there was a rumor that Johnny Depp was admitted, if I am not directly caring for Johnny, I have no right to access his records.
I could be wrong, but that is the way I think it works.
However someone in billing might have a reason to access every person's records that is delinquent. But, only for the reason of collecting what is owed.

Regardless if you are in the crosshairs of someone connected, you are doomed.

My guess is that if this Doctor was not treating those patients or actively involved with them on a professional level/capacity, he has no right looking at their records. Consider it like 20 people live in a house and you open up their USPS mail.

I don't know what their case is, but my guess is regardless of what the hospital was or was not doing, this guy is in trouble if he disclosed things that he was not authorized to disclose. Just because he has authorization to use the computer, he doesn't have authorization to records of people he is not treating. Hearing what is taking place in the break room and then going and looking up the records is probably a violation.
 
Back
Top