TX-Dallas teacher loses job after being exposed as porn star 16 years prior

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,566
Shitty situation: sounds like she called cops on drunk driver and somebody took great offense at that (cool).

This person then "doxxes" her, causing her to lose her job. (not cool).

Ron Paul woman as well.



Middle school science teacher, 38, fights to keep her job after her past as a porn star 13 years ago is exposed

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4184374/Teacher-leave-past-pornography-revealed.html

Resa-Woodward-teacher-porn-star-twitter-640x480.jpg


Resa Woodward taught sixth grade science at middle school in Dallas, Texas
Woodward said she was forced into pornography about 16 years ago by an older man she was living with during times of financial strain
She appeared in 16 films, including compilations, largely from 2001 to 2004
But she received her master's degree and became a successful teacher
In the fall 2016, a man who disagreed with her revealed her past on social media

By Jessica Chia For Dailymail.com

Published: 09:49 EST, 2 February 2017 | Updated: 17:51 EST, 2 February 2017

A middle school teacher is fighting to keep her job after it was revealed she was an adult film actress in at least 16 productions.

Resa Woodward, 38, taught sixth grade science at the Young Women's Science Technology Engineering and Math Academy at Balch Springs Middle School in Dallas, Texas, and was placed on administrative leave in late November.

Woodward said she was forced into pornography more than a decade ago, and since received a master's degree and become a successful teacher, the Dallas Morning News reported.

Resa Woodward (pictured) taught sixth grade science at the Young Women's Science Technology Engineering and Math Academy at Balch Springs Middle School

Woodward, who worked as an adult film actress under the name Robyn Foster, appeared in at least 16 films, mostly between 2001 and 2004. Some compilation films including her past performances were released as recently as 2013.

Woodward claims she was forced into pornography in times of financial strain by an older man she was living with, and said: 'That involvement was not of my own choosing.'

She decided to pursue a different career and worked in education for 15 years before the Dallas Independent School District received an anonymous tip regarding Woodward's past on March 10.

But the ensuing investigation concluded that 'Woodward’s past participation in pornography does not in itself constitute a policy violation', according to records obtained by the Dallas Morning News.

The 38-year-old said she was allowed to continue teaching as long as her past remained private, she said.

Months later, Woodward, who is an active member of the Libertarian Party of Texas, shared an experience she had calling the police on a drunk driver.

She shared the post on Facebook, and a Libertarian man from another state opposed her views of the police and revealed her past on social media.

When Woodward told the school district, they placed her on administrative leave, and said they were pursuing termination 'because it became public', she told the Dallas Morning News.

Woodward, who says she has received pay increases at the all-girls school in the last two years, also questioned what her termination would signal to her students.

She said: 'I taught in an all-girls STEAM academy that was all about empowerment for women. The sad thing is that if these girls find out that I’m being punished for something that I did nearly 20 years ago and had no control of and fought to get out of, well, what does that say about empowerment?'

Woodward has filed an appeal with the Texas Education Agency, but a spokesperson said an independent review was not going to be pursued because it was not submitted correctly.

The school district spokesperson said Woodward is still on administrative leave as an investigation continues.
 
The person who did the outing, ironically, ended up going all in for Trump. Criticizing someone else for utilizing police when you go balls deep for Trump is perplexing, at best.

He also posted constant anti-women content, mostly about exes, and occasionally about his mother. He didn't choose his relationship with his mother, but he clearly chose the relationships with his exes. He also continued to communicate with them. There's a common denominator in all of that, and it wasn't everybody else.
 
Last edited:
Months later, Woodward, who is an active member of the Libertarian Party of Texas, shared an experience she had calling the police on a drunk driver.

See something, say something.

She shared the post on Facebook, and a Libertarian man from another state opposed her views of the police and revealed her past on social media.

See something, say something.
 
Months later, Woodward, who is an active member of the Libertarian Party of Texas, shared an experience she had calling the police on a drunk driver.

See something, say something.

She shared the post on Facebook, and a Libertarian man from another state opposed her views of the police and revealed her past on social media.

See something, say something.

But this is not the same thing!:cool:
 
Sad story and even sadder that I was tempted for a short minute to look up her porn history.

Must resist
Must resist

Must resist...........
 
Woodward said she was forced into pornography about 16 years ago by an older man she was living with during times of financial strain
[]
she had calling the police on a drunk driver
[]
I’m being punished for something that I did nearly 20 years ago and had no control of and fought to get out of, well, what does that say about empowerment

Did he stick a gun in your face?
Else, drop it with the forced victim drama bullshit and be frank:
You got a roof and in voluntary exchange you gave up some legalized hooker ass on film.
Now you're wearing a freedom hat and revolution tat while ratting people out for statutory violations, more victim drama.
Then you're getting your panties in a wod when your gov't job boss fires you, for whatever reason, as if you're entitled to a job, yet more victim drama.

You're not being "punished" for anything.
You are simply not valuable to this employer any longer.
The cat is out of the bag and bossman thinks your mere presence encourages little kids to look up porn online.

Move on and get past yourself.
Actions have consequences.
 
Last edited:
The person who did the outing, ironically, ended up going all in for Trump. Criticizing someone else for utilizing police when you go balls deep for Trump is perplexing, at best.

He also posted constant anti-women content, mostly about exes, and occasionally about his mother. He didn't choose his relationship with his mother, but he clearly chose the relationships with his exes. He also continued to communicate with them. There's a common denominator in all of that, and it wasn't everybody else.

Will he get a W2 from Soros this year? Sounds too "good" to be true...

houseplant-12450911.jpg
 
Did he stick a gun in your face?
Else, drop it with the forced victim drama bull$#@! and be frank:
You got a roof and in voluntary exchange you gave up some legalized hooker ass on film.
Now you're wearing a freedom hat and revolution tat while ratting people out for statutory violations, more victim drama.
Then you're getting your panties in a wod when your gov't job boss fires you, for whatever reason, as if you're entitled to a job, yet more victim drama.

You're not being "punished" for anything.
You are simply not valuable to this employer any longer.
The cat is out of the bag and bossman thinks your mere presence encourages little kids to look up porn online.

Move on and get past yourself.
Actions have consequences.

Serious question, you are driving home from a family outing and you see a drunk driver speeding and driving in a reckless way or same scenario, driving home with wife and kids and witness a bunch of kids street racing. What do you do?

- Ignore them and drive home
- Try to resolve the problem
- or Call the cops

In my scenario I specifically made the drunk driver and street racers a danger to the public. So please answer with that in consideration.
 
Serious question, you are driving home from a family outing and you see a drunk driver speeding and driving in a reckless way or same scenario, driving home with wife and kids and witness a bunch of kids street racing. What do you do?

- Ignore them and drive home
- Try to resolve the problem
- or Call the cops

In my scenario I specifically made the drunk driver and street racers a danger to the public. So please answer with that in consideration.

1) Do you believe this individual INTENDED to cause you harm? mens rea
2) Did you apprehend imminent harm from this individual? actus reus

if not BOTH, then you have no LAWFUL claim of violence.

I don't believe in arbitrary statutory public dangers.
I believe in natural law:
No Victim = No Crime.
Ignore them and drive home.


Generally, the essential elements of assault consist of an
act intended
to cause an apprehension of harmful or offensive contact
that causes apprehension
of such contact in the victim.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Assault
 
Last edited:
There is a lesson here somewhere...

Wonder what that could be?

Just to be clear my "cool" remark was directed at the fellow who was indignant at her doing that.

At least that is what I'm assuming.

Anybody here FedBook that can post the exchange?
 
Back
Top