Even when she calls her self Rosa Parks?
But seriously, do you agree with Pamela Geller's world view.. specifically her views on Israel-Palestine dispute and primary causes of 9/11 (original) terror attacks against US? Her ad campaign suggests Israel does no wrong and Palestinians/Muslims are savages motivated to attack jews because of their religion solely but does not even mention the elephant of a factor of four deacdes old US financed Israeli occupation/oppression/slaughter of Palestinains.
To the untrained eye she comes across as a hate filled zionist extremist disowned by moderate jews and lost in some blind faith in supremacist zionism interpretations perhaps as a coping mechanism to deal with some trauma she may have suffered. Don't know much about her history or psychological catalysts behind her obsession with taunting muslims/palestinians, but even if Pam Geller lost a husband/sibling or parent in European gas chambers or in Israel-Palestinian violence which is not repeorted in recent news, hers does not seem like rational or mentally healthy behavior.
In case you still think Pam Geller is "100% right", how would you explain these terror attacks against Israel/zionists by Palestinian Christians if primary motive behind anti-zionist terror is religion? Copy paste from another discussion:
Terrorism's Christian Godfather
By Scott MacLeod/Cairo Monday, Jan. 28, 2008
"Habash's group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palest ine (P F L P), pioneered the hi jacking of airplanes as a Middle East terror tactic — one eventually employed by the al-Qaeda hi jackers on 9/11 — way back in 1968 when three P F L P armed operatives commandeered an Israel i El Al ai rliner enroute from Rome to Tel Aviv. Checking in for a flight has never been the same since.
Many P F L P operations remain etched into history as some of the most infamous acts of terrorism. In 1970, P F L P terrorists hijacked four air liners at one time, flew three of them to Jordan, blew them up, and triggered the Black September civil war between Jordan's Hashemite monarchy and Palestinian guerrillas. In 1972, Japanese Red Army terrorists working with the PFLP massacred 24 people at Israel's Lod International Air port (now called B e n G u r i o n International Air port).
What led Habash, a Christian physician — hence his nickname al-Hakim or the doctor — into such a life, of revolution, of killing? The son of a well-to-do merchant, he was trained at the American University of Beirut, the most liberal university in the Middle East then as now. His background was almost identical to that of his best friend, Wadia Haddad, the No. 2 in the PFLP and the operational genius and passionate proponent of the group's terrorist acts. When I asked Habash that question during a series of interviews many years ago, he simply told me about his personal experiences when his family lost its home during israel's 1948 War of Independence, what the Palestinians call the C a t a s t r o p h e."
http://www.time.com/time/world/artic...707366,00.html
Bobby Kennedy assassinated by a Palestinian Christian after listening to Bobby's pro Israel speech on TV
Palestinian Christian leader in Canada: Shoot Israeli Jews if they don’t leave Jerusalem
Canada's largest Church joins boycott Israel campaign
9/11 was to punish U.S. for Israel policy: Philip Zelikow 9/11 Commission Exec. Dir.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHely2_KkC4&list=PLfrlsC1yJ2dRtvvzX47VwYbu6X-cQuvMM
Again, no one is harmed by speech.
Your premise is no longer true in the modern freedom era it seems, outcome of free speech may depend on the race/religion of the person exercising speech.
Free Speech exercise by these Arabs / Muslims resulted in arrest/assassination:
Comics A.M. | French teen arrested for posting ‘Charlie Hebdo’ parody
by Brigid Alverson | January 23, 2015
From the apparent cartoon in question
A 16-year-old in Nantes, France, was arrested last week for posting a cartoon on Facebook that mocks the
Charlie Hebdo killings..
The cartoon shows someone holding a copy of
Charlie Hebdo and being struck by bullets. Electronic Intifada posts what is most likely the offending cartoon (it had been shared widely on social media), a takeoff on one of the more notorious
Charlie Hebdo covers, accompanied by the text, “Charlie Hebdo is shit. It doesn’t stop bullets.”
Free Speech exercise by these zionsist Jews resulted in free speech protection:
Publisher of the ‘Atlanta Jewish Times’ suggests Mossad should assassinate Obama
Adam Horowitz on January 20, 2012
John Cook reports
at Gawker:
Andrew Adler, the owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, a weekly newspaper serving Atlanta’s Jewish community, devoted his January 13, 2012 column to the thorny problem of the U.S. and Israel’s diverging views on the threat posed by Iran. Basically Israel has three options, he wrote: Strike Hezbollah and Hamas, strike Iran,
or “order a hit” on Barack Obama. Either way, problem solved!
Here’s how Adler laid out “option three” in his list of scenarios facing Israeli president Benjamin Netanyahu (the column, which was forwarded to us by a tipster, isn’t online, but
you can read a copy here):
Three, give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.
Yes, you read “three” correctly. Order a hit on a president in order to preserve Israel’s existence. Think about it. If I have thought of this Tom Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s most inner circles?
Another way of putting “three” in perspective goes something like this: How far would you go to save a nation comprised of seven million lives…Jews, Christians and Arabs alike?
You have got to believe, like I do, that all options are on the table.
