Turns out Hillary Clinton said Republicans — not Russians — were grooming Tulsi Gabbard

[enhanced_deficit]

Turns out Hillary Clinton said Republicans — not Russians — were grooming Tulsi Gabbard

What a sad end to Tulsi's political career just days after she called MAGA Saudi's 'bit*h' and referred to him as a 'pimp' and soon after she was outed as secret pawn of Deep Zionism.

Madam Hillary Clinton, what have you done.

If 'Russians' was euphemism for 'Right Wing Jewish/Pro-Israel neoconservative donors' of Republicans-MAGA wing, she should say it or clarify if it was a Freudian slip or something else.

Gabbard received an award from Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, a New Jersey-based rabbi with close ties to casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson (the largest donor to the Republican Party). A year before Gabbard attended Boteach’s gala dinner and received his “Champion of Freedom” Award, Boteach published full-page ads in leading U.S. newspapers in which he accused Obama’s national security adviser, Susan Rice, of being responsible for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
In 2015, she spoke at a conference of Christians United for Israel – an organization whose leader and founder, Pastor John Hagee, is a strong supporter of West Bank settlements.


Turns out Hillary Clinton said Republicans — not Russians — were grooming Tulsi Gabbard

Published: Oct 24, 2019
In a curious turn of events, a number of major news organizations ran corrections Wednesday night over week-old reports that sparked a testy war of words between Hillary Clinton and Democratic presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.
Last week, a number of media organizations, including the New York Times, CNN and Politico, ran reports saying Clinton told the podcast “Campaign HQ with David Plouffe” that Russians were “grooming” a female Democratic candidate — widely assumed to be Gabbard — for a third-party run to play a potential spoiler in the 2020 election.
But apparently Clinton meant Republicans — not Russians — were doing the grooming.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/t...ssians-were-grooming-tulsi-gabbard-2019-10-24


MAGA Republican donors Adelsons couple is Israeli-American, so they can't be confused as 'Russians'.
MAGA's talented 'Russian' son-in-law, an ally of Adelsons, is a Republican but there is no indication if that caused Hillary's confusion initially.


Very Likely Un-Related (Pending further explanation from Hon. Hillary Clinton about Tulsi's alleged 'Russian' grooming mixup)

Israel elections: Netanyahu, Lieberman fight for the 'Russian vote'




Semi-Related

[h=1]Vladimir Putin says Trump was impeached for 'made-up reasons'[/h]Putin: Maybe Jews or minorities behind US election interference
By Madison Park, CNN
March 12, 2018
(CNN)Jewish groups are criticizing Russian President Vladimir Putin after he suggested Russian minorities such as Jews or Tatars could be behind alleged meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Lies, Hitlery looked like a crackpot and everyone made fun of her so they are rewriting history.

 

[Swordsmyth]

 

[dannno]

Turns out nobody believes that shit.

 

[Jamesiv1]

Here’s the full quote from the podcast:


Plouffe: “So [Trump’s] gonna try and drive the people not to vote for him but just to say, ‘you know, you can’t vote for them either.’ And that seems to be, I think, to the extent that I can devine a strategy, their key strategy right now.”


Clinton: “Well, I think there’s gonna be two parts and I think it’s gonna be the same as 2016: ‘Don’t vote for the other guy. You don’t like me? Don’t vote for the other guy because the other guy is gonna do X, Y and Z or the other guy did such terrible things and I’m gonna show you in these, you know, flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web, and nobody can find them, but you’re gonna see them and you’re gonna see that person do these horrible things.’


“They’re also gonna do third party again. And I’m not making any predictions but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third party candidate. She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far, and that’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up. Which she might not, ‘cause she’s also a Russian asset.”

 

[Swordsmyth]

Here’s the full quote from the podcast:


Plouffe: “So [Trump’s] gonna try and drive the people not to vote for him but just to say, ‘you know, you can’t vote for them either.’ And that seems to be, I think, to the extent that I can devine a strategy, their key strategy right now.”


Clinton: “Well, I think there’s gonna be two parts and I think it’s gonna be the same as 2016: ‘Don’t vote for the other guy. You don’t like me? Don’t vote for the other guy because the other guy is gonna do X, Y and Z or the other guy did such terrible things and I’m gonna show you in these, you know, flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web, and nobody can find them, but you’re gonna see them and you’re gonna see that person do these horrible things.’


“They’re also gonna do third party again. And I’m not making any predictions but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third party candidate. She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far, and that’s assuming Jill Stein will give it up. Which she might not, ‘cause she’s also a Russian asset.”

They DID try to call Stein a Russian asset last time so that part proves she meant exactly what she said about Gabbard.

 

[Jamesiv1]

If you can stomach The View, here's the audio of Hillary saying it:



I suggest the "grooming" sentence is in fact referring to Republicans. However, the "Jill Stein" sentence clearly calls Tulsi a Russian asset.

 

[FunkBuddha]

If you can stomach The View, here's the audio of Hillary saying it:



I suggest the "grooming" sentence is in fact referring to Republicans. However, the "Jill Stein" sentence clearly calls Tulsi a Russian asset.

Yep. To what else would "also" be referring?

 

[Stratovarious]

She didn't mean to commit Espionage either , she meant to commit Treason.

If I remember correctly , Rush Linbaugh used to say ''words mean things....'' ''if he/she'd have meant to say
something different or used a different word 'they' would have''

 

[Stratovarious]

Hillary;
'' When I said , push the Button on those basterds, go ahead and Nuc The Kremlin, I meant lets
invite them for tea...''

Wouldn't she make a great Pres (if she is really so fkd up that she doesn't know which way is up...)

 

[osan]

Turns out nobody believes that shit.

And yet, media will continue the narrative and as usual the lies become the tacit truth in the minds of the average dimwits.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Nice try Hillary but everybody knows who you were referring to.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Heaven forbid if Hillary's prediction did come true and Tulsi ran as 3rd party in 2020, could Tulsi end up taking away conservative/hard-right votes from MAGA (assuming he wins in any impeachment battles and GOP primary challenges from likes of Sanford, Romney etc).


This is axios citing fb,reddit,gap,4chan etc, so read with some grains of salt.


Sara Fischer
Oct 22, 2019

Tulsi Gabbard is getting a boost from conservatives online

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has received the biggest surge of all 2020 Democratic contenders in social media mentions by percentage increase between Oct. 8 and Oct. 15 according to social intelligence company Storyful.

Why it matters: It's another example of a 2020 Democrat experiencing a boost online thanks in part to fringe voices on the right. Earlier this year, Axios reported on ways far-right voices were helping to elevate Andrew Yang.

• The increase can be attributed to Gabbard's accusations that the Democratic Party had rigged the elections, which gained a lot of attention on the far-right, and her threat to boycott the last debate.

By the numbers: Gabbard went from receiving 162,500 mentions across many social platforms measured by Storyful (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, Gab, 4Chan) in the first week of October to over 338,000 between Oct. 8 and 15.

• Comments by Gabbard condemning members of her own party have garnered her lots of attention from far-right figures, which explains some of the increased attention she is receiving on platforms like Reddit, 4chan and Gab.
• For example, here's an example of a chain started about it on the pro-Trump Reddit Channel "r/DrainTheSwamp."

Between the lines: "We are seeing commentary pushing the idea of a Yang/Gabbard ticket, especially on 4chan," says Storyful senior journalist Catherine Sanz, who pulled the data.

• Gabbard has gained traction among prominent Yang Gang fan pages, per Sanz.
• Caroline Orr, a research analyst and reporter, noted via Twitter yesterday that Tulsi-related hashtags "are getting boosted by YangGang, which is made up of a lot of MAGA fans."

axios.com/tulsi-gabbard-right-wing-conservative-social-media-boost





Related

Developing...
In 2015, Trump did not mean to suggest that Adelsons groomed US politicians

US Presidential "Medal of Freedom" is much more prestigious than Rabbi Shmuley's "Champion of Freedom" award

President Donald Trump on Friday recognized his major donor Miriam Adelson (wife of Sheldon Adelson) by awarding her Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest honor the nation reserves for a civilian.
November 16, 2018

Gabbard received an award from Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, a New Jersey-based rabbi with close ties to casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson (the largest donor to the Republican Party). A year before Gabbard attended Boteach’s gala dinner and received his “Champion of Freedom” Award, Boteach published full-page ads in leading U.S. newspapers in which he accused Obama’s national security adviser, Susan Rice, of being responsible for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
In 2015, she spoke at a conference of Christians United for Israel – an organization whose leader and founder, Pastor John Hagee, is a strong supporter of West Bank settlements.
Adelson is the ultra-Zionist Republican political kingmaker and casino billionaire, who is also Netanyahu's great backer and dominant owner of media in Israel.

 

[Pauls' Revere]

If the rate of new laws grows every year by 10% and only 1% of Americans become Libertarians, you could say that tyranny is winning.


Looks like Americans need to up their game.


Americans don't care about freedom, but things are getting serious. Tyranny just increases constantly.


Couldn't Americans get out of their echo chambers and wake people up?


Who would have thought in 1980 that the USA would soon have nanny state laws, regulations, security cameras, license plate readers, checkpoints, redlight cameras, speed cameras, FBI facial and voice recognition, curfews, gun bans, searches without warrants, mandatory minimums, DNA databases, CISPA, SOPA, IMBRA, private prison quotas, no knock raids, take down notices, no fly lists, terror watch lists, Constitution free zones, stop and frisk, 3 strikes laws, kill switches, National Security Letters, kill lists, FBAR, FATCA, Operation Chokepoint, civil forfeiture, CIA torture, NDAA indefinite detention, secret FISA courts, FEMA camps, laws requiring passports for domestic travel, IRS laws denying passports for tax debts, gun and ammo stockpiles, laws outlawing protesting, police militarization, NSA wiretapping, the end to the right to silence, free speech bans, private prisons, FOSTA, TSA groping, and Jade Helm?


Maybe Americans might be a little safer in Chile when the USA starts WWIII with Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.


https://ideapod.com/top-10-safest-countries-world-war-3-breaks/

+ rep.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

If I remember correctly , Rush Linbaugh used to say ''words mean things....'' ''if he/she'd have meant to say
something different or used a different word 'they' would have''

Hard to disagree with that.
Come to think of it, Obama gave a speech on similar topic also, headline then was something like "just words".

 

[TER]

Heaven forbid if Hillary's prediction did come true and Tulsi ran as 3rd party in 2020, could Tulsi end up taking away conservative/hard-right votes from MAGA (assuming he wins in any impeachment battles and GOP primary challenges from likes of Sanford, Romney etc).

Oh yes, heaven forbid! I’m sure it must be keeping you awake at night that MAGA might be divided because of Tulsi!

You know the problem with lies, deception, and sarcasm is that after a while it betrays the type of person you truly are and your divisive and deceptive agenda.

Tulsi going third party would be the best thing that would happen for Trump to be re-elected. Any logical person would know that.

Hillary is right to be worried about Tulsi. She is one of the greatest threats against the Democrats if she was to go third party. That would ensure Trump winning in a landslide.

 

[Ender]

Oh yes, heaven forbid! I’m sure it must be keeping you awake at night that MAGA might be divided because of Tulsi!

You know the problem with lies, deception, and sarcasm is that after a while it betrays the type of person you truly are and your divisive and deceptive agenda.

Tulsi going third party would be the best thing that would happen for Trump to be re-elected. Any logical person would know that.

Hillary is right to be worried about Tulsi. She is one of the greatest threats against the Democrats if she was to go third party. That would ensure Trump winning in a landslide.

Sarcasm has nothing to do with lies & deception. Sometimes, of late, it's the only way to communicate on the forum w/o losing one's mind.

And I agree totally about Tulsi.

So, stop with the insults, TER- you're better than this.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Sarcasm has nothing to do with lies & deception. Sometimes, of late, it's the only way to communicate on the forum w/o losing one's mind.

And I agree totally about Tulsi.

So, stop with the insults, TER- you're better than this.

TER is right.

 

[TER]

Sarcasm has nothing to do with lies & deception. Sometimes, of late, it's the only way to communicate on the forum w/o losing one's mind.

And I agree totally about Tulsi.

So, stop with the insults, TER- you're better than this.

What I find insulting is being lied to and being mocked day in and day out by a person who feigns to be a concerned American citizen.

Sarcasm is sarcasm when it is obvious to those around in order to make a point. It’s why one often puts /s or an emoticon to make sure it is obvious. What this poster does is not to be obvious but to be deceptive, especially to anyone who isn’t aware of his agenda and tactics. Big difference.

 

[Stratovarious]

Hard to disagree with that.
Come to think of it, Obama gave a speech on similar topic also, headline then was something like "just words".

I almost break out in hives when I hear that name 'Obama' , grrr; Mandate Heath insurance, mandate any product
that Americans must buy , mandatory ....