ItsTime
Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2007
- Messages
- 16,932
TruthInMedia Exclusive: Oath Keepers Reportedly Attacked By Law Enforcement And Rioters
- Thread starter ItsTime
- Start date
Christopher A. Brown
Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,388
Clear sign that a Lawful and Peaceful Revolution is the only solution
The oath keepers have a conditional agenda because they refuse to discuss Article V and they are really not "keeping the oath". They are selectively NOT following orders that violate clauses of the oath.
There is good evidence there is a conspiracy behind the rioting that leads back to Soros. Meaning those that sent the oath keepers in a competing co conspiracy are not a part of Soros's efforts, and not accepted as such by the people in Fergusen.
A lawful and peaceful revolution will undermine both conspiracies and create functional solution to the problem of law enforcement destructive to unalienable rights.
The oath keepers have a conditional agenda because they refuse to discuss Article V and they are really not "keeping the oath". They are selectively NOT following orders that violate clauses of the oath.
There is good evidence there is a conspiracy behind the rioting that leads back to Soros. Meaning those that sent the oath keepers in a competing co conspiracy are not a part of Soros's efforts, and not accepted as such by the people in Fergusen.
A lawful and peaceful revolution will undermine both conspiracies and create functional solution to the problem of law enforcement destructive to unalienable rights.
phill4paul
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 46,967
Origanalist
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,054
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,705
thoughtomator
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 11,267
good lesson here about inserting oneself into intractable, longstanding conflicts that one is not a party to
it's like our Middle East policy in a bottle
it's like our Middle East policy in a bottle
VegasPatriot
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 772
Even though the MSM has been attacking Oath Keepers over the past few days our membership and store sales have gone wild. I have been so busy trying to keep up... it is good to see that so many people are seeing through the BS spewed by so many media outlets.
VP
A Snowball Named Reuters
Tuesday, August 11, 2015, was quite the day for Oath Keepers. On Monday the 10th, four of our members had served as body guards at Ferguson, Missouri, for a news crew from InfoWars dot com. The whole of the Oath Keepers organization did not pile in and clog the streets. Only four Oath Keepers were working that detail, as a favor to journalists who were concerned about their safety.
I say, “only four”, just to denote that the organization did not muster forces for another security detail. The four were acting locally, at the request of InfoWars, and were doing so because there had already been trouble for some journalists in Ferguson. I say, “only four”, but that is not to understate the highly professional work our four Oath Keepers did there. Oath Keepers national is proud of the quiet professionalism, cool-headed methodology, and expert deportment of those four Missouri Oath Keepers.
Led by Sam Andrews, these brave men carried out their mission, and the journalists they were guarding were kept safe in the midst of yet another Ferguson, Missouri, riot. At the core of Sam’s and his pals’ mission were journalists, so let’s talk a bit about journalism in America. I would like to share something from the U.S. Congressional Record of February 9, 1917, page 2947. One may search for this quite easily and bring up many results, but I like the simplicity of how the good folks over at Mindfully.org posted it.
Follow this link to read the full article: http://oathkeepers.org/oktester/a-snowball-named-reuters/
VP
A Snowball Named Reuters
Tuesday, August 11, 2015, was quite the day for Oath Keepers. On Monday the 10th, four of our members had served as body guards at Ferguson, Missouri, for a news crew from InfoWars dot com. The whole of the Oath Keepers organization did not pile in and clog the streets. Only four Oath Keepers were working that detail, as a favor to journalists who were concerned about their safety.
I say, “only four”, just to denote that the organization did not muster forces for another security detail. The four were acting locally, at the request of InfoWars, and were doing so because there had already been trouble for some journalists in Ferguson. I say, “only four”, but that is not to understate the highly professional work our four Oath Keepers did there. Oath Keepers national is proud of the quiet professionalism, cool-headed methodology, and expert deportment of those four Missouri Oath Keepers.
Led by Sam Andrews, these brave men carried out their mission, and the journalists they were guarding were kept safe in the midst of yet another Ferguson, Missouri, riot. At the core of Sam’s and his pals’ mission were journalists, so let’s talk a bit about journalism in America. I would like to share something from the U.S. Congressional Record of February 9, 1917, page 2947. One may search for this quite easily and bring up many results, but I like the simplicity of how the good folks over at Mindfully.org posted it.
Follow this link to read the full article: http://oathkeepers.org/oktester/a-snowball-named-reuters/
Slave Mentality
Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 2,066
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,705
I have not forgotten your offer, I still am going to send in for the full membership.
VegasPatriot
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 772
+ rep
For those that don't know I helped Stewart start Oath Keepers... my membership number is 3; I've worn many different hats for this organization including producing videos, financing OK's start up, membership coordinator and I am currently OK's store manager as well as on the BOD. So for those here that want to support OK and purchase something from our store it would be greatly appreciated... if you place a note in the comment section when placing your order (something like RPF member) I will make sure to put a few extra goodies in your package (like a few bumper stickers and a pocket constitution).
http://www.oathkeepersgear.net/
Dr.3D
Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2007
- Messages
- 30,314
He seems to be a one trick pony.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,705
VegasPatriot
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 772
Jon Schaffer Rocks Oathkeeper Gear. Lifetime member I see
+ rep
I just did a search and found this video interview: https://youtu.be/oyaN77mqkD4
AF... I just cleaned up my mailbox...
Christopher A. Brown
Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,388
Although modern cognitive infiltration does employ semiotics, it is not the same as the basics which Bernays developed.
what sunstein defines and what is the CGHQ training program, exposed by Snowden at the intercept;
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
uses false social groups where the shear force of numbers and a covert shared agenda makes a social front that misleads then deceives the observer on the web forum.
Bernays used media in very large campaigns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
An Example:
"Bernays refined and popularized the use of the press release, following its invention by PR man Ivy Lee, who had issued a press release after the 1906 Atlantic City train wreck. One of the most famous campaigns of Bernays was the women's cigarette smoking campaign in 1920s. Bernays helped the smoking industry overcome one of the biggest social taboos of the time: women smoking in public. Women were only allowed to smoke in designated areas, or not at all. Women caught violating this rule were arrested."
Bernays belongs at the bottom of the pyramid, cognitive infiltration of the first kind. Social conditioning.
Firstly, avoid the trap that could prevent critical thinking. Cognitive distortions.
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS
A) All or nothing thinking- Things are placed in black or white categories.(*) If things are less than perfect self is viewed as failure.
B) Over generalization- Single event is viewed as continuous failure.
C) Mental filter- Details in life (positive or negative) are amplified in importance while opposite is rejected.
D) Minimizing- Perceiving one or opposite experiences (positive or negative) as absolute and maintaining singularity of belief to one or the other.
F) Mind reading- One absolutely concludes that others are reacting positively or negatively without investigating reality.
G) Fortune Telling- Based on previous 5 distortions, anticipation of negative or positive outcome of situations is established
H) Catastrophizing- Exaggerated importance of self's failures and others successes.
I) Emotional reasoning- One feels as though emotional state IS reality of situation.
J) "Should" statements- Self imposed rules about behavior creating guilt at self inability to adhere and anger at others in their inability to conform to self's rules.
K) Labeling:- Instead of understanding errors over generalization is applied.
L) Personalization- Thinking that the actions or statements of others are a reaction to you.
M) Entitlement- Believing that you deserve things you have not earned.
Your signature employs K) labeling and A), "all or nothing thinking". "It's all a sham. All of it." The tendency is to create a mental filter C) Its true however, but it is far better to actually create an understanding.
For example: "Wetiko"
Native American philosopher Jack Forbes explains that the overriding characteristic of a wétiko, a Cree word literally meaning “cannibal,” is “that he consumes other human beings for profit, that is, he is a cannibal”
So yes, but the tools that cognitive infiltrators are, do not really represent that in the same way the word is intended. The true "Wetiko" represent the sociopaths of executive corporatism that design things for profit without regard for their impact on humanity. "Wetiko" is not cognitive infiltration, it is a goal, and agenda and it may be completely unconscious. The reason for that is holding such a goal consciously may be too dark and destructive to human life for the individual to interact normally thusly impair their efforts.
Another consciously held motive acts as a cover in that case. The person thinks "this', or "that" is their motive rather than the elements of "Wetiko".
what sunstein defines and what is the CGHQ training program, exposed by Snowden at the intercept;
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/
uses false social groups where the shear force of numbers and a covert shared agenda makes a social front that misleads then deceives the observer on the web forum.
Bernays used media in very large campaigns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
An Example:
"Bernays refined and popularized the use of the press release, following its invention by PR man Ivy Lee, who had issued a press release after the 1906 Atlantic City train wreck. One of the most famous campaigns of Bernays was the women's cigarette smoking campaign in 1920s. Bernays helped the smoking industry overcome one of the biggest social taboos of the time: women smoking in public. Women were only allowed to smoke in designated areas, or not at all. Women caught violating this rule were arrested."
Bernays belongs at the bottom of the pyramid, cognitive infiltration of the first kind. Social conditioning.
Firstly, avoid the trap that could prevent critical thinking. Cognitive distortions.
COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS
A) All or nothing thinking- Things are placed in black or white categories.(*) If things are less than perfect self is viewed as failure.
B) Over generalization- Single event is viewed as continuous failure.
C) Mental filter- Details in life (positive or negative) are amplified in importance while opposite is rejected.
D) Minimizing- Perceiving one or opposite experiences (positive or negative) as absolute and maintaining singularity of belief to one or the other.
F) Mind reading- One absolutely concludes that others are reacting positively or negatively without investigating reality.
G) Fortune Telling- Based on previous 5 distortions, anticipation of negative or positive outcome of situations is established
H) Catastrophizing- Exaggerated importance of self's failures and others successes.
I) Emotional reasoning- One feels as though emotional state IS reality of situation.
J) "Should" statements- Self imposed rules about behavior creating guilt at self inability to adhere and anger at others in their inability to conform to self's rules.
K) Labeling:- Instead of understanding errors over generalization is applied.
L) Personalization- Thinking that the actions or statements of others are a reaction to you.
M) Entitlement- Believing that you deserve things you have not earned.
Your signature employs K) labeling and A), "all or nothing thinking". "It's all a sham. All of it." The tendency is to create a mental filter C) Its true however, but it is far better to actually create an understanding.
For example: "Wetiko"
Native American philosopher Jack Forbes explains that the overriding characteristic of a wétiko, a Cree word literally meaning “cannibal,” is “that he consumes other human beings for profit, that is, he is a cannibal”
So yes, but the tools that cognitive infiltrators are, do not really represent that in the same way the word is intended. The true "Wetiko" represent the sociopaths of executive corporatism that design things for profit without regard for their impact on humanity. "Wetiko" is not cognitive infiltration, it is a goal, and agenda and it may be completely unconscious. The reason for that is holding such a goal consciously may be too dark and destructive to human life for the individual to interact normally thusly impair their efforts.
Another consciously held motive acts as a cover in that case. The person thinks "this', or "that" is their motive rather than the elements of "Wetiko".
Last edited:
Christopher A. Brown
Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2011
- Messages
- 1,388
Unaccountability appears to be the only mode of interaction. Here is some rep that should be a comment in a thread where I can reply. So I've taken a screen shot of the rep and am posting it.
Uh, I've asked dozens of times for a description, plan, strategy for an agenda to "take back our country", and NO ONE has ever produced a coherent plan, let alone one that has legal veracity.
Ironically, the plan I present is coherent and it has legal veracity. The very first thing it needs is citizen agreement upon prime constitutional intents.
Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?
Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?
Apparently there is something too functional about this idea, and people prefer whining and complaining, because it will actually cause no change.
Uh, I've asked dozens of times for a description, plan, strategy for an agenda to "take back our country", and NO ONE has ever produced a coherent plan, let alone one that has legal veracity.
Ironically, the plan I present is coherent and it has legal veracity. The very first thing it needs is citizen agreement upon prime constitutional intents.
Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?
Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish?
Apparently there is something too functional about this idea, and people prefer whining and complaining, because it will actually cause no change.
Similar threads
