Trump Would Fund Super-PACs Aimed at Taking Down Cruz, Kasich

Yea brah, dogma's for cucks.

You and me get it. What those lame dogmatististists don't see is, we enlightened Trump voters are above dogma, and facts, and logic.

Sure, Trump's against everything we stand for, and he's not actually advancing libertarianism in any way, but he's like, totally, you know, haha...



I think that was collectivistic thinking?
 
Nobody claimed that he was advancing libertarianism.

So you acknowledge that he isn't advancing libertarianism.

Good, thank you, honesty from a Trumpkin is a refreshing change.

Is the liberty movement about libertarianism, or liberty?

Is that a riddle of some kind?

...what distinction are you attempting to draw between libertarianism and liberty?
 
And in your case CPUd, I would venture a guess that your motivation has nothing to do with principles, but this:

90f891c19873da151b2733055b54227d.jpg

Wrong again, as always.
 
Uh huh...

What do you think libertarianism is exactly?
Since you asked. In a nutshell..

200.gif


Border-ART-45aswqm.gif


Disarm-NYPD-Burn-American-Flag-Event-620x413.jpg


Oh, and no image for this one, but there seems to be a subset who advocate for the right to have sex with underage children.

And dream of:

never-never-land.jpg


While unknowingly(?) helping:
communism_by_stevanov.jpg


In summary...
20140815174132
 
Last edited:
But that is just a Japanese citizen that is disgruntled and is work place violence o_o. I read he used to work there. There is not a large scale organization of terror cells or groups going after the same goal. Regardless, its still a low crime country. I guarantee if you import people from certain countries or without controls... crime will go up.

Not sure how that event is comparable to what is happening in Europe. Europe importing people that has a higher affinity to become radicalized and commit acts of large scale murder or crime ;s. But of course.. it seems a lot of people blame the Europeans for not being understanding or something. haha

Well, looks like in trying to discern what causes the differences for their lower rate they are settling on:

The UNODC cited a number of theories for why homicides occurred so rarely in Japan, including the fact that 98 percent of homicide cases are solved, the growth of affluence and a general rejection of violence after World War II — even the country's organized criminals, the yakuza, are said to avoid violent confrontations, coming up with unusual techniques such as standing outside a business swinging a cat by its tail to extort money.

Of particular interest to American readers might be the scarcity of guns in Japan. The country has strict requirements for owning a gun and harsh punishments for those who break the rules. As a consequence, there are few guns in the country; Japan has 0.6 guns per 100 civilians compared with 101 guns per 100 civilians in the United States, and even firearm enthusiasts seem comfortable with that. Japan had a single shooting death in 2015, compared with more than 13,000 in the United States. According to one count, 475 people were killed in mass shootings alone in the United States last year.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...y-mass-violence-is-so-rare-in-japan/#comments

Their culture and history are unique and to replicate such would likely not be something most Westerners would find appealing. They do have a high suicide rate.

The numbers are glaring. Japan’s overall suicide rate is roughly 60 percent higher than the global average, a 2014 World Health Organization report noted. In 2014 alone, 25,000 Japanese people took their own lives—roughly 70 suicides every day.

Last year, suicide was the leading cause of death for Japanese children between the ages of 10 and 19. Among teens and young adults ages 10–24, there are roughly 4,600 suicide deaths in each year, and another 157,000 instances of hospitalization for self-inflicted injuries.
http://www.newsweek.com/why-do-so-many-japanese-schoolchildren-kill-themselves-391648

As for importing a huge number of people and them bringing their violence and crime, Native Americans could tell the horror stories of the mass immigration of entitled Europeans bringing their violence and crime to the shores of North and South America. ;)
 
Gary Johnson, p.144 , Aug 1, 2012

That's a nice sentiment. But it's more of a present-tense thing. He says he's against it now. He claimed opposition 11 years later. Great. Nice talky-talk. I'm interested on whether he actually opposed it when it counted.

I want to know what Gary Johnson did to oppose the PATRIOT Act in 2001 when it was being debated and passed. Either he opposed it or he didn't. From what I can tell, he didn't.

I'd love to be proven wrong. Show me a letter that the Governor sent to the New Mexico delgation to Congress asking them to oppose the PATRIOT Act in 2001. Get me an mp3 or transcript of a talk radio interview he did in in 2001 telling people to call Congress to oppose the PATRIOT Act.

That would be great! I would love that. Hard evidence that he opposed the passage of the PATRIOT Act!

Can you do that? Thanks in advance.
 
Back
Top