Trump Wants Revenge — That’s Why He’s the Man for 2024

So, because he wants revenge Trump is automatically the right guy to lead us all to liberty? THIS peurile bullshit is the current level of political strategy and discourse in this country? A few more years of this blowhard in the spotlight and otherwise intelligent people will be beating their chests, grunting and flinging feces at each other.

And some people actually believe that Trump has advanced the cause of liberty in some way?

SMGDH
 
So, because he wants revenge Trump is automatically the right guy to lead us all to liberty? THIS peurile bull$#@! is the current level of political strategy and discourse in this country? A few more years of this blowhard in the spotlight and otherwise intelligent people will be beating their chests, grunting and flinging feces at each other.

And some people actually believe that Trump has advanced the cause of liberty in some way?

SMGDH
Only the destruction of our enemies will advance liberty.
Trump has already done much to destroy our enemies and advance liberty, more than any of the losers or small fry some people around here claim we should waste our time on ever will.
Go ahead and start building a brand for someone to equal or exceed Trump's, but get out of Trump's way until it's done.
 
...some people only keep little lists of things they don't like.

Or little lists of people they were fond of who died shortly after taking the jab he authorized and financed.

I love watching you people downplay things like simultaneously destroying the dollar and setting hundreds of thousands up to die by being the Vax King, while painting mere, harmless voters as loading the whole country on a pickup truck and driving it to China for not putting a Trump sign in their yard.

Strengthen enemies or destroy?

Hard to tell

Put on a blindfold and put Breitbart on auto play, and you too will not only be free of confusion, you can be arrogant. You'll be wrong, which will make you an arrogant ass. But you will be free of confusion.

Except when you're trying to figure out which excuse to use for his actions. But don't worry. Just accuse people of being nitpickers and libel them with innuendo, and act like the lack of popularity of libertian candidates is their failing, not the MSM's gift of unprecedented free publicity to Trump.
 
Last edited:
Strengthen enemies or destroy?

Hard to tell

Depends. Do you take the historical view that governments accumulate power as quickly as the populace will tolerate? In that case, Trump is strengthening the enemies of liberty.

Or, do you take the millenarian view that by pushing our enemies beyond what the populace will tolerate that there will be a cataclysm, after which the populace will return to the principles of liberty? So, if you're hoping to expedite the fall, then maybe he is destroying our enemies. (although, in this case, the historical view should also give you reason to caution, because typically after a fall, those who step in are usually no better and often times worse. The American Revolution being a rare exception.)
 
Congress was responsible for the spending, tariffs increase the power of the average working man and therefore increase liberty.
Trump did many other things to increase liberty but some people only keep little lists of things they don't like.

Yeah, little things like doubling the size of government. Doubling the monetary base.
 
Yeah, little things like doubling the size of government.

The size or the spending? Say what you mean; you're talking to someone who knows he doesn't have a leg to stand on, but isn't too proud to nitpick you to death.

You know Pfizer has basically been made a branch of the federal government and I know it. But plausible deniability is still in effect.

Doubling the monetary base.

Guess you haven't heard. When Republicans do it, it doesn't cause inflation.

See, you thought the value of a currency didn't degrade until the freshly printed addition gained enough velocity to affect supply vs. demand. But in reality, inflation doesn't start until felicity goes down, meaning there's no longer a guy with an R next to his name in the White House who needs our help covering his ass.
 
Last edited:
Or little lists of people they were fond of who died shortly after taking the jab he authorized and financed.

I love watching you people downplay things like simultaneously destroying the dollar and setting hundreds of thousands up to die by being the Vax King, while painting mere, harmless voters as loading the whole country on a pickup truck and driving it to China for not putting a Trump sign in their yard.
Those bad things would have happened as bad or worse if he had opposed them, and he would have been destroyed and prevented from doing the good things.
It would be like blaming Ron for the spending because he put earmarks in the bills.
 
Those bad things would have happened as bad or worse if he had opposed them, and he would have been destroyed and prevented from doing the good things.
It would be like blaming Ron for the spending because he put earmarks in the bills.

That's a little too on the nose. "Well," she said with a sad sigh "I'm just glad he was vaccinated, otherwise his death would've been worse." "Still," she thought, "Myocarditis is one hell of a way to go."

Your boss fast tracked himself to the contempt of all thinking people.

Those are not remotely similar: Donald Trump helped (1)finance (2) "fast track" the agent that was then applied to people after a massive campaign of coercion (of varying degrees). Ron Paul merely secured monies that were sent to Washington by his constituents in the first place. One involved using other people's resources to facilitate a crime, the other sought to return resources to those from whom they were taken in the first place.

Donald Trump is to Ron Paul what Polonium is to the Sun. Both radiate, but what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
The size or the spending? Say what you mean; you're talking to someone who knows he doesn't have a leg to stand on, but isn't too proud to nitpick you to death.

You know Pfizer has basically been made a branch of the federal government and I know it. But plausible deniability is still in effect.



Guess you haven't heard. When Republicans do it, it doesn't cause inflation.

See, you thought the value of a currency didn't degrade until the freshly printed addition gained enough velocity to affect supply vs. demand. But in reality, inflation doesn't start until felicity goes down, meaning there's no longer a guy with an R next to his name in the White House who needs our help covering his ass.

Directly after Trump's loss SS was notable absent from this place. Almost like a new message was being tailored. Low and behold, here it is!

Sword, are you here alone?
 
Directly after Trump's loss SS was notable absent from this place. Almost like a new message was being tailored. Low and behold, here it is!

Sword, are you here alone?
LOL

Mr. 86 posts since Dec 2021 is going to comment on my posting frequency.

LOL
 
LOL

Mr. 86 posts since Dec 2021 is going to comment on my posting frequency.

LOL

Oh, look. Kamala's cackling again.

So, you treat this place the way sanitation engineers treat the dump. You don't make it smell any better, but at least you don't ignore it.

Your "selling points" aren't very effective. Some of us see more to like in 86 quality posts than in 66,000 "I'm sleepier than sleepy Joe :sleeping:" and "I cackle more than Kamala LOL" slices of spam.

Weren't interest rates near zero since before or after the "housing bubble?" Shouldn't inflation have kicked in way before now? Snowball/avalanche?

Inflation didn't kick in way before now? Gee, I could have sworn my dad kept saying he needed to teach me the value of a dollar during the stagflation of the seventies, but could hardly wrap his mind around how fast it was losing value.
 
Last edited:
Oh, look. Kamala's cackling again.

So, you treat this place the way sanitation engineers treat the dump. You don't make it smell any better, but at least you don't ignore it.

Your "selling points" aren't very effective.



Inflation didn't kick in way before now? Gee, I could have sworn my dad kept saying he needed to teach me the value of a dollar during the stagflation of the seventies, but could hardly wrap his mind around how fast it was losing value.
For years people promoted gold and precious metals saying that inflation and even hyperinflation were going to cripple us. Ron Paul has been saying the economy couldn't keep going since forever. Shutting down the country for more than a year while spending all that money to keep the economy going had its price. Had there been no plandemic would inflation be as bad as it is? Would government spending had risen as much as it did? Was Trump supposed to ignore the plandemic or say it was a hoax? Do you have any idea what the financial ramifications of the plandemic were?
 
Do you have any idea what the financial ramifications of the plandemic were?

Sure--small business, always the engine driving the U.S. economy, was deliberately destroyed, and Covid was the excuse.

But nobody but the counterfeiters, particularly the official ones, can make the currency supply so much bigger than the demand.

Trump did what he was "supposed" to do. That's why we keep getting all these "3D chess" excuses. It doesn't take brains, integrity, compassion, courage or Big Alpha Orange Cojones to do what you're "supposed" to do.
 
Last edited:
Sure--small business, always the engine driving the U.S. economy, was deliberately destroyed, and Covid was the excuse.

But nobody but the counterfeiters, particularly the official ones, can make the currency supply so much bigger than the demand.

Trump did what he was "supposed" to do. That's why we keep getting all these "3D chess" excuses. It doesn't take brains, integrity, compassion, courage or Big Alpha Orange Cojones to do what you're "supposed" to do.
It is easy for people to say Trump spent $xyz during his presidency. I am asking if you or anyone knows the dollar amount attributed to the plandemic?
 
It is easy for people to say Trump spent $xyz during his presidency. I am asking if you or anyone knows the dollar amount attributed to the plandemic?

"Attributed to"? As in allotted to? Or what it cost real people in terms of real wealth?

You can't really say how much wealth was destroyed by the operation. Not so much was. Mostly wealth wound up in the hands of the already wealthy.
 
"Attributed to"? As in allotted to? Or what it cost real people in terms of real wealth?

You can't really say how much wealth was destroyed by the operation. Not so much was. Mostly wealth wound up in the hands of the already wealthy.
It doesn't matter. Some people know everything until they have to be the decision maker.

Do you think Ron Paul if he were president would have not spent any resources on COVID? Would he have ignored all the advisors and experts at the time? It is much easier to answer game show questions when in the living room than when on the show. It is much easier to criticize what a person that formulates a concept and sees it thru than to formulate the concept. People create something and everybody can say, "oh but you should have done this or that." What the fuch are you doing on your keyboard if you are so politically astute? Go fuching do something.
 
Back
Top