Trump vows law and order crackdown to combat 'menace' of crime

[juleswin]

Yes, but you either forget, choose to ignore, or are unaware that the deep state has a massive fissure in response to the Clinton Foundation pay for play appointees. You aren't telling me things I don't know here.

I am completely unaware of this. From my vantage point, the deep state emptied its swap for a short moment but refilled with a new more energetic swap creatures. They skipped a heart beat but it is not a reason for concern. Well if you believe the powers that be are in a state of panic, then I am telling you something you don't already know.

 

[Athan]

I am completely unaware of this. From my vantage point, the deep state emptied its swap for a short moment but refilled with a new more energetic swap creatures. They skipped a heart beat but it is not a reason for concern. Well if you believe the powers that be are in a state of panic, then I am telling you something you don't already know.

They may not be in a "state of panic", as that is an old description for October. They are right now actively trying to influence, and impede appointments. From your vantage point? How did this vantage point explain the Podesta emails, Weiner's Laptop content, FBI vs Comey spat, firing the DA, JSOC vs. CIA, and CIA management being rebuffed among a host of other events we saw and we are still seeing?

 

[CPUd]

 

[juleswin]

They may not be in a "state of panic", as that is an old description for October. They are right now actively trying to influence, and impede appointments. From your vantage point? How did this vantage point explain the Podesta emails, Weiner's Laptop content, FBI vs Comey spat, firing the DA, JSOC vs. CIA, and CIA management being rebuffed among a host of other events we saw and we are still seeing?

I honestly think this is their way of closing down the Clinton side of the infrastructure and building up the Trump side. They are spending capital to build something they want and with all the neocon and ex govt sacs employees already confirmed, I would say the deep state have been very successful under the Trump admin.

 

[Athan]

I am not referring to that event. He was likely trying to get between the CIA agents and heads John Brennan, General Hayden, Leon Panetta, and James Woolsey. I am talking about CLINTON FOUNDATION APPOINTED officials. There is a reason he selected Michael Flynn as National Security Advisor.

 

[Athan]

I honestly think this is their way of closing down the Clinton side of the infrastructure and building up the Trump side. They are spending capital to build something they want and with all the neocon and ex govt sacs employees already confirmed, I would say the deep state have been very successful under the Trump admin.

You didn't answer my question. What vantage point do you have that gives you insight as to the recent events up to the last year?

 

[CPUd]

I am not referring to that event. He was likely trying to get between the CIA agents and heads John Brennan, John Brennan. I am talking about CLINTON FOUNDATION APPOINTED officials. There is a reason he selected Michael Flynn.

He picked Flynn because Erik Prince wants regime change in Iran and told him to.

 

[juleswin]

You didn't answer my question. What vantage point do you have that gives you insight as to the recent events up to the last year?

Stuff I read and hear from trusted sources on the internet is what gives me my point of view.

 

[Athan]

He picked Flynn because Erik Prince wants regime change in Iran and told him to.

Possible, but JSOG has been hating on CIA power. The CIA was losing control of its drone program. Flynn is deeply aware of CIA abuse of Special Forces in their operations.

 

[Athan]

Stuff I read and hear from trusted sources on the internet is what gives me my point of view.

Quaint. It also doesn't explain the events of last year since Bengahzi and Wikileaks up till now. But for clarification, what sources?

Going to lunch, I'll check back here later.

 

[juleswin]

Quaint. It also doesn't explain the events of last year since Bengahzi and Wikileaks up till now. But for clarification, what sources?

Stefan Molyneux, Alex Jones, Tom Woods, my mistake. Places like boiling frog post, James Corbertt, Ron Paul liberty report, etc etc. Boiling from post is one of the most underrated alt media outlet. I don't like all their reporter but the majority are pretty good.

 

[euphemia]

Crime may be at lower levels in certain places, but it is worse in other places, and the kinds of crimes committed are certainly growing worse. Some of it may be due to the way crimes are reported, but I think we have normalized a lot of really deviant behavior so crime has lost its shock value.

 

[pcosmar]

Crime may be at lower levels in certain places, but it is worse in other places, and the kinds of crimes committed are certainly growing worse. Some of it may be due to the way crimes are reported, but I think we have normalized a lot of really deviant behavior so crime has lost its shock value.

Really,,

It very seldom happens where I am. not that I would allow it

unless you want to count the states crimes against me,,

and I don't believe those are included in statistics.

 

[Athan]

Boiling from post is one of the most underrated alt media outlet. I don't like all their reporter but the majority are pretty good.

You might want to send an email to this "underrated" alt media outlet to get off their ass and start digging into Podesta emails released by Wikileaks. They are leaving their readers horribly uninformed and foolishly out trying to pretentiously lecture people who are observing clearly visible, and serious antagonism between media, Trump's and his advisers, deep state agents and NGO's, GOP, Democrats, former appointees, and have more context what is going on than they do.

I mean this isn't as obscure as our squabble with neocons within the republican party apparatus. This scheisse is pretty obvious. Even hollywood whores, media are calling for assassination on President Trump. How you think "nah man they are all bros now" is beyond my comprehension.

 

[MallsRGood]

Crime may be at lower levels in certain places, but it is worse in other places

That has been true every year, in every place, for all of human history.

That's why we use averages.

 

[FSP-Rebel]

I mean this isn't as obscure as our squabble with neocons within the republican party apparatus. This scheisse is pretty obvious. Even hollywood whores, media are calling for assassination on President Trump. How you think "nah man they are all bros now" is beyond my comprehension.

Not only that but now it's a common tactic of this new left to say it's justified in rioting, assaulting and pillaging its perceived fascist enemies of the new right when in reality it is the left that is unhinged, intolerant and downright violent in their public discourse - thus becoming the very fascists they claim to be fighting against. These little bastards doing the rioting and their leader/academic/media mouthpieces are only going to be put up with for so long until Trump turns up the heat. It's increasingly obvious that these types can't be reasoned with in any shape or form and they have no shortage of Soros funds to continue being public parasites and miscreants.

 

[devil21]

and while that is true,, it is counter to your posting history.
a history of posting in favor of this very Governmental Authority.

are you getting confused,, or replaced again?

This is a good point. A libertarian should usually raise an eyebrow and take a step back if he finds himself agreeing with a Zippy post. Odds are that the post, particularly if a thread starter, is an agenda-furthering post of some sort. Analyze how that post can further central powers in the context of future events, not necessarily current affairs.

 

[TheCount]

Crime may be at lower levels in certain places, but it is worse in other places

It's almost as if local legislation would be more effective at solving a problem that varies from place to place. Has anyone ever had this idea before?

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

It's almost as if local legislation would be more effective at solving a problem that varies from place to place. Has anyone ever had this idea before?

Yes, but local government rule and state rule is almost always nixed by federal rule. The kind of federal rule that you support.