Trump to announce US embassy will move from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem on Monday

Trump backing down on another issue.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/notes-caution-surround-u-embassy-move-jerusalem-155114656.html

Trump White House lowers expectations for quick embassy move in Israel

JERUSALEM/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - During the presidential campaign, Donald Trump's team spoke often about moving the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. But since taking office, the contentious issue has become more nuanced and may already be moving to the backburner.

In a statement issued before a first post-inauguration phone call between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday and later reinforced at a White House news briefing, Trump's press secretary, Sean Spicer, lowered expectations of an imminent announcement of a move that could anger the Arab world.

"We are at the very beginning stages of even discussing this subject," Spicer wrote in an email on Sunday. "There's no decisions," he then told reporters on Monday.

Some Israeli news outlets and Israeli pro-settlement groups have taken it as a positive sign, interpreting the words of the new Trump White House as an indication that talks have begun on a move they long for, even if it could have profound repercussions for regional stability.

But Israeli officials said the issue was barely discussed on the 30-minute call, and diplomats said their understanding was that it was being pushed down the agenda, at least for now.

"Sounds more like walking it backwards," one Israeli official said in a text message after Spicer's statement.

Another said that during the call Netanyahu had not sought a commitment from Trump on the relocation or a timeframe for it.

The former spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry suggested Spicer's line was age-old diplomatic code for "not now". "This really means: 'Don't call us, we'll call you'" Yigal Palmor said on Twitter.

Netanyahu's spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.

NO EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM

While the Israeli prime minister cannot be seen to oppose the United States moving its embassy to Jerusalem - Israel considers the city its eternal and indivisible capital and wants all countries to base their embassies there - there is an awareness that such a move could be destabilizing.

Currently, no country has its embassy in Jerusalem, the Israeli foreign ministry said. Costa Rica and El Salvador did until a few years ago, but they are now in Tel Aviv.
 
Excerpt from: http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2016/september/19/why-are-we-sending-38-billion-to-rich-and-powerful-israel/

Why Are We Sending $38 Billion to Rich and Powerful Israel?
written by ron paul

Last week’s announcement of a record-breaking US aid package for Israel underscores how dangerously foolish and out-of-touch is our interventionist foreign policy. Over the next ten years, the US taxpayer will be forced to give Israel some $38 billion dollars in military aid. It is money we cannot afford going to a country that needs no assistance to maintain its status as the most powerful military in the Middle East.

All US foreign aid is immoral and counterproductive. As I have often said, it is money taken from poor people in the US and sent to rich people overseas. That is because US assistance money goes to foreign governments to hand out as they see fit. Often that assistance is stolen outright or it goes to the politically connected in the recipient country.

Just as bad is the fact that much of what we call “foreign aid” is actually welfare for the wealthy here at home. The aid package to Israel is a very good example. According to the agreement, this $38 billion will all go to US weapons manufacturers. So the real beneficiaries are not the American people, and not even Israeli citizens. The real beneficiaries are the US military-industrial complex. Perhaps the money won’t even leave Washington – it may simply go across town, from the Fed to the Beltway bomb-makers.
 
Last edited:
does that 38 billion include the extra billion a year Israel gets as part of the Iran deal?
 

Was suggesting that it is doubtful that embassy will move in coming few years... or ever.
Once new US ambassdor to Israel, Kushner etc find out that the showboating Act that called for US embassy move was passed before 9/11, they would put this move plan on back burner again.



I dunno what this means ultimately - The Holy City has not really been a target for anybody before.
Isn't Tel Aviv really the front lines ?

EM
Actually it has been targetted few times in the past.

Jerusalem captured in First Crusade - Jul 14, 1099 - HISTORY.com
www.history.com/this-day-in-history/jerusalem-captured-in-first-crusade
In 1095, Pope Urban II publicly called for a crusade to aid Eastern Christians and recover the holy lands. The response by Western Europeans was immediate. During the First Crusade, Christian knights from Europe capture Jerusalem after seven weeks of siege and begin massacring the city's Muslim and Jewish population.



Un-related

Christians are back!

Why Christians Are Fleeing the Holy Lands









Edit to add:
Latest news suggest there is no hurry

White House Pushes Back on Quick Israeli Embassy Move
Newsweek-3 hours ago

Palestinians threaten consequences if US embassy moves to ...
International-Ynetnews-14 hours ago
 
Last edited:
Anytime soon...
Okay.
Any real reasons for moving it in the first place? Is their lease up or something? Does the DSL suck? Crazy common area fees? Trying to help God with something?
Serious question, I may have completely missed the answer. I didn't know about La Macerana until two+ years later -it happens.

 
does that 38 billion include the extra billion a year Israel gets as part of the Iran deal?

Probably not. That money goes into the "Steal, I Mean 'Settle' More Land While Our Lobbyists Force the US to Look the Other Way Fund *wink wink*"
 
Back
Top