Trump threatens to withhold endorsement for Republicans who oppose his rescissions package

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
President Donald Trump on Thursday threatened to withhold his endorsement for any Republican who votes against his multi-billion dollar rescissions package, which includes cuts to federal spending for public broadcasting and foreign aid.


The package includes $1.1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, as the White House has said that NPR and PBS have "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news,'" and $8.3 billion for the United States Agency for International Development, as well as other international assistance programs.


Trump warned Republicans in the Senate not to oppose the legislation, claiming that public broadcasting was even worse than left-leaning news outlets like CNN and MSNBC.


"It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together," he said in a post on Truth Social. "Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"

More at:
Code:
https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/trump-threatens-withhold-endorsement-republicans-who-oppose-his-rescissions

 
President Donald Trump on Thursday threatened to withhold his endorsement for any Republican who votes against his multi-billion dollar rescissions package, which includes cuts to federal spending for public broadcasting and foreign aid.

Just like he does to those who refuse to vote for the pork in the first place.

When is he going to go harass some Democrats?
 
The government does not need money to operate because it controls all resources and enforces regulations. Money and taxes constrain citizens, not the government. Debt and spending limits are meaningless for a sovereign government that issues its own currency. Ultimately, the government’s power comes from resource control and authority, while money is simply a tool that citizens rely on to access those resources.
 
I personally would like it if pres got out of endorsement business all togeter. Ya , senate totally sucks and wont vote for cuts , we already know it. Reliably bad. Rand is only reliable vote. Trump endorsements going forward may be as problematic as beneficial in swing areas. Trump is not future of GOP, Vance may not be as well just by assaociation. Going to need someone seen as more frugal.
 
Last edited:
Just like he does to those who refuse to vote for the pork in the first place.

When is he going to go harass some Democrats?
Harassing Democrats would help them with their voters.

And the people who opposed the bill were holding up important necessities that needed to pass, they also made it easier for the RINOs to make the bill worse and extract things they wanted in return for their votes because people like Rand would not give their votes.
No bill was going to pass the Senate that Rand would like, so the necessities like border security and deportations either wouldn't get funded or they would.

Trump is now pushing through the recissions and losers are complaining that he's threatening the RINOs.
 
No bill was going to pass the Senate that Rand would like, so the necessities like border security and deportations either wouldn't get funded or they would.

The fact that both parties would agree to "border security" should tell you something; such as follow the money.

Your disregard for the BoR's and support of the Globalist technocratic "security" apparatus tells me something too.
 
they also made it easier for the RINOs to make the bill worse

But Trump isn't harassing and threatening the RINOs.

You don't seem to get it. That's because Trump is a RINO. Everyone has finally figured that out but you.

donald-trump-art-of-the-rug-pull.jpg
 
Last edited:
The fact that both parties would agree to "border security" should tell you something; such as follow the money.

Your disregard for the BoR's and support of the Globalist technocratic "security" apparatus tells me something too.
No, both parties did not agree to border security, the communists were against it, which says everything needed about you.
 
No, both parties did not agree to border security, the communists were against it, which says everything needed about you.

Both parties have been for it at times. Both parties flip flop on the issue regularly.

And you flip flop with your party, if not on that then on issues like Israel. Which says everything that needs be said about you.
 
Both parties have been for it at times. Both parties flip flop on the issue regularly.

And you flip flop with your party, if not on that then on issues like Israel. Which says everything that needs be said about you.
LOL

I have never flip flopped on Israel, I do not support Israel just because I also don't support the islamists and their lies.

And the only time the left flipped on border security was many decades ago when they decided to give up on converting Americans to communism and switch to importing communists, all lip service since then gave exactly zero results and was only to continue to trick their remaining American voters.
 
No, of course you don't. You just call people who say not one bad thing about the US, but criticize Zion, "traitors".

All the time.
LOL

No, you can't point to one time that's true, the closest thing you might dig up is when I point out that they not only oppose Israel, but actively support Hamas and other terrorists.
 
Back
Top