- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 40,050
The fact that ANYBODY is still defending Trump post the Epstein debacle shows you're dealing with people with a reprobate mind.
Bottom Line nothing Trump says can be trusted. We do not know if Ukraine already received or will get, or how many Patriots, ATACMS, JASSMS, or even Tomahawks and the war is long from over; it's going to escalate significantly within weeks. That is at minmum because loads of German offensive weapons are already there and were mentioned as being ready for attack by end of July.
The 50-day ultimatum time frame of late August into early September is "crunch time".
More fake news. Trump asked a simple question and the FT lies and says "encouraged"...
More fake news. Trump asked a simple question and the FT lies and says "encouraged", they lied for clicks and to send the deranged people like Snowball into a conniption fit. The only weapons being provided are defensive patriot missile systems.
You dont need cruise missles that cost millions to hit Moscow. A cheap drone can do it for a fraction of the cost. Not unless there is a high value military target you want to destroy.It happened. What do you expect him to say, "Yeah, we're sending them tomahawks to hit Moscow." ?
The usual lies, but they want to believe so it's taken as gospel.Sources![]()
The usual lies
No, they are not.The sources are clearly shown. What's your source for denying it?
The sources are clearly shown. What's your source for denying it?
No, they are not.
No, FT's are.In other words, your source is you pulled it out of your ass. As usual.
No, FT's are.
LOLAnd I was asking you how you can be sure of that. And you can't.
They literally just said "sources".
Not only is that transparent by itself...
That wall, reminds me of a huge standing urinal?