Trump supported Hillary's Libya agenda from the beginning

It's actually very simple. Instead of running as a Democrat, he is running GOP, so he must attack the Democrats. Some of his kids didn't get the memo though.

UQXQE0k.jpg


He could be martian and still win most votes in an election today as long as he is seen as the most vocal critic of the number one enemy of GOP.

nobel-peace-prize-2009-joke-barack-obama-international-diplomacy-cooperation-peoples-motivational-posters-333x266.jpg


R/D/this/that labels have less currency than ever this time around. He would probably pull many Dem/Indie votes if he got nominaton.
There are quite a few "Republicans who are openly calling for supporting Hillary.
 
OP claim if true would be another inconsarency on part of Trumpster. If he thought SWCs Hillary/Obama were doing the right thing in Libya, how can he say things like below then? His foreign policy team has some explaining to do it seems.

Trump: Clinton, Obama 'created ISIS'

Trump just called Obama a bigger warmonger than Bush


Politicians are known to flip flop but he claims to be a businessman and should behave like one.


Trump doesn't flip flop he takes multiple opposing positions and then his campaign sells it as double think.

https://youtu.be/hZxD_RFvXpA?t=22m26s

O'reilly : Libya- um, the libyan action is being explained as a humanitarian issue to stop a slaughter, do you spport it.

"I support stopping that kind of slaughter, but the problem is where do you stop..."
 
He could be martian and still win most votes in an election today as long as he is seen as the most vocal critic of the number one enemy of GOP.

This is the same delusional thinking that got Mitt's ass kicked in 2012. The only way a GOP ever wins a POTUS election again is to unify behind a candidate with a positive message, not one of bigotry and hate.
 
The only way a GOP ever wins a POTUS election again is to unify behind a candidate with a positive message, not one of bigotry and hate.

Then fakebag "Christian-Zionist" Rafael Cruz along with his neocon masters will be the first one out given their support for violent/racist oppressions and occupations using tax payers money.
Hillary Clinton with her bigoted "superpredator" filled prisons, racially motivated Iraq/mideast bloodbaths support has slim chance. She is also tied to Obama whose empty coached messages with teleprompter have created an "awful legacy" as Bill Clinton noted along with a racist drone killing policy.
Probably the most honest and least bigoted candidate would get the nod this time.
 
Then fakebag "Christian-Zionist" Rafael Cruz along with his neocon masters will be the first one out given their support for violent/racist oppressions and occupations using tax payers money.
Hillary Clinton with her bigoted "superpredator" filled prisons, racially motivated Iraq/mideast bloodbaths support has slim chance. She is also tied to Obama whose empty coached messages with teleprompter have created an "awful legacy" as Bill Clinton noted along with a racist drone killing policy.
Probably the most honest and least bigoted candidate would get the nod this time.

Can you rephrase that, in English?
 
I know I will be neg repped for pointing this out. Some people on this forum just can't handle the truth. But if this doesn't prove Trump is controlled opposition nothing will. Trump called for troops to go into Libya to "stop Khaddafi".




-thanks for sharing this. There are no noninterventionists running from the 2 major parties. :(


I respect your analysis even though I disagree with your ultimate conclusion. When it comes to non-interventionism Cruz is better than Trump because he's been non interventionist when it mattered.

Cruz did say, however, that he wants regime change in Iran:



 
Last edited:
But but but...he's a non-interventionist!

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to jmdrake again"
 
Back
Top