Trump responds to Brussels attack by insulting the ‘city’ of Belgium — and calling for torture

LOLOL

Friend, anyone with an ounce of sense who reads this thread will be able to differentiate the credible from the clowns with the greatest of ease. And their judgment will not come down on the side you think it will.

What's more, they won't have to run to some other thread and look at some mythical slapdown to make the right decision.

But keep repeating your assertion like a good little propagandist. Maybe the other mental incompetents will believe the lie if the read enough repetitions of it.




But keep repeating your assertion like a good little propagandist.

And what makes you? oh thats right a Trump propagandist.
 
acptulsa your exposing yourself by being a hypocrite here by attacking me while your trying to defend trump, i couldn't care less if you exposed Trump or his supporters the way you defend trump because of my thread shows a lot more.
 
Since when is Belgium a city?

What was that you said in your rep message? You thought that was why the word 'city' was in quotes in the thread title?

I'm sure you're right. And I'm equally sure that the OP, who just accused me of being a Trump supporter in a thread where I insulted both Trump and his ignorant supporters, just copied and pasted that headline without having the first clue what that bit of punctuation meant.

Oh, and he gave me a neg rep, too. But that's ok. He didn't begin to undo what your +rep did, thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RJB
One of the lesser-known 57 states, I guess.


Alright, I get it now, didn't see that at first. I'm pretty sure he meant Brussels, geez people, are all of you really going to jump on that?

These people flap their gums and have reporters in their faces all day, if he truly didn't mean Brussels then fine, he's an idiot, but I'd bet that's what he meant.

I hated Obama but I attacked him on real things, not the 57 state stuff, ditto Romney, attacked his policies, not the "I like to fire people".
 
Alright, I get it now, didn't see that at first. I'm pretty sure he meant Brussels, geez people, are all of you really going to jump on that?

These people flap their gums and have reporters in their faces all day, if he truly didn't mean Brussels then fine, he's an idiot, but I'd bet that's what he meant.

I hated Obama but I attacked him on real things, not the 57 state stuff, ditto Romney, attacked his policies, not the "I like to fire people".

We are not actually isolationists, newbie, though we get accused of being the same by politico.com. And we would really prefer a president who can have an off-the-cuff conversation with various foreign potentates without insulting them every few minutes by calling their nations cities. It's just what we want, and all your spam will never talk us out of wanting that. In fact, we consider anyone incapable of that to lack the necessary qualifications for the job.

So sue us if you don't like it.

The politicians have made small business illegal, the corporations are full of middle managers more interested in hiring ass-kissers than competent people who can get the job done, and this has now become so institutionalized that primary voters are more interested in getting their asses kissed just right than in finding competent people to nominate. And then they wonder why independent voters refuse to vote for the clowns they nominate.

No wonder what was once the greatest nation on earth has devolved into a Dilbertian nightmare.

But hey. Attack me some more, guys. Hang some more badges of honor on me. Besides, we're all dying reading your assertions that you wouldn't be insulted, and wouldn't consider him an idiot, if some European said, 'Yeah, the United States of America used to be a nice city...'
 
Last edited:
Dammit! The word is "you're"!!!

Oh, and no. The RPF member to whom you were replying was not showing true colors for Trump at all.

They don't care if their president can differentiate a city and a nation--or a state, or a continent (remember Miss Teen South Carolina?)--and you expect them to worry about a little thing like your and you're being different words with different meanings? Or the fact that their accusations are about 180 degrees off target?

Besides, you're barking up the wrong tree. His English is fine. And here's all the proof anyone could ever need:

My English is fine.
 
Last edited:
They don't care if their president can differentiate a city and a nation--or a state, or a continent (remember Miss Teen South Carolina?)--and you expect them to worry about a little thing like your and you're being different words with different meanings? Or the fact that their accusations are about 180 degrees off target?
But, but, but....he's gonna make 'Murika great agin!!
 
And libertarians know that the only thing anyone can do to make America great again is to get the hell out of the way of the American people.

And Trump has never once suggested that he'll do anything of the sort. Quite the opposite.
Yep. It's not hard for us to figure out why Ron Paul opposes Trump so strongly and warns us about him....most of us see what's wrong without Dr. Paul's warnings, and others are just ignoring the warnings.
 
Nigel Farage said it years ago... He perfectly well knows Belgium is a country though. That's the difference, you can be politically incorrect with a smile while telling the truth. You don't have to be a pompous windbag to do that. Certainly not. For the same reason I find it rather low to attack Trump on his hair, I mean, it does look like shit but it really is the least offensive part about him.
 
He actually said Brussels initially, then this later on:

"Belgium is no longer Belgium. Belgium is not the Belgium that you and I knew, Matt, from 20 years ago, which was one of the most beautiful cities and one of the safest cities in the world. Belgium is a horror show right now.”
 
Nigel Farage said it years ago... He perfectly well knows Belgium is a country though. That's the difference, you can be politically incorrect with a smile while telling the truth. You don't have to be a pompous windbag to do that. Certainly not. For the same reason I find it rather low to attack Trump on his hair, I mean, it does look like $#@! but it really is the least offensive part about him.




Yep. I've always hated it when people dwell on gaffes when there are far bigger reasons to criticize a candidate.
 
Back
Top