Trump repeats debunked voter fraud claim at meeting with Hill leaders

[Superfluous Man]

I am not talking about the tiny minority of people who actually get sex changes, and I doubt he is talking about that either. I am talking about transvestites and other people who one day feel all girly and want to go with how they "identify."

That's what he said he supports. He was asked about it in the context of that exact debate.

 

[timosman]

while not in millions there certainly are several hundred, perhaps thousands, in most states.

this could flip a state, or even the presidency.

I knew someone in the late 70s who had some to the USA from Ireland in the 20s, never became a citizen, and always voted, from the 40s until she died. no one ever asked.

You did not report a crime?

 

[Superfluous Man]

while not in millions there certainly are several hundred, perhaps thousands, in most states.

this could flip a state, or even the presidency.

I knew someone in the late 70s who had some to the USA from Ireland in the 20s, never became a citizen, and always voted, from the 40s until she died. no one ever asked.

No one ever asked what?

She had to register to vote in order for her name to be on the voter list.

 

[CPUd]

 

[Schifference]

officials “couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts” during last month’s countywide canvass of Election Day returns, adding that most are in Clinton stronghold Detroit, “where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.”

 

[dannno]

Wow, thanks for posting.. that's a great interview.

Embarrassed? Really?? The host is saying that when he is saying a number like 3 million, it has to be a fixed, exact number not off by 30,000... What difference does it make?

The polls you post all the time are off by more than this guy's numbers.

Do you REALLY want this information released? You want him to put out the names of millions of people who have committed felonies? Especially when he is admitting the data is only like 99.5% accurate?

He also said that 3 million was the conservative number..

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

That's what he said he supports. He was asked about it in the context of that exact debate.

Source?

 

[CPUd]

Wow, thanks for posting.. that's a great interview.

Embarrassed? Really?? The host is saying that when he is saying a number like 3 million, it has to be a fixed, exact number not off by 30,000... What difference does it make?

The polls you post all the time are off by more than this guy's numbers.

Do you REALLY want this information released? You want him to put out the names of millions of people who have committed felonies? Especially when he is admitting the data is only like 99.5% accurate?

He also said that 3 million was the conservative number..

That's a pretty good impression.

 

[timosman]

That's a pretty good impression.

 

[UWDude]

EGO.

And thanks!

Maybe, just maybe, he actually cares about the integrity of the voting system?


Haters so full of hate, cant even see what is happening.

Ender mr "I try to see both sides"

No you dont

you're just a hater.

 

[staerker]

bump

Veritas Voter Fraud Compilation - #VoterFraudIsReal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCldQRaPXwo

 

[Ender]

Maybe, just maybe, he actually cares about the integrity of the voting system?


Haters so full of hate, cant even see what is happening.

Ender mr "I try to see both sides"

No you dont

you're just a hater.

LOL

Looking in the mirror, Mr. Name-Caller?

 

[timosman]

LOL

Looking in the mirror, Mr. Name-Caller?

Ender aka. Zippy lite.

 

[Zippyjuan]

bump

Can we see the unedited interview? Veritas is famous for editing videos to change what was really said to support their viewpoint.

 

[timosman]

Can we see the unedited interview? Veritas is famous for editing videos to change what was really said to support their viewpoint.

Working on Saturday and Sunday?! I am getting worried about your operation. I would not work for anybody who does not observe Sabbath.

 

[staerker]

Can we see the unedited interview? Veritas is famous for editing videos to change what was really said to support their viewpoint.

Which one was edited to change what was really said?

 

[Zippyjuan]

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/18/jam...ing-hillary-clinton-campaign-is-bird-dogging/

O’Keefe and Project Veritas have been criticized in the past, however, for strategically editing footage to make false accusations.

In 2013, O’Keefe settled a suit for $100,000 after editing a recording with an ACORN employee who subsequently lost his job. Similarly, after O’Keefe and an associate posed as donors affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood in a sting operation at NPR, The Blaze examined the edited video against the raw footage and found manipulative editing.

He also basically says so in this tweet about refusing to release unedited video: https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/788771857814069250?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

James O'Keefe
‏@JamesOKeefeIII

Follow
More
James O'Keefe Retweeted David Frum

Are "journalists" willing to produce their raw unedited materials to accompany their word arrangements? It'd probably paint a diff picture!

And here: http://thedailybanter.com/2016/10/v...eefe-refuses-to-release-unedited-dem-footage/

SEDER: But you can debunk that by releasing that video. Why wouldn’t you release all the video?

O’KEEFE: Because no journalist in their right mind would ever release their raw notebooks and if they did, Sam--

SEDER: Well, it’s not a notebook. It is caught on camera.

O’KEEFE: Let me tell you something: No journalist ever releases the raw, and the reason, and if they did, if all these journalists released the raw, you would see a different story. They piece words together to paint a specific portrait.

SEDER: So you paste the words together to paint--

O’KEEFE: No. I have video. I don’t just have words. I have video.
[...]

SEDER: Are you saying you did piece it together to paint a picture?

O’KEEFE: That’s what journalism is. Journalism is telling a story. And I will stand by every single edit. I will go to -- I will be in contempt of court to protect my undercover reporters because I’m standing for something greater than myself. I’m standing for the right of citizen journalists. No one here would ever dare release their raw. No one would.

 

[staerker]

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/18/jam...ing-hillary-clinton-campaign-is-bird-dogging/

Okay troll. So tell me, which one was edited to change what was really said?

 

[Zippyjuan]

Read much?

Similarly, after O’Keefe and an associate posed as donors affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood in a sting operation at NPR, The Blaze examined the edited video against the raw footage and found manipulative editing.

Also: https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...7290af48a49_story.html?utm_term=.b9e7321160a4

An even bigger issue, however, has been the way in which O’Keefe has edited some of his videos.

In 2009, he and an associate posed as a pimp and prostitute to infiltrate ACORN, a community social-services agency. The resulting video showed ACORN members offering the pair advice on how to set up a brothel. It also showed outtakes of O’Keefe and his partner dressed in the flamboyant attire of street hustlers, suggesting they had appeared that way when they spoke to the officials. In fact, the footage of the pair in costume was spliced into the video after the ACORN meetings, a fact the video didn’t mention.

Congress subsequently defunded ACORN, leading to its demise. O’Keefe was later sued by one of his subjects, who claimed his privacy had been invaded by the surreptitious filming; O’Keefe settled the matter for $100,000, admitting no guilt.

O’Keefe’s 2011 sting of NPR executives was fraught with discrepancies between what one of the executives said and how his comments were framed in the video. Then-NPR executive Ron Schiller was quoted in the video as saying that tea party activists were “seriously racist people.” But the raw footage of the encounter showed that Schiller was quoting two Republicans who viewed the activists that way, not that he held such views.

 

[staerker]

Read much?

Source fake news much? I don't need an anonymous quote to tell me what to think.

I know for a fact that you won't be able to point out any deceptive editing in the video I posted above.

You are here to troll and disrupt, not to have a conversation based in reality.