Trump: Not a fan of Bitcoin (which is not money)

I read an interesting anecdote from the man who ghost-wrote The Art of the Deal. He basically said that he never saw any books around in all of the time he worked with Trump on TAOTD and he didn't think Trump had ever actually even read a book before. I'm sure a quick google search would find the comments.



I was staying at a hotel the other day and I couldn't get the inputs to switch to HDMI so I could watch my firestick on the hotel tv. I went to the front desk and asked if they had a remote, the older woman there said it was against hotel policy. I told her nobody watches tv anymore. She said thought someone had left something inappropriate hooked up one time or something, but wasn't sure. Anyway, that's why she reads books. She was reading a book at the front desk. I can't figure out what book it was, but it had a huge picture of Hillary Clinton on the cover. It's too bad more people aren't like her and you guys, then we could all go back to living in 1915.
 
I think there are three main categories of people who don't like bitcoin, which are all overlapping:

A. People who aren't smart

B. People who don't understand bitcoin

C. People who are living in the past and are not very adaptable

ScreenHunter_159-Oct.-13-14.54.jpg



Then there is a fourth category - people who are threatened by bitcoin. These are the elite bankers, politicians and corporate interests who are dependent on the banks to support their candidacies.
 
So if you don't like bitcoin you are old and stupid.

Nope.. well possibly. But not definetely. Maybe you are in the stupid category. I even posted this chart yet some how you came up with that reply:

ScreenHunter_159-Oct.-13-14.54.jpg


I also didn't say anything about being old. We have at least one member here who is quite young, but lives in olden times and acts like he is old.
 
Bitcoin is up about 5% after the tweet.

It also went significantly up after facebook announce their Libra coin.

The more the establishment pushes their anti-bitcoin rhetoric, the higher it goes. It's like magic.
..
 
I think there are three main categories of people who don't like bitcoin, which are all overlapping:

A. People who aren't smart

B. People who don't understand bitcoin

C. People who are living in the past and are not very adaptable

ScreenHunter_159-Oct.-13-14.54.jpg



Then there is a fourth category - people who are threatened by bitcoin. These are the elite bankers, politicians and corporate interests who are dependent on the banks to support their candidacies.

5th category, people who lost all their Bitcoin and now too late to get in. Due to either exchange bankruptcies, deleted their wallets, theft or sold before the boom.
 
Only eleven percent even own bitcoins in the US. 90% of those have less than a tenth of a bitcoin. That means that 99% of the population has a tenth or less of a bitcoin (about $110 or less in bitcoin).
https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2018/12/12/bitcoin-addresses-mostly-empty/

80% of wallets holding Bitcoin contain less than $100

This ball-busting bear market has lasted almost a full year. No better time to check on how the circulating supply of Bitcoin $BTC▲4.66% is currently distributed.

Recent analysis run by digital asset research firm Delphi found 22.9 million Bitcoin addresses currently hold some Bitcoin (as in, more than none).

Uncomfortably, nearly half contain less than 0.001 BTC ($3.40), and almost 90 percent hold less than one-tenth of a BTC ($340).

December 2018.
 
Last edited:
I think there are three main categories of people who don't like bitcoin, which are all overlapping:

A. People who aren't smart
B. People who don't understand bitcoin
C. People who are living in the past and are not very adaptable

Then there is a fourth category - people who are threatened by bitcoin. These are the elite bankers, politicians and corporate interests who are dependent on the banks to support their candidacies.
Which of those applies to Trump?
 
And crashing into a cliff wall and crumbling to dust.


I was thinking grain of sand, but dust particles is possibly closer, either way, I see it as
'cashless' , and likely to already be a CIA plant or some Globally funded OP.

What was that story a few weeks ago,,,,,,, 90% of trades are/were essentially 'make believe'
internal trading....
 
I was thinking grain of sand, but dust particles is possibly closer, either way, I see it as
'cashless' , and likely to already be a CIA plant or some Globally funded OP.

What was that story a few weeks ago,,,,,,, 90% of trades are/were essentially 'make believe'
internal trading....

LOL, ya, keep believing the deep state and their anti-crypto propaganda.

You should subscribe to zippy's newsletter.
 
LOL, ya, keep believing the deep state and their anti-crypto propaganda.

You should subscribe to zippy's newsletter.

You ready to discredit Catherine Fitts, lol , I'm ready for this, she's fkg crazy right?


: )

And comical you get triggered and bring up Zippy's name, he has never commented
on Bitsht being a CIA or any other OP that I'm aware of....... nice try.

I hope you make money at this, cause you sure defend the sht out of this cashless society, fiat
joke.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking grain of sand, but dust particles is possibly closer, either way, I see it as
'cashless' , and likely to already be a CIA plant or some Globally funded OP.

What was that story a few weeks ago,,,,,,, 90% of trades are/were essentially 'make believe'
internal trading....
When translated out of Japanese the name of the fictional inventor means "Central Intelligence".
 
LOL, ya, keep believing the deep state and their anti-crypto propaganda.

You should subscribe to zippy's newsletter.

Uh, you do know they coded "SATOSHI NAKEMOTO" into the cover of the Rothschild's 1988 Economist magazine cover, that announced the planned intro of cryptocurrencies 31 years ago, right?

Deep state anti-crypto propaganda :rolleyes: ffs

I get it, you're all in crypto. Great. I'm sure it's treated you well but don't insult my intelligence with that "deep state" nonsense.
 
Uh, you do know they coded "SATOSHI NAKEMOTO" into the cover of the Rothschild's 1988 Economist magazine cover, that announced the planned intro of cryptocurrencies 31 years ago, right?

Can you explain that?
 
It's "comes" not "goes":

20170709_econ.jpg


Are you saying it's an anagram?
Because "SATOSHI NAKEMOTO" has neither a "c" nor a "g".

Whatever. The letters are right there. And the Economist is known for coding stuff into their covers.
 
Back
Top