Trump Nominates Dr. Jay Bhattacharya To Lead NIH

otherone

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2011
Messages
9,632
President-elect Donald Trump announced on Tuesday night that he has nominated Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, to serve as Director of the National Institutes of Health.

“Dr. Bhattacharya will work in cooperation with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to direct the Nation’s Medical Research, and to make important discoveries that will improve Health, and save lives,” Trump said in a statement.

Bhattacharya is a professor at the Stanford School of Medicine and focuses on health policy related to infectious diseases, COVID-19, and health economics.

Trump said Bhattacharya and RFK Jr. would “restore the NIH to a Gold Standard of Medical Research as they examine the underlying causes of, and solutions to, America’s biggest Health challenges, including our Crisis of Chronic Illness and Disease.”

“Together, Jay and RFK Jr. will restore the NIH to a Gold Standard of Medical Research as they examine the underlying causes of, and solutions to, America’s biggest Health challenges, including our Crisis of Chronic Illness and Disease. Together, they will work hard to Make America Healthy Again!”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/trump-nominates-dr-jay-bhattacharya-to-lead-nih
 
Via Tom Woods

The nomination of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to be the director of the National Institutes of Health is the single greatest case of poetic justice in my lifetime.

Jay, who holds both an MD as well as a PhD in economics, is a professor at Stanford University.

During the COVID years he had to endure the slings and arrows of mental and moral midgets who were unfit to shine his shoes.

He correctly spoke out against the useless and evil lockdown policy as well as much of the rest of the madness.

Now that it's obvious that none of those things did any good, and simply destroyed millions of lives for no good reason, some people are trying to pretend they never supported any of it.

But we remember the truth, and how those people behaved toward decent people and brilliant scientists like Jay.

Jay was smeared by Francis Collins, who was director of the very institution Jay will now direct, as a "fringe epidemiologist" because he correctly insisted that lockdowns were no part of any pandemic policy ever proposed anywhere.

Collins has since admitted that his institution had major blind spots during COVID. But Jay wasn't blind. The mild-mannered Jay Bhattacharya, who never sought the spotlight but was forced into it by events, spoke the truth from day one, and for that he has the gratitude of all thinking people everywhere.

https://x.com/ThomasEWoods/status/1861592650388000865
 
Great pick indeed.

I also can't help thinking that Directors come and go, and wonder in 4 years the next prez inserts somebody else into that position. Trump seems to be clutching on to these departments in order to regain "trust in government" [per the WEF] rather than to eliminate them.

I take it that "Government Has No Business In Healthcare" is every bit as popular as the "Bill of Rights" these days. Signed, the Purist.
 
Who's Makary?

Marty Makary:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Makary was an early advocate for universal masking to control the pandemic and recommended vaccines for adults.


In February 2020, Makary was vocal that the United States needed to take the threat of COVID-19 seriously and that people should stop all non-essential travel. He warned of disruptions to both the United States healthcare system and to people's daily lives. In addition Makary called for a national lockdown to help slow the spread of the virus and enable the healthcare system to respond and reduce morbidity and mortality.


Makary considers himself pro-vaccine but has also criticized vaccination mandates for populations other than healthcare workers. Makary recommended a single-dose mRNA vaccine regimen for children 12-17 to minimize the occurrence of myocarditis as a reaction, contrary to the CDC's finding that the risks of infection "far outweigh" those of the two-dose vaccine schedule. In December 2021 he appeared on a podcast to argue against vaccine boosters, referring to himself as an "unboosted male" and saying that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was "nature's vaccine".


Lots more here both pro and con:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marty_Makary


Makary donated to Barack Obama's Presidential Campaign in 2008, not that it really means anything(?).
 
Last edited:
Great pick indeed.

I also can't help thinking that Directors come and go, and wonder in 4 years the next prez inserts somebody else into that position. Trump seems to be clutching on to these departments in order to regain "trust in government" [per the WEF] rather than to eliminate them.

I take it that "Government Has No Business In Healthcare" is every bit as popular as the "Bill of Rights" these days. Signed, the Purist.

Man, you REALLY have the most pessimistic outlook on life. It's a hallmark of the unconstrained vision, BTW.

This is an A+ pick - hands down!
 
Man, you REALLY have the most pessimistic outlook on life. It's a hallmark of the unconstrained vision, BTW.

This is an A+ pick - hands down!

I'm blind as a bat regarding this guy... No idear if its a wise choce, but have heard positives
 
Great pick indeed.

I also can't help thinking that Directors come and go, and wonder in 4 years the next prez inserts somebody else into that position. Trump seems to be clutching on to these departments in order to regain "trust in government" [per the WEF] rather than to eliminate them.

I take it that "Government Has No Business In Healthcare" is every bit as popular as the "Bill of Rights" these days. Signed, the Purist.



Man, you REALLY have the most pessimistic outlook on life. It's a hallmark of the unconstrained vision, BTW.

This is an A+ pick - hands down!


You came from the Left, didn't you.

I can tell, because I have a whole lot of experience vetting candidates in my area for groups wanting to run candidates - until those candidates got busted.
 
I'm blind as a bat regarding this guy... No idear if its a wise choce, but have heard positives

Post #9 for the pros and cons. He's basically a good guy, and perhaps a good pick if one is to retain an agency, but he has made pretty big errors concerning nationalistic suggestions, so to speak.
 
You came from the Left, didn't you.

I can tell, because I have a whole lot of experience vetting candidates in my area for groups wanting to run candidates - until those candidates got busted.

Before I started thinking about the issues, I probably leaned left. Might have been a product of growing up in the ghettos of DC? But by the time I was old enough to vote, I joined the LP. Once I saw the pointless circular firing squad up close, I sat out. Only to be re-invigored when Ron Paul ran for President.

I'll take Bhattacharya all day to lead the NIH!
 
Before I started thinking about the issues, I probably leaned left. Might have been a product of growing up in the ghettos of DC? But by the time I was old enough to vote, I joined the LP. Once I saw the pointless circular firing squad up close, I sat out. Only to be re-invigored when Ron Paul ran for President.

I'll take Bhattacharya all day to lead the NIH!


Vetting candidates, at least in my area [and other areas too], my batting average is still 100% :up::cool:
 
Good.

Hopefully this reflects a genuine change for Trump. He'll still never admit he did anything wrong in his COVID response. But this move bodes well regardless.
 
You came from the Left, didn't you.

Regardless where I came from, I'm standing in the same place as you right now. And if not the exact same place, we can at least touch fingers.
And yet I'm excited, and you're not.
I'm not excited because of what Trump is going to do. I mean there's some of that, because there's some incremental improvement queued up to happen.
I'm excited because this is basically Obama times a thousand.
We have ourselves a genuine political savior coming in.

And when he fails to deliver, the way Obama failed, he's going to fail a thousand times worse and people are going to be a thousand times more pissed about it.

Obama's failures are a big part of the reason why Trump got elected this time. Giant authoritarian government has clearly been rejected. Everyone is on the minarchism page right now.
You and I both know that what we have always had for our entire lives is minarchism. The problem isn't going away because the existence of the state is the problem. They might give the monster a haircut and it'll grow back as fast as hair.

Nobody admits this - but read the room. The sentiment isn't that we're going to make any real progress. It's that we're going to try to return things to where they were. And I think, PAF, you are the perfect person to realize that even when things were 'great' they still kinda sucked.

The reason why this is a win is because in the years to come more and more people are going to start asking fundamental questions like 'hey how come there's still inflation' and 'how come the medical industrial complex is still making us sick' and 'how come we're still in foreign wars'. The media that previously effectively convinced everyone to ignore this stuff is now officially a laughingstock. So they're going to keep asking and when the New Obama doesn't fix it, they're not going to be happy. Even if it is 'better' by then.

People aren't listening now. But they will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PAF
Regardless where I came from, I'm standing in the same place as you right now. And if not the exact same place, we can at least touch fingers.
And yet I'm excited, and you're not.
I'm not excited because of what Trump is going to do. I mean there's some of that, because there's some incremental improvement queued up to happen.
I'm excited because this is basically Obama times a thousand.
We have ourselves a genuine political savior coming in.

And when he fails to deliver, the way Obama failed, he's going to fail a thousand times worse and people are going to be a thousand times more pissed about it.

Obama's failures are a big part of the reason why Trump got elected this time. Giant authoritarian government has clearly been rejected. Everyone is on the minarchism page right now.
You and I both know that what we have always had for our entire lives is minarchism. The problem isn't going away because the existence of the state is the problem. They might give the monster a haircut and it'll grow back as fast as hair.

Nobody admits this - but read the room. The sentiment isn't that we're going to make any real progress. It's that we're going to try to return things to where they were. And I think, PAF, you are the perfect person to realize that even when things were 'great' they still kinda sucked.

The reason why this is a win is because in the years to come more and more people are going to start asking fundamental questions like 'hey how come there's still inflation' and 'how come the medical industrial complex is still making us sick' and 'how come we're still in foreign wars'. The media that previously effectively convinced everyone to ignore this stuff is now officially a laughingstock. So they're going to keep asking and when the New Obama doesn't fix it, they're not going to be happy. Even if it is 'better' by then.

People aren't listening now. But they will be.


I hadn't thought of it in those words, but, well said :up:


I'm still going to hold them accountable, though, and chew them apart; they have no business [other than self-interest] voting against individualism and the BoR.
 
Great pick, but I feel like RFK would have been a good choice as well instead of being HHS.

I think RFK JR should have been put over the FDA or EPA. I think a doctor should be over HHS such as Dr. Ben Carson or Dr. Joseph Lapado.
 
Back
Top