Trump names new fighter jet after himself

[nikcers]

If we only had a mind blowing stock pile of nukes.

We actually dismantled our peacemaker nuclear ICBM missles and we dismantled our f-22 program.

It's not mutual destruction if I can't nuke them back after they nuke me.

Obama said the cold war was over.

Air superiority is part of the delivery of our nuclear triad. We can't deliver a nuclear warhead by air if they just shoot down all of our bombers.

Obviously they don't have this capability now but they will in 10 years.

 

[unknown]

Fuck the F-47.

And FUCK the Pentagon.

 

[Swordsmyth]

sorry, but DARPA says Obama did it.

DARPA wins.

DARPA doesn't say that, they say that past things under O'Bummer contributed.
By your logic the Wright Brothers did it.

Your TDS is driving you to absurd and petty nonsense.
Cry harder, it's the F-47 and you can't do anything about it.

 

[acptulsa]

The neoconservative foreign policy is much different than what I would ever advocate for.

Take a harder look at yourself, neocon.

 

[nikcers]

Looks like it's confirmed to be getting the 6th-generation adaptive engine that allows for 30% more range and better cooling using ceramic matrix composites and the increased cooling and power generation also enables the potential employment of 'directed energy weapons' surpassing the capabilities of fourth- and fifth-generation engines.

The XA100 engine was successfully tested on the F-35 as an upgrade. The technology will be ported to the F-47.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/202...s-key-design-reviews-prototype-work-underway/

 

[Anti Globalist]

I figured he would have called it the F-45-47 to reference both of his presidencies.

 

[idiom]

Ukraine is bleeding Russia out right now because Russia can't use nukes. Tanks are being destroyed with $200 cardboard drones.

Nobody will buy the F-47 but America because Trump just jettisoned all good faith.

None of this stuff is built to fight AI.

 

[nikcers]

Ukraine is bleeding Russia out right now because Russia can't use nukes. Tanks are being destroyed with $200 cardboard drones.

Nobody will buy the F-47 but America because Trump just jettisoned all good faith.

None of this stuff is built to fight AI.

Our 6th generation fighter jets will be the first fully AI fighter jet we build.

It will have technologies in it that we can't export.

They might make an export model but we never exported our f-22 for that reason.

Plenty of countries would want to buy it. Nobody has jet engines like the ones in the F-47

They wanted to buy the F-22 and it's an F-22 on steroids.

 

[idiom]

An AI fighter jet can turn a lot harder for a lot longer than one with a human in it. But its designed to be something of a local mothership for human oversight of more aggressive autonomous fighters.

Its main role is propping Boeing up long enough for Boeing to figure out how to execute complex hardware again.

Trumps tariffs will lead to Boeing owning the US commercial market (~25%) and airbus getting the rest of the world without a fight.

Although an airforce isn't in the enumerated powers, so really you should be doubling the carrier fleet and making sure all fighters are carrier native.

 

[nikcers]

An AI fighter jet can turn a lot harder for a lot longer than one with a human in it. But its designed to be something of a local mothership for human oversight of more aggressive autonomous fighters.

Its main role is propping Boeing up long enough for Boeing to figure out how to execute complex hardware again.

Trumps tariffs will lead to Boeing owning the US commercial market (~25%) and airbus getting the rest of the world without a fight.

Although an airforce isn't in the enumerated powers, so really you should be doubling the carrier fleet and making sure all fighters are carrier native.

Our air bases are the aircraft carriers on land that defend our homeland and we want something more powerful that deters a war.

We need something for a war that we don't want to fight but we could win over land if they made it past our navy- if we had to.

 

[idiom]

Our air bases are the aircraft carriers on land that defend our homeland and we want something more powerful that deters a war.

We need something for a war that we don't want to fight but we could win over land if they made it past our navy- if we had to.

Somebody has been watching way too much red dawn. It's Canada and Mexico that need land based defence in North America.

 

[nikcers]

Somebody has been watching way too much red dawn. It's Canada and Mexico that need land based defence in North America.

The US has more territory than the mainland to defend.

NORAD: F-22s intercept Russian bombers near Alaska

The interception is the latest in a series of such encounters with Russian aircraft near Alaska in recent months.

www.airforcetimes.com

 

[69360]

The neoconservative foreign policy is much different than what I would ever advocate for.

This is more of a cold war strategy that predates the neocon foreign policy.

Mutually assured destruction works.

This is closer to an Eisenhower doctrine and a Nixon Doctrine than a neocon foreign policy.

Right now we have mutually assured destruction but in 10 to 15 years from now we won't if we don't make the investments.

No, you are advocating for a full on raging neocon foreign policy.

 

[acptulsa]

No, you are advocating for a full on raging neocon foreign policy.

I'd call him a turboneocon except there's nothing remotely conservative about him. He's whatever this is:



I think they call that "zionist".