Trump Moves To ABOLISH The Federal Reserve And Institute Gold Standard

[dannno]

Do you know who all in Trump's cabinet has worked for Goldman Sachs?

 

[The Rebel Poet]

 

[jmdrake]

Do you know who all in Trump's cabinet has worked for Goldman Sachs?

We know the treasury secretary he nominated worked for Goldman Sachs. The Trump pumpers attacked Ted Cruz for merely being married to someone who worked for Goldman Sachs.

 

[jmdrake]

I've decided that I'm not unhappy about Goldman Sachs exec because they use a lot of smart people there and it doesn't mean they are all globalists, just being used by them.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Do you know who all in Trump's cabinet has worked for Goldman Sachs?

Some: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...an-is-back-on-top-in-the-trump-administration

One night in early December, a Goldman Sachs partner walked out of the Pierre hotel in Manhattan with a big grin on his face. He’d spent the evening at the bank’s annual alumni dinner, and there was a lot to celebrate. For starters, shares of Goldman Sachs were on a tear, having rallied about 30 percent in the month since Donald Trump was elected president. Trump had also restarted an age-old tradition of presidents naming Goldmanites to top spots in their administration.

Former Goldman Sachs partner Steven Mnuchin served as Trump’s national finance chairman and is now Trump’s nominee for U.S. Treasury secretary. Trump has also tapped Goldman Sachs President (and the bank’s de facto No. 2) Gary Cohn to be his top economic adviser in the White House. Other Goldman alums in Trump’s inner circle include Anthony Scaramucci, a former Goldman banker and a member of the Trump transition team’s executive committee, as well as Steve Bannon, Trump’s campaign manager.

 

[Madison320]

Truly private institutions are great. Truly public institutions are okay. Quasi private/public institutions are often monsters. Private / public for profit prisons for example. They take some of their profits and use it to lobby for bills designed to make even more things "crimes" so that they can fill up even more prison space and make even more money. The federal reserve is a quasi private entity. And I think you understand that and you were just reacting to the use of the word "private" as a pejorative? So maybe if everyone said "quasi private" there would be no confusion.

I guess it could've been worse, he could've wrote, "FOR PROFIT".

 

[bubbleboy]

Departmentalization boys. Doesn't mean they're blue bloods. We drafted the top players and now we can use the brilliance of their minds. Trump knows what he is doing and my gut feels good about it. Trump also keeps enemies close.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Just means the bankers have more inside influence under Trump (assuming they get approved) than they did under Obama. Power to the people? Or to the rich people?

 

[devil21]

If he actually tries this, I may consider offering some support for Trump... Proof will be when the privately owned central bank makes a move to have Trump assassinated, which I hope does not happen, but would be not so different than Kennedy, Lincoln, or Jackson.

The issue is what is born out of the ending of the Fed. It sounds great on the surface, however the bankers have been planning this for years and long before Trump even declared as a presidential nominee. He's already shown he has no trouble taking credit (he is a PR man) for things that were already in the works before he showed up.

If you haven't read my "Interesting Canadian Appeals Court Ruling" thread in this subforum yet, you should. This is all part of the banker plan/script so be careful getting too amped up about the rhetoric from Trump. As always, watch what they do and ignore what they say.

Besides, if Trump doesn't have to dodge any bullets then you know he's just doing what he's told to.

 

[Jamesiv1]

Libertas et Bruté

 

[H. E. Panqui]

"Allison wants to abolish Federal Reserve all together and go back to the gold standard."



...at risk of being labelled a monetary-realist and party pooper...i believe you'll find [if you can put the ludwig THEORY/FANTASY away for even a little bit] that there has NEVER been any honest 'gold standard' upon which to 'go back to'...i believe you'll find that back during the phony u.s./state 'gold' era about which the author ludwigs, the banksters credited 'loan accounts' with many many more 'promises to redeem in gold' than they held/had in actual gold for redemption...[clearly fraud]

...you see, 'our' monetary system/order has always been fk'd...i believe it to be at the root of the rot...that's why it's NEVER EVER discussed honestly, knowledgeably, etc., by the corporate political parties, corporate media, etc..[this insane financial order has 'ben berry berry good' to them...]

...most people are worse than ignorant about even the basic origin, nature, etc., of the 'dollars' for which they devote a large portion of their lives, their souls...what they believe they 'know' is hor$esh!t..

...our master$ use 'the money power' to treat people like stinking corporation$...as they treat stinking corporation$ like people!...

...discuss among yourselves...

 

[Zippyjuan]

Ah the good old days- when gold was money, everybody had good, well paying job and there was no inflation. Except it never happened like that.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Ah the good old days- when gold was money, everybody had good, well paying job and there was no inflation. Except it never happened like that.

Except people had more freedom because there was less regulation and fewer laws. That's the X factor.

 

[Dr.No.]

Except people had more freedom because there was less regulation and fewer laws. That's the X factor.

Well, the vast majority of the time the US had been on the gold standard, many, many people in the country were not "free".

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Well, the vast majority of the time the US had been on the gold standard, many, many people in the country were not "free".

No, not a "vast majority" of the time. Not even a majority of the time.

 

[Dr.No.]

No, not a "vast majority" of the time. Not even a majority of the time.

Well, even if you only count slavery as not having freedom (forget about the other governmental and non-governmental tyrannies that effectively stripped people of their freedoms), 1607 to 1865 is 258 years. From 1865 to 1971 is only 106 years...plus, the US had largely abandoned the gold standard in 1933.

 

[DamianTV]

The issue is what is born out of the ending of the Fed. It sounds great on the surface, however the bankers have been planning this for years and long before Trump even declared as a presidential nominee. He's already shown he has no trouble taking credit (he is a PR man) for things that were already in the works before he showed up.

If you haven't read my "Interesting Canadian Appeals Court Ruling" thread in this subforum yet, you should. This is all part of the banker plan/script so be careful getting too amped up about the rhetoric from Trump. As always, watch what they do and ignore what they say.

Besides, if Trump doesn't have to dodge any bullets then you know he's just doing what he's told to.

Agreed. It is not enough to simply "End the Fed". What is more important is what the Fed is replaced with. Probably another form of Central Bank is what is planned by them, but what is not in the works is any form of Honest Money System that frees the ordinary man from the clutches of money manipulators.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Well, even if you only count slavery as not having freedom (forget about the other governmental and non-governmental tyrannies that effectively stripped people of their freedoms), 1607 to 1865 is 258 years. From 1865 to 1971 is only 106 years...plus, the US had largely abandoned the gold standard in 1933.

What in the world are you even talking about? So a metal being valuable is connected with slavery.

You get a neg rep for not only be a shill, but for being a crappy shill.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

Agreed. It is not enough to simply "End the Fed". What is more important is what the Fed is replaced with. Probably another form of Central Bank is what is planned by them, but what is not in the works is any form of Honest Money System that frees the ordinary man from the clutches of money manipulators.

Yeah, if end the Fed ever really becomes popular we'll see one of the major parties step up with a repeal and replace campaign.

 

[devil21]

Agreed. It is not enough to simply "End the Fed". What is more important is what the Fed is replaced with. Probably another form of Central Bank is what is planned by them, but what is not in the works is any form of Honest Money System that frees the ordinary man from the clutches of money manipulators.

I watched my dogs chase squirrels and rabbits through the snow and wondered "OK, the chase is fun but what would you do if you caught the rabbit?" The 45 pound little one chased after a pair of grown deer even. He showed back up gassed but had a great time. The deer still come back around every night.