Trump lays a rotten egg

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

No I'm not. All I'm saying is that you have no right to prevent anyone else from doing that. You can control your own property, and that's all.

And you have no right to force me or anyone else into a political union with a bunch of third world savages.

 

[moostraks]

"False allegations"? Okay. Is America Indian paganism wrong?

SF you have a whole lists of questions you have failed to respond to in the past before you may try this very boring and ignorant attempt at religion one upmanship. You can start with have you stopped beating your wife, yes or no, and work you way from there. 'Kay?

 

[erowe1]

Earth to erowe.

Legal immigration means following our immigration laws.

Yeah, but not our existing ones, which was what he said. Rand wants to change the laws.

 

[erowe1]

And you have no right to force me or anyone else into a political union with a bunch of third world savages.

Of course not. And I would never want to.

 

[kahless]

When you describe an entire race all 1 billion of them and lump them into 1 stereotype, you are being racist. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand that. This is the real world, why don't you join us? Moron

I never posted in this thread you idiot, my response to that is in my quote below from the other thread. Go back and read what I wrote via rep. Your behavior to other forum members in this thread is uncalled for as well as continually trashing Rand in the Justin Amash forum.

Secondly I am still waiting for you to explain your rep how I am a Communist and racist for not liking Colbert in the other thread.

You are delusional since where have I done that anywhere in this thread or my entire history of posting in this forum since 07. What you describe is the antithesis of my ideology but more importantly what does any of this have to do with Colbert?

It is just a TV show, get over it pal, not everyone is going to like what you like or have interest in Progressive TV programs.

I do not know whether to be honored or not that you went through all that effort of giving out 30+ reps just so you could give me three negatives in such a short period of time. Your a nutter, get help pal.

 

[Sola_Fide]

SF you have a whole lists of questions you have failed to respond to in the past before you may try this very boring and ignorant attempt at religion one upmanship. You can start with have you stopped beating your wife, yes or no, and work you way from there. 'Kay?

How in any way is that a question like "have you stopped beating your wife"? How ridiculous.

Every Christian can tell you, based on their belief in the Bible, that American Indian paganism is wrong. You don't believe it's wrong because you aren't a Christian.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

How many Syrians will be shacking up at your house erowe1?

You probably won't get an answer to that.

It appears as though erowe1's master plan is to encourage as much immigration as possible in hopes of converting as many of them as possible to his church. Then they would be qualified to stay in his church or his voluntary community. If they don't convert, or God forbid they become Catholic or the wrong kind of Protestant, then the door to his church is closed. After that, it's up to somebody else to take care of them. US taxpayers no doubt.

 

[erowe1]

How many Syrians will be shacking up at your house erowe1?

Probably none. That's one of the infinitely many freedoms I have, and that ought to be respected, that I may not exercise.

It goes beyond that anyway. If I don't put them up in my own home, I may still contribute to a charity that will help provide shelter for them. I may want to rent a place out to one. I may want to hire one to do work on my property. Any laws that prohibit me from doing any of these things are wrong. And that's what our immigration laws boil down to.

 

[hells_unicorn]

Yes, yes, I know you see yourself as the only Injun on this board.

Technically speaking, I'd fail the single drop of blood theory on account of my Injun lineage on my mother's side, but I think moostraks is more into the Native religion side of it, which I'm not into. She misses the boat on thinking that she can merge Christianity with said superstitions, as well as modern American liberalism, which draws her intelligence into question. Suffice to say, I don't think her woes are even worthy of an eye roll.

 

[erowe1]

After that, it's up to somebody else to take care of them. US taxpayers no doubt.

Where did you get that idea?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Where did you get that idea?

From all of the pundits and politicians on TV saying that we (aka US taxpayers) need to spend massive money to help them and also bring more refugees to the US.

Why, were you planning on buying them a plane ticket back if they don't join your church?

 

[hells_unicorn]

Probably none. That's one of the infinitely many freedoms I have, and that ought to be respected, that I may not exercise.

The question isn't whether you will exercise your freedom to put up potential enemies of the church or not, the question is whether you think it is permissible to compel the rest of us to put up with them being involved in our political process or openly practicing idolatry in our midst. If somebody else volunteers to let these people in, they volunteer for the rest of us to deal with the consequences without our consent.

It goes beyond that anyway. If I don't put them up in my own home, I may still contribute to a charity that will help provide shelter for them. I may want to rent a place out to one. I may want to hire one to do work on my property. Any laws that prohibit me from doing any of these things are wrong. And that's what our immigration laws boil down to.

Would your charitable acts extend to defying the OT standard of allowing them to practice false worship in your household or whatever place that you happen to have them put up? You know where both the OT and NT stands on blessing people in their sins, right?

If you think that trustees of Mohammedan superstition are interested solely in sojourning and not up to mischief of some other sort, you'll be in for a very rude awakening.

 

[twomp]

I never posted in this thread you idiot, my response to that is in my quote below from the other thread. Go back and read what I wrote via rep. Your behavior to other forum members in this thread is uncalled for as well as continually trashing Rand in the Justin Amash forum.

Secondly I am still waiting for you to explain your rep how I am a Communist and racist for not liking Colbert in the other thread.

LOL aren't you a drama queen? Your husband must neglect you. "Continually thrashing Rand in the Justin Amash forum" to you is making a post stating FACTS about what he said. I'm sorry your tiny fragile ego can't take it when someone criticizes Senator Paul for something. Maybe you should take a break from the forums if little things like this get you so worked up. Bake some cookies and look at butterflies or something. Rand Paul isn't God. He makes mistakes like normal humans do and when he does, its okay to criticize him.

 

[JK/SEA]

LOL aren't you a drama queen? Your husband must neglect you. "Continually thrashing Rand in the Justin Amash forum" to you is making a post stating FACTS about what he said. I'm sorry your tiny fragile ego can't take it when someone criticizes Senator Paul for something. Maybe you should take a break from the forums if little things like this get you so worked up. Bake some cookies and look at butterflies or something. Rand Paul isn't God. He makes mistakes like normal humans do and when he does, its okay to criticize him.

not a problem with me if you critique Rand, as long as you critique all the other candidates as well.....do you?

 

[kahless]

LOL aren't you a drama queen? Your husband must neglect you. "Continually thrashing Rand in the Justin Amash forum" to you is making a post stating FACTS about what he said. I'm sorry your tiny fragile ego can't take it when someone criticizes Senator Paul for something. Maybe you should take a break from the forums if little things like this get you so worked up. Bake some cookies and look at butterflies or something. Rand Paul isn't God. He makes mistakes like normal humans do and when he does, its okay to criticize him.

Are you autistic? I was not even having a discussion with you and you are not even posting in the same threads that I am, yet you went on neg rep burn cursing and saying I am a Communist racist. Your rep comments are not even relevant to any of the posts I have been making and how the hell am I a communist or racist for not liking Colbert?

If anyone needs to take a break it is the guy that just gave out 30+ reps for the purpose of giving me 3 hate filled profane negative reps back to back for what reason I do not even know. Communist racist? What the hell is that?

There is only one other forum member I know that pulls that unfounded childish crap like that with the race card. Hmmm, did you forget which account you logged into moron?

 

[erowe1]

From all of the pundits and politicians on TV saying that we (aka US taxpayers) need to spend massive money to help them and also bring more refugees to the US.

Why, were you planning on buying them a plane ticket back if they don't join your church?

No. But I don't support taxpayer funded welfare either, for them or for people already here.

 

[moostraks]

How in any way is that a question like "have you stopped beating your wife"? How ridiculous.

Every Christian can tell you, based on their belief in the Bible, that American Indian paganism is wrong. You don't believe it's wrong because you aren't a Christian.

You ask questions solely to play as if you are an authority on whom He will say ultimately lived the Faith, and you make them an absurd litmus test to which you answer for me when I find the question itself ridiculous and unanswerable because the judgement and righteous knowledge is His.

You have yet to grasp what I believe but, yet again, feel as though you may answer for me and then pass judgement on what you presume me to have as my Faith.

So have you stopped beating your wife, yes or no, it is a simple question you continue to ignore therefore you must be still beating her.

 

[erowe1]

The question isn't whether you will exercise your freedom to put up potential enemies of the church or not, the question is whether you think it is permissible to compel the rest of us to put up with them being involved in our political practice or openly practicing idolatry in our midst.

Of course I don't. And that's not the question. Nobody is proposing a law to compel you to do that. I'm certainly not.

I don't know where you even got the idea, unless it's just a way to paint some caricature so that you can support immigration laws that violate peoples' property rights.

 

[Sola_Fide]

You ask questions solely to play as if you are an authority on whom He will say ultimately lived the Faith, and you make them an absurd litmus test to which you answer for me when I find the question itself ridiculous and unanswerable because the judgement and righteous knowledge is His.

You have yet to grasp what I believe but, yet again, feel as though you may answer for me and then pass judgement on what you presume me to have as my Faith.

So have you stopped beating your wife, yes or no, it is a simple question you continue to ignore therefore you must be still beating her.

"Moostraks won't answer, so I will. Paganism is evil."

-Ponca Cheif White Eagle

 

[Sola_Fide]

The question isn't whether you will exercise your freedom to put up potential enemies of the church or not, the question is whether you think it is permissible to compel the rest of us to put up with them being involved in our political practice or openly practicing idolatry in our midst. If somebody else volunteers to let these people in, they volunteer for the rest of us to deal with the consequences without.

The enemies of the church are our government, our culture, the vast majority of our people, etc. You make it seem as if the United States government is "on our side".