They allow signs right on the grounds here .
Trump just handed Hillary the Presidency
- Thread starter Anti Federalist
- Start date
They allow signs right on the grounds here .
Actually, I have written about it before, years ago. I believe trying to explain why Rand would never be a superstar/president, and why ron never really was.
It takes a hell of a lot more work to make the masses flock to a guy like Ron Paul because of his record and ideology than it does to get them to flock to President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,939
^This. But you're fighting a lost cause trying to convince a Trumpskiite of the truth. It's easier to dupe someone than it is to convince that person that he/she has been duped. Nobody wants to admit they've been duped.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,493
In Commiefornia, we had our rich, celebrity, successful, "alpha male" as Governor. He was no girly man, but he did turn into RINO man. A tool for the big spending, mommy-state, globalist socialists and communists.
It's pretty much what I would expect from Trump, as I stated over a year ago:
It's pretty much what I would expect from Trump, as I stated over a year ago:
been duped. Because we don't agree, therefore we must be suckers.
Arnold was nothing like Trump. Arnold in no way threatened the establishment. He didn't have to show the backbone trump has. Their media fawned all over him. You are grasping for straws.
Last edited:
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,939
Disagreeing with opinion is one thing. Disagreeing with irrefutable fact is another.
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,939
Here is the irrefutable fact that Trumpskiites are still trying to deny. Hillary was afraid of losing to Rand. She was not afraid of losing to Trump. It's irrefutable because this is information taken from a leaked email from Hillary. Anyone at this point who says Rand would have had a harder time or even an equally hard time defeating Hillary as Trump is having just cannot be taken seriously. Why would Hillary rather have faced Trump than Rand? 1) Trump has even worse negatives than Hillary. 2) Hillary has more dirt on Trump. (Don't think that Hillary didn't know about the "grab em by the pussy" tape during the GOP primary.) 3) Rand has broader appeal outside the GOP base. Point #3 is really the biggest one. Angry as hell GOP voters gravitated to Trump because he best reflected how they were feeling. Trump was right when he said he could say anything and win the GOP nomination. That's because he basically won it when he talked about "rapists and murderers coming from Mexico." It will take more than that to win the general.
Don't need to read it, already know it is irrefutable.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,493
One side says Trump will be Jesus, the other side says he will be Hitler.
No possible way he could be somewhere in the middle, like a lukewarm RINO who ends up essentially being status quo.
If he wins we'll find out, but don't hold your breath.
Are you telling me, you really can't see Trump is different?
I mean, he has dominated these forums.
I didn't even know or care this section was here. I only posted in US News, foreign Affairs and economics. this section usually has the most, people and nobody even talks about Hillary. I will reveal in a week or so something about this post.
Across the internet, it's love or hate trump, just like these forums. Nobody talks up Clinton, so while trump gets love or hate, clinton, if mentioned, only gets hate. (see that? His score is -1 + 1 = 0 Hillary's score is -1 + 0 = -1, trump wins, 0 to -1) Its an argument about trump. He upturned the elections, he upturned the system. He demolished the press, by simply letting them reveal themselves for the demons they are. He let them talk about him, and never let them dominate the conversation when he was around. Until the very end, he was defiant to the press, even their final question was one last attempt to see if they could make him genuflect, and agree to their terms, before the deal was set. He is a businessman, and who the hell would agree to a contract before seeing it? He will wait until he sees the election results. Next day, he doubled down, a big middle finger to the press. He'll accept them, if he wins. He knew that would drive the press into a frenzy. He is way better at winning than anyone they ever met.
And I am afraid of operatives lurking here, to say why he used that strategy, but it was brilliant, and I love watching the press run around with their heads cut off, trying to stop him, but not knowing how. He knows these fools. He knows they are petty ideologues with too much ambition and not enough brains. He knows they are vampires, trying to suck his fame. trying to live on the stories of others, instead of making their own. A bunch of useless jackals, to be run around in circles.
He ignores the press now. But not to hide from it, like hillary, but to go to the people directly,and let them know who he is, as a person. He speaks to 100,000 people a day in rallies. he is campaigning the old fashioned way. And he points out to the crowds how the press is manipulating everything. He talks about camera angles, he talks about how they won't even mention the rally. He is exposing these presstitutes for what they are.
lukewarm? No no no. RINO? of course. He hijacked the GOP before the GOP could figure out what happened. He has no ideology, he is a populist.
Alex Jones and Barbara Walters, only two he gave an interview to. Says tons to me.
He knows what is up. He knows he has to win to do anything about it, and he will. One way or the other.
Honestly, I think, if it looks like the elections are actually stolen, he will refuse the results. And when they try to arrest him for sedition or whatever, the people will rise up, and the whole system will simply collapse. By that I mean, they'll find out nobody is following their orders. He is not going to stop, until he is where he needs to be, to help the United States.
I have a good vision, of how he bloodlessly, refuses the results, and still becomes president. I can see it, and how he'll do it. It will be nonviolent, and the whole world will drop their jaw in wonder. The world will stand still, and it will be a whole new way of ascending to the throne, so to speak, in a way that has only been done one other time in history.
I hope they don't rig the elections. For their sake.
And now my vision is complete. I have seen it full circle. Do not be surprised if he indeed gets hillary put in jail, and then exposed for what she is, and then the masses will demand her execution.
Gaddafi shall have his revenge.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,493
Agree.
I'd wager the primary outcome would be exactly the same if Trump never uttered those words. More like despite those kinds of words. He would have been more popular if he hadn't been an ass. The voters did gravitate to issues like stopping massive immigration, putting American jobs first, his anti-establishment tone, "stupid wars" and his attacks on the mainstream media and especially debate inquisitors (aka moderators). Those were real issues a plurality if not a majority wanted addressed.
Edit: Was Trump just telling the people what they wanted to hear? Most likely. I would never trust him.
Last edited:
Danke
Top Rated Influencer
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2007
- Messages
- 44,263
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,646
Wish I could find this...
Old Hustler cartoon with Carter and Brzezinski laughing hysterically in the oval office.
Caption:
"I'm gonna pardon Ford for pardoning Nixon!!!"
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 51,939
All I see about Hillary in ^that link is this:
Mena, Arkansas, 1982-?
According to former CIA operative Terry Reed (and other sources), cocaine was flown into Mena airport by "Enterprise" pilots coming in from Honduras and El Salvador (on some occasions, from Panama direct). The drugs were then offloaded, then loaded onto smaller aircraft for further distribution within the U.S. Almost all of these smaller airplanes, normally twin engine aircraft, were stolen from private airports and repainted with N numbers registered to similar type aircraft belonging to innocent owners.
According to Reed (author of "Compromised: Clinton, Bush and the CIA") and other sources, payoff money to Arkansas government officials was flown at night in what were called "green flights" and dropped in duffle bags on property owned by an associate of governor Bill Clinton. The money was then picked up and transported to Little Rock, where, according to Reed, it was laundered through the Rose Law Firm and ADFA (Arkansas Development Finance Authority). If Reed is correct, this sheds new light on what records Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster may have shredded in the "all night shredding session" at the Rose Law Firm. Reed goes into detail regarding the money laundering structure of Arkansas at the time.
Okay. She was involved in the cocaine traffic. But that's not a tie into to her calling for the Waco attack. I agree she's not to be trusted.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,646
I'll have to see if I can dig it up, keeping in mind this happened over 20 years ago now, but I recall reading somewhere that Bill had handed the whole mess to Hill and that her and Janet Reno were in constant contact throughout, with orders from the WH coming through her, Hillary that is.
liveandletlive
Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,164
Trump loves Hillary and identifies as a "Democrat"
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 63,493
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 117,646
Ah, yes, here it is...I had forgotten the Foster link, and this was mentioned in Rules of Engagement as well.
Tripp said this back in 2001
http://showcase.netins.net/web/rene... Waco Slaughter And Clinton Abused Monica.htm
Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vince Foster to resolve the 1993 Waco standoff in a move that led to the deaths of more than 80 men, women and children, former White House aide Linda Tripp charged in an interview Friday night.
Tripp also alleged that Monica Lewinsky was more of a victim of Bill Clinton's sexual predations than the former White House intern has publicly acknowledged.
Appearing on CNN's "Larry King Live," Tripp suggested that Foster, at Mrs. Clinton's direction, transmitted the order to move on the Branch Davidian's Waco compound, which culminated in a military-style tear gas attack on the wooden structure.
The compound burst into flames hours later as federal troops used a U.S. Army tank to ram the building and insert flammable gas.
Tripp described Foster's demeanor as "dignified, decent, caring, smart" during his early days at the White House. But when Waco happened, she said, "that's when I first knew that Vince was falling apart."
Foster was found shot to death in a Virginia park three months later.
Tripp said she was with the former deputy White House counsel when the news of the Waco assault broke on television.
"A special bulletin came on showing the atrocity at Waco and the children. And his face, his whole body slumped, and his face turned white, and he was absolutely crushed knowing - knowing the part he had played."
"And he had played the part at Mrs. Clinton's direction," charged Tripp.
Tripp was stunned by the contrast between Foster's heartfelt emotion at the Waco tragedy and what she observed from Mrs. Clinton.
"Her reaction, on the other hand, was heartless," Tripp told King, adding, "I can only tell you what I saw."
(We Came, We Saw, He Died amirite? - AF)
When asked how the decision to move on Waco was transmitted, Tripp said, "Foster, Mrs. Clinton, [deputy Attorney General] Webb Hubbell, [Attorney General] Janet Reno."
Tripp's new charge corroborates allegations first leveled in the 1999 documentary on the deadly confrontation, "Waco: A New Revelation."
In the film, director Michael McNulty included the account of former House Waco investigator T. March Bell.
"One of the interesting things that happens in an investigation is that you get anonymous phone calls," Bell explains in the film.
"And we in fact received anonymous phone calls from Justice Department managers and attorneys who believe that pressure was placed on Janet Reno by Webb Hubbell, pressure that came from the first lady of the United States."
At the film's premiere, Bell told NewsMax.com that phone logs obtained by House investigators indicated that Mrs. Clinton, Foster and Hubbell worked on Waco together.
"Those phone logs were Webb Hubbell's phone logs. There were calls from the first lady and Vince Foster to Webb Hubbell's office" during the Waco crisis, he said.
Bell said Mrs. Clinton grew more and more impatient as the Waco standoff came to dominate the headlines during the early months of the Clinton administration. It was she, Bell's source claims, who pressured a reluctant Janet Reno to act.
Reno, on the other hand, was not enthusiastic about launching the assault, said Bell. "Give me a reason not to do this," she is said to have begged aides.
Similar threads
