Trump Insider: Judge Andrew Napolitano is Trump's First Choice for Supreme Court

Ok, dumbshit. The country is dying. More than that, it is almost dead.

That's right, and the problem is that the government is too large: it spends too much and over regulates our economic and personal lives.

So...how could it be a solution to elect a guy who intends to grow government at all levels?

The trade deals in place now are horrible and they are getting ready to pass yet another, the TPP/TPA that will strip what's left of our national sovereignty. Our borders have been overrun by illegal aliens; people we are being forced to give free education, healthcare and for many, welfare. Some states are giving them driver's licenses and I can only assume, they will be voting in elections. The elite are one step away from ushering us into world government.

More trade and immigration restrictions would be economically harmful and further erode civil liberties. Regardless, though, whether you understand that or not (I know do you do not), surely you'd agree that these issues are trivial compared to things like the Fed, the debt, the police-state, etc (on all of which Trump is horrible)? But the point is moot anyway, as Trump has zero intention of further restricting immigration or renegotiating any trade deals; he's conning you.

So, kiss my ass, dumbass, I am supporting Trump.

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard." --H. L. Mencken
 
I want to ask people on RPF straight up a fantasy scenario.

Trump comes out and says elect me and I will give you Rand Paul as VP and Ron Paul as secretary of state and Napolitano as a judge on the supreme.....would you still not vote for him out of a purity ideological principle ?

Trump is hostile to libertarianism, at every level, and would pursue radically unlibertarian policies. So, if he asked Rand, Ron, or any other libertarian to be part of his administration, I'd have to assume that he was expecting them to abandon their principles (which, if they accepted the offer, I'd have to assume they did).

So, no, I wouldn't vote for that ticket.
 
Roder Stone called Ron Paul his "greatest hero" on Jones last week.

Do you believe any word out of the mouth of a political "fixer"?

Donald Trump was threatening to run third party if Ron Paul won the nomination, and was telling us all that Ron Paul was a loon.
 
All you so called "liberty" types who feel that Trump is your choice because you don't want Billary consider this... How many of us are there?? How many on this board?? How many coast to coast?? Do you really think you voting for the Trumpster will put him over the top?? All of us together won't amount to 1% and if you think he's winning or losing by 1% you need your head examined. I'm predicting that (either way) this presidential election will have a 7% or more spread. I'm further predicting that the winner is.... Billary!! I'm not voting for them (they are a package) but that's the way it's going down because over 70% of the voters now either work for the goonerment or collects bennies from the goonerment and that, my friend, is the bottom line...

Keep dreaming that your "vote" for Trump will make ANY difference in the outcome...

The sad truth is that even someone like Rand with the history, credibility and family name behind him trying to play a bit to the mob to get their vote, the purists on our side like Tom Woods, Lew Rockwell, Stefan Molyneux and even some of this forum etc etc go apeshit and accuse him of being cahoot with the establishment. There is very little hope when you think about it.
 
Last edited:
I know that, I was just mocking the reflexive willful ignorance on display in this neighborhood recently.

Oh, please do preach to us some more about willful ignorance. We're all agog to hear it.

And this thread is rated 5 star, lolol. Trumpsters are funny.

Their very first correct prognostication ever and you're giving them grief about it. See how you are?
 
Back
Top