Trump Insider: Judge Andrew Napolitano is Trump's First Choice for Supreme Court

[goldenequity]

[Trump advisor] Roger Stone said that Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano
is "probably Trump's number one pick for the U.S. Supreme Court.

The article is meant as a hit piece... (aka 'Napolitano.. a 911 truther.. etc. etc.)
media matters: http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/03/01/trump-ally-fox-judge-and-911-truther-andrew-nap/208928
The hitpiece was written by a former staffer for Al Franken.
Read the article.
It's short.
What a BIZARRE world we live in. **shakes head**

 

[jbauer]

If this had a prayer in happening we'd have to vote trump wouldn't we?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

[Trump advisor] Roger Stone said that...

Every word out of Roger Stone's mouth is like a turd falling into my drink.

 

[thoughtomator]

That alone would be more than we've gotten out of the establishment in 70 years of trying to work with them.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

That alone would be more than we've gotten out of the establishment in 70 years of trying to work with them.

So, despite the fact that Trump takes radically unconstitutional stances on every issue, and Napolitano is a strict constructionist, this somehow makes sense to you?

 

[goldenequity]

Every word out of Roger Stone's mouth is like a turd falling into my drink.

If it's ice cold... ya won't even taste it.

 

[Libertas Aut Mortis]

Bullshit. In the debate Trump gave two other names, and neither of them was Napalitano.

 

[phill4paul]

So, despite the fact that Trump takes radically unconstitutional stances on every issue, and Napolitano is a strict constructionist, this somehow makes sense to you?

Oh, look, Trumps a Liberty candidate!

 

[AuH20]

Trump may have a relationship with Napolitano via O'Reilly. I wouldn't be surprised at all.

 

[thoughtomator]

So, despite the fact that Trump takes radically unconstitutional stances on every issue, and Napolitano is a strict constructionist, this somehow makes sense to you?

Doesn't even have to make sense, nope. At all. I mean, fuck it, why should I care for the status quo? I would much rather let loose an elephant in that china shop and let him break things to his heart's content. What skin have I in keeping the game going when it'll be much more fun to see it busted up?

 

[thoughtomator]

Trump may have a relationship with Napolitano via O'Reilly. I wouldn't be surprised at all.

inconceivable! Doesn't make sense! Can't Compute! Bzzzzt111!11!11oenelevennnN!

 

[AuH20]

inconceivable! Doesn't make sense! Can't Compute! Bzzzzt111!11!11oenelevennnN!

That's where Judge Nap really broke out as a celebrity.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Trump may have a relationship with Napolitano via O'Reilly. I wouldn't be surprised at all.

I 100% guarantee you that Napolitano thinks O'Reilly is the sniveling, lying, propagandizing sack of shit that he is; as does every sane person on the planet.

...i.e. don't think the fact that sociopath Trump is buddy-buddy with sociopath O'Reilly would be the source of any friendly relationship between Trump and Napolitano.

 

[Libertas Aut Mortis]

I would much rather let loose an elephant in that china shop and let him break things to his heart's content. What skin have I in keeping the game going when it'll be much more fun to see it busted up?

The skin you have...or should have...is 2020.

Are you prepared to create a GOP which is completely hostile to Liberty? Because that is what you get if you let this elephant in the China Shop. You can kiss the GOP goodbye foreever, just like the Democrats....and where does that leave us? Huh?

Is bland Rand gonna win hearts and souls? How about pudgy Massie? "Al-Quadas Best Friend" Amash?

Get real dude. We are on the ropes.

 

[thoughtomator]

That's where Judge Nap started.

I know that, I was just mocking the reflexive willful ignorance on display in this neighborhood recently.

 

[erowe1]

That alone would be more than we've gotten out of the establishment in 70 years of trying to work with them.

I agree. But I don't believe it.

 

[thoughtomator]

The skin you have...or should have...is 2020.

Are you prepared to create a GOP which is completely hostile to Liberty? Because that is what you get if you let this elephant in the China Shop. You can kiss the GOP goodbye foreever, just like the Democrats....and where does that leave us? Huh?

Is bland Rand gonna win hearts and souls? How about pudgy Massie? "Al-Quadas Best Friend" Amash?

Get real dude. We are on the ropes.

OK, this is where I become convinced that your firsthand experience attempting to work within the system is zero.

The GOP is already completely, implacably hostile to liberty. They could not have made it clearer. That is an empty threat because that is just the status quo.

 

[AuH20]

I know that, I was just mocking the reflexive willful ignorance on display in this neighborhood recently.

Like it's some elaborate hoax to get the minuscule Libertarian outsiders to support Trump. Honestly, such a ploy would be a waste of resources. Our strength is our steadfastness, but if you try to herd us, you'll have a better chance with cats.

 

[goldenequity]

The new GOP theme song
is 'I can't feel my face when I'm with you...'
ALL TOGETHER: "AND I LOVE IT! AND I LOVE IT!"
(repeat)

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Doesn't even have to make sense, nope. At all. I mean, fuck it...

So you're a nihilist..

The outcome doesn't matter..

Okay, I can dig it, but then why not just vote for Hillary?

What's the difference, if nothing matters?

why should I care for the status quo?

Trump is the status quo, you muppet.