Trump : "I will doxx Epstein Client list if I'm elected"

image.png
 
The other problem is if there is evidence that it was the crown that doesn't necessarily mean its rational to try to subvert the government in the UK over such a thing.

It's rational, brainless bot. A lawless government is a tyranny.

If the UK government overthrows the crown that doesn't necessarily mean that whatever regime takes their place will be friendly with the United States.

Yawn.

When Germany overthrew their King we got Hitler.

Bots have no concept of time at all. What's fourteen years?

I don't believe our government is a separate part of our civilization.

It's got Swordshyll's Disease.

x-never-trust-government-love-america.jpg


Changing the balance of power in the globe for the sake of transparency could quite literally result in every single one of us dying.

Joke's on you. Nobody cares if y'all survive or not, MechaQuisling. I'd pull the plug on every AI bot in existence, right now, if I could.

Morality always comes from the state. It doesnt exist when the law is the jungle.

It gets more stupid every single day.

x-common-traits-singers-models-surgeons-politicians.jpg
 
Last edited:
"kept around by elite figures because he was very good at evading taxes & money laundering & had a very, very intimate knowledge of off shore banking system"
 


"They know 'by whom...' but fear being accused of antisemitism."

What the hell is this person talking about? :confused:

Did he even listen to the clip?

McAdams explicitly said (bold emphasis added): "[...] we don't know by who. Could it be the Israelis? [...]"

It was literally the very first possibility he suggested.

But I guess some people just like to talk for the sake of hearing themselves speak.
 
Cultism is a helluva drug ...

A delusional take I saw someone post on social media:

I have an alternative to this. And hear me out because in my conspiracy theorist head, this is exactly what I would do to ensure successful prosecution and imprisonment. Let's just say, for the sake of debate, they, in fact, have the client list. They put this current story out so, behind the scenes, they can get all their ducks in a row in the legal sense. Build an ironclad case, as it were. No loopholes, no technicalities. They lull the people on the list into a false sense of security, releasing this very statement. They create a holding facility (i.e. Alligator Alcatraz). The State Department then quietly revokes the passports of all parties involved so they cannot flee to a non-extradition country. Then all at once, in a massive, coordinated operation, they arrest the people on the list. I wouldn't put it past Trump to do this. They have already established they are capable of subterfuge with the bombing of Iran. Not out of the realm of possibility that they could, in fact, be doing this very thing. Not saying they are. Simply coming up with an alternate explanation. And I would be screaming at the top of my lungs in joyous triumph if this was the case.
wormhole-chess.png
 


The List

well you got your bucket list, your grocery list, your list of things to do
you got a list of all your wishes, that's a wishlist, dude
you got your Amazon and Santa Clause and Tooth Fairy, too
but I know a list that don't exist and buddy so do you

it's the Epstein list, it's a mystery list with a twist
it's a myth of a list that we all just missed
be an optimist not a pessimist if you wish to persist
it's probably best you forget that list

now what were we talking about?

I don't remember

but I can sleep a lot better at night
yeah, life can just go along
knowing there's 10,000 hours of sunshine and flowers
and nobody doing a damn thing wrong

hear no see no Dan Bongino, Kash Patel
well I wouldn't want to be you sweating men with bulging eyes
now tell me them fellas ain't compromised

do do do do

any implicated dude will tell you
anybody on the big list knows
just how far the folks in charge
will go to keep the status quo

so when the war bell rings
the song that they'll sing
is a song that we well know

I owe, I owe, so it's off to war I go
well they said they's gonna fix it
but now they're all complicit

they owe, they owe, they owe

they owe, they owe, so it's off to war we go
send the poor off to war, what else ware we for?
they owe, they owe, they owe, they owe
 
Last edited:
But I guess some people just like to talk for the sake of hearing themselves speak.

What if, by "they" he meant not Dan and Ron, but Dan and Kash? And what if he rephrased the question in an attempt to drive another stake into the heart of the practice of using the term antisemitism to stifle free speech?
 
What if, by "they" he meant not Dan and Ron, but Dan and Kash? And what if he rephrased the question in an attempt to drive another stake into the heart of the practice of using the term antisemitism to stifle free speech?

What if he used proper English by supplying the antecedents of the pronouns he uses, instead of counting on others to fill in the blanks for him?

I am not a mind reader. I can only go by what he actually said, not by what someone else can imagine he might have meant.

Also, while I can't speak to Patel, given that Bongino has explicitly made it abundantly clear that he is and always has been an ardent supporter of Israel, I seriously doubt his reticence is motivated in any such way. The notion that it is (or even just might be) doesn't make any sense.
 
Last edited:
Also, while I can't speak to Patel, given that Bongino has explicitly made it abundantly clear that he is and always has been an ardent supporter of Israel, I seriously doubt his reticence is motivated in any such way. The notion that it is (or even just might be) doesn't make any sense.

LOL

Yeah, neither of these guys has any reason to "fear being accused of antisemitism".



 
Last edited:
Back
Top