Trump deploying military

[devil21]

Anyone who wants to defend freedom can and should do it locally, county if needed. I am not interested in Growing the Fed, as you and your president are working feverishly to do.

Put it this way: if Trump $pent like the dickens and rolled out the same policies that he is doing now, with the badge of D displayed on his lapel, would you be for, or against him?

The secret is that SS is a D. The CFR's lackeys are actually communists who portray being anti-communist while pushing for policies that are required under communist societies.

 

[PAF]

The secret is that SS is a D. The CFR's lackeys are actually communists who portray being anti-communist while pushing for policies that are required under communist societies.

I actually thought that, since he is a disciple of the prez. But like the prez, does party even matter at that level in government? Perhaps he is a lobbyist of the corporatist sort, since he stays clear of threads containing "follow the money".

Me wonders ;-)

 

[Swordsmyth]

The secret is that SS is a D. The CFR's lackeys are actually communists who portray being anti-communist while pushing for policies that are required under communist societies.

Projection.

 

[Swordsmyth]

I actually thought that, since he is a disciple of the prez. But like the prez, does party even matter at that level in government? Perhaps he is a lobbyist of the corporatist sort, since he stays clear of threads containing "follow the money".

Me wonders ;-)

I wonder if you are AntiFa.

 

[PAF]

I wonder if you are AntiFa.

LOL yeah, an Antifa Agorist

 

[Swordsmyth]

Anyone who wants to defend freedom can and should do it locally, county if needed. I am not interested in Growing the Fed, as you and your president are working feverishly to do.

Put it this way: if Trump $pent like the dickens and rolled out the same policies that he is doing now, with the badge of D displayed on his lapel, would you be for, or against him?

It is not growing the federal government to use the military in a manner envisioned by the Founding Fathers to protect against a nationwide insurrection intended to impose communism.

The Insurrection Act was passed in 1807 for just such an emergency where the local government couldn't or wouldn't deal with the problem.

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Trump is not sending in the military yet.

But if the governors allow this to get farther out of hand and do not defend the rights of their citizens then it will become an insurrection and Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act.

Here's another idea. Trump can declare that he will pardon anyone who is prosecuted by the state for legitimately defending their lives or property from looters, vandals, arsonists, criminals, etc.

 

[PAF]

It is not growing the federal government to use the military in a manner envisioned by the Founding Fathers to protect against a nationwide insurrection intended to impose communism.

The Insurrection Act was passed in 1807 for just such an emergency where the local government couldn't or wouldn't deal with the problem.

The founding fathers, Anti-Federalists, were not heeded, so no.

I don't need or want any "help me save me" from fed.gov or the president. They mucked everything up so far to the point there is no turning back. See the first sentence of this post, again.

 

[devil21]

I actually thought that, since he is a disciple of the prez. But like the prez, does party even matter at that level in government? Perhaps he is a lobbyist of the corporatist sort, since he stays clear of threads containing "follow the money".

Me wonders ;-)

It's pretty obvious after a while that he uses most of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals right here on RPF. Pushes for leftist policies of big government, central authority, never comments on anything that is already in place as planks of the Communist Manifesto. Nothing to say about taxation, spending, central bank, etc. Why? Because, as a communist himself, he's a-ok with all of that. The only remaining pieces are the usual genocide that takes place and he's clearly pushing for that, the secreting of Congress (never has a bad word to say about Congressional actions unless they're Donald-centric) in the path of becoming a central politboro, and the abolition of republican government ideals in favor of authoritarian rule. Collectivizes, projects, ad hominem, etc. All straight out of Alinsky's Rules. It's really quite obvious after a while.

 

[vita3]

Reality is that MN National Guard saves Minneapolis.

So I have no problem using state’s Guard to protect citizen’s & business

I do have a problem with anyone making excuses for destruction & theft

 

[devil21]

Reality is that MN National Guard saves Minneapolis.

So I have no problem using state’s Guard to protect citizen’s & business

I do have a problem with anyone making excuses for destruction & theft

Are we still talking about looters or the government? Is there any difference these days? I'm sorry but I don't get too spun up about some Nikes being jacked while Congress doles out $2T to cronies. They want us to focus on some stolen Nikes instead of the ongoing looting of the Treasury trust fund.

 

[vita3]

I hear what you saying about treasury.. that’s undeniable, but weeks old

Tonight American cities are under siege

Looting, fires & destruction way out of control

We are@ war imo

 

[fcreature]

Here's another idea. Trump can declare that he will pardon anyone who is prosecuted by the state for legitimately defending their lives or property from looters, vandals, arsonists, criminals, etc.

Wouldn't these typically qualify as state crimes?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Wouldn't these typically qualify as state crimes?

You are correct. Wouldn't work. Shame. Would be free and easy.

 

[69360]

Deployed military in DC. Threatening Governors that he'll unconstitutionally send US military to states.

So my good Libertarian friends, anyone still support this $#@!?

I believe in DC it is allowed by the constitution.

In the 50 states if he invokes the insurrection act he can deploy the military.

This is getting close to insurrection.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Libertarian is lower case. First lesson.

Secondly libertarians support protecting individual rights. Using the military would be a blunt weapon to preserve liberty but there is nothing unlibertarian about using troops to stop looting.

EM.


In the politicaly correct world we live in, loot is almost universally frowned upon... even when it's for a 'good cause'.

TAKE THE OIL

This is also becoming a global story:

[h=3]China blasts Trump over his response to US unrest[/h]

 

[Origanalist]

It's pretty obvious after a while that he uses most of Alinsky's Rules for Radicals right here on RPF. Pushes for leftist policies of big government, central authority, never comments on anything that is already in place as planks of the Communist Manifesto. Nothing to say about taxation, spending, central bank, etc. Why? Because, as a communist himself, he's a-ok with all of that. The only remaining pieces are the usual genocide that takes place and he's clearly pushing for that, the secreting of Congress (never has a bad word to say about Congressional actions unless they're Donald-centric) in the path of becoming a central politboro, and the abolition of republican government ideals in favor of authoritarian rule. Collectivizes, projects, ad hominem, etc. All straight out of Alinsky's Rules. It's really quite obvious after a while.

It's been obvious ever since he got here.

 

[Origanalist]

I hear what you saying about treasury.. that’s undeniable, but weeks old

Tonight American cities are under siege

Looting, fires & destruction way out of control

We are@ war imo

It's only out of control because it's allowed to be out of control. Police are ordered to stand down and let it happen. (there are no good cops)

 

[CCTelander]

The founding fathers, Anti-Federalists, were not heeded, so no.

I don't need or want any "help me save me" from fed.gov or the president. They mucked everything up so far to the point there is no turning back. See the first sentence of this post, again.

There are videos all over this board showing free individuals taking up the challenge and providing a near perfect solution to the problems of looting and mayhem. In spite of that we have our old pal SS once again calling for a centralized, authoritarian response from Trump and the feds. He claims to want to reduce the power and intrusiveness of the fedgov, yet never seems to miss a chance to demand that they flex some muscle. Tends to render those claims of a desire for reduction of fed power a bit insincere.

 

[vita3]

There are plenty of good cops. But you are right about stand down directives.

Pure insanity