trump, cruz, hillary, bern, trump, cruz, hillary, bern, trump, cruz, hillary, bern... why?

[presence]

Ron Paul says we should be talking about third party candidates.

why then 2016 election subforum at RPF all talking about socialist authoritarian fucks?

why no subforum to put those statist bootlickers in?

why you people keep bumping crumphillabern bullshit?

why you never bump mcpeterjohn?

why 2016 Presidential election never talking about nuances of liberty policy differences between Petersen, Johnson, and McAfee?

why not more concerned with which is more liberty loving rather than which is more liberty destroying?

why rpf, why?

 

[Jamesiv1]

Ron Paul says we should be talking about third party candidates.

why then 2016 election subforum at RPF all talking about socialist authoritarian $#@!s?

why no subforum to put those statist bootlickers in?

why you people keep bumping crumphillabern bull$#@!?

why you never bump mcpeterjohn?

why 2016 Presidential election never talking about nuances of liberty policy differences between Petersen, Johnson, and McAfee?

why not more concerned with which is more liberty loving rather than which is more liberty destroying?

why rpf, why?

because TV

because videogames

because Morton Downey, Jr

because Geraldo Rivera

because Jerry Springer

because Survivor

because Honey Boo Boo

because.

 

[Wooden Indian]

I like Austin the best, personally. He most closely mirrors my belief system followed closely by McAfee, then Johnson. As far as getting the most positive attention to a 3rd party alternative... this is where things get complicated for me.

Johnson is a poor speaker that doesn't make his points very well and would get turned into hamburger by someone like Trump or Killary- but he does have the resume as Governor and the name recognition.

McAfee can speak well, has the name recognition, and debates passionately, but comes with a shit-ton of baggage, and doesn't look presidential at all.

Peterson is well spoken, charming, and sharp, but doesn't have the life experience to be taken seriously at this point. While he does speak in soundbites, so does 99% of all politicians and boobus eats it up, so I don't consider that a real negative though he could tone it down and get more specific for my liking.

Truth is none have a snowball's chance at the prize but this is the long game we have to consider. So, who can poll the highest?
I'm torn between Johnson and McAfee on that. And if it McAfee, do we have to worry about the message of Liberty being overshadowed by his... shall we say colorful past?