Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
They can only do that if the labor market is manipulated.They would rather cut your wages or raise prices.
They can only do that if the labor market is manipulated.They would rather cut your wages or raise prices.
That's the wrong question.Maybe the government can pay them enough to have a "livable wage"? Or should they get paid as little as the employer can get away with and still hire enough workers?
They can only do that if the labor market is manipulated.
If people are willing to work for that wage, how is the labor market manipulated?
Because excessive low skilled immigrants are allowed to come here in spite of the costs to the community at large.
No.Shouldn't an employer be allowed to hire whomever he wants to? Even if they come from another country?
No.
The number of immigrants allowed should be controlled to preserve the liberty of the citizens.
There is more to it all as well, we have had an excessive low skill labor pool subsidized domestically for multiple generations.
And the rest of the world is not the same as the US, even if we were to merge into a global economy it would have to take place slowly and in a controlled fashion, you can't just add an unlimited number of low skilled workers all at once without breaking the system, you would need to do it slowly over generations so that the economy could adapt and create more jobs for them all.
Internally we should have free markets, externally we must protect our citizens from foreign threats.So you don't like free markets but favor government interference.
Of course we will have to raise prices to pay for those higher wages. How much are you willing to pick vegetables for?
The guy that raised $20 million for the wall should offer to pay bus tickets. He raised $20 million. Bus ticket from El Paso to San Fran, District 12, $150 bucks. That's $15 million to ship every released detainee to Pelosi's District. For THIS month. With $5 million left over to ship the next wave to New York District 12. I'll kick in $150 for that wave.
Maybe the government can pay them enough to have a "livable wage"? Or should they get paid as little as the employer can get away with and still hire enough workers?
Might be cheaper to put them on a train.
So you don't like free markets but favor government interference.
I'm sure a bulk discount could be made.
Shouldn't an employer be allowed to hire whomever he wants to? Even if they come from another country?
And an infrastructure investment + tax credits to address the growing need.![]()
How about Govt does its fucking job and not let every illegal into the country to compete for the bottom of the barrel shit jobs? Maybe that gives the workers some leverage when negotiating wages with employers, thus allowing them to both agree on what the employee gets paid instead of Slavery? Its called Free Market, which does NOT have Slavery.
The Govt solution to any problem is far too often worse than the original problem itself.
Was talking GoFundME. Not a government expenditure.
It would be a mistake. Why wouldn't you want to milk this cow? Uncle Sam is always looking to increase the budget. As a good citizen you should always help the state to waste money. Look at the disparity of income between the blue and red states.![]()