Trump Campaign literature leaves out Paul

[P3ter_Griffin]

I'm not sure where Paul should be in these charts.... but I'm assuming he should be there! Please post relevant Rand data if you have it.

eta: link to Trump campaign tweet: https://twitter.com/DanScavino/status/631592921272320000

 

[jkr]

of course, hes the anti-paul

its why he is there

 

[CPUd]

This is the poll, it is Iowa only, so far looks accurate:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/politics/cnn-orc-poll-iowa-republican-caucus-data/index.html

In those categories, I see Rand at 4-6%, tied with a lot of others.

 

[CPUd]

Here's one he left out:

 

[P3ter_Griffin]

This is the poll, it is Iowa only, so far looks accurate:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/12/politics/cnn-orc-poll-iowa-republican-caucus-data/index.html

In those categories, I see Rand at 4-6%, tied with a lot of others.

Thank you.

Look at this beauty: (rp2) (on deciding who to support in the caucus)

def decided : 15%

Leaning: 19%

Undecided : 66%

 

[P3ter_Griffin]

Here's one he left out:

I gotta agree with you. Seems like a pretty legit literature piece. At least its broken down well to be able to learn from it... but I know there is a thread in the Rand forums for that sort of discussion so mods can delete/close this if they want.