Trilateral Commission alarmed that Dr. Paul is causing “significant future damage.”

@libertarian4321: What, you still believe there's a difference between the two political parties? I didn't think there were any of you guys left!

OK snark aside, to really SEE what's happening in this world one needs to drop the False Dichotomy Blinders. The fascists have infested both parties. They "own" the Republicans AND the Democrats. They "own" both Capitalism and Communism. False opposites, all, and getting us to struggle against false opposites is a nifty way for them to get us to bleed our energy dry.

By trying to sound like you're "in the know", you completely circumvented his point. Are many people within both parties ideologically identical? Sure. However, Ron hasn't dropped out of the race despite complaints from (some) fellow Republicans. Why would a man within the Democratic party convince him to drop out? Essentially it'll be a stranger from a different party that is going to be the man to get him to drop out? You'd think that an organization that controls all events would use someone closer to and on friendly terms with the Congressman to get him to drop out. Apparently not though. Only a fool would think the strategy would work and only a fool would believe the story.
 
Does anyone wonder how a reporter gets inside a TC meeting to report on it and does so repeatedly? This wreaks of fiction.
 
A quote from the article:

They expressed concern that Paul’s rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting “their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker.

Yet another reason this march on washington is crucial!! Ron Paul is talking publicly about our rally to high-powered groups.

It's time to get on board with this folks!
 
I do take the article with somewhat a dose of salt but as far as Foley goes it might not mean that Foley would personally influence Ron to quit the crusade but that he was in charge of making it happen. This could have many variables as I'm sure a former House speaker has his means and connections with certain, shall we say, sway.

I don't think it'll do any good as I would imagine there's been many higher ups in DC that have tried to get him to drop out and chill out but that ain't gonna happen.
 
@ Clay Trainor

Fulford can get interviews with Rockefeller types because he IS (adjusting my tinfoil hat) "Illuminati." His grandfather was reportedly offed for doing something the Rockefeller types didn't like, something to do with Tesla technologies.

So Ben Fulford is himself an insider, he may be a part of the whole globalist charade for all we know, Good Cop vs. Bad Cop and all that. Then again this might be a true blue(blood) grudge match against the people who killed Grampa. Who knows? Fulford himself seems genuinely well-meaning. God knows there are factions within the elites and they DON'T get along.

It's all just speculation and I hope do someone makes a movie about this when it's all over. "There will be ninjas!"

As for the American Free Press article, the author IS a member of the elite and for all we know he's "exposing" the Trilaterals in accordance with (their) direction. Meaning I have no doubts as to the authenticity of the article but concede some of it might be psyops.
 
Does anyone wonder how a reporter gets inside a TC meeting to report on it and does so repeatedly? This wreaks of fiction.

I don't believe that the article ever says he got inside.

Jim Tucker has been trailing the Bilderbergers and TC for decades. Tucker's tactic is to go to the location of the event. He has acquaintances as well as employees working at the event that are able to get inside who slip him information.

In short, his info is not first hand, but comes from sources that he trusts. . . .
 
Trying to lure us into a false sense of effectiveness?

or wishful thinking on the part of the author. I think he gets his giggles hoaxing us. "On site reporting" is the part that makes me think he claims to have been there. If he knows people there, why don't they kick his ass for talking when he shows up? Maybe the TC did meet, but I find it highly suspect that this guy knows what they talked about. Sometimes you guys just believe what you want to. If you saw this on CNN, you wouldn't believe it.... but because it comes from "the underground" and says what you want to hear, you're all about it.

newsflash... I was at the TC meeting as a staffer, and they were debating deli tray or fruit spread for their Summer Jubilee. It got heated, and Henry Kissinger called David Gergen a big forheaded clinton sucker. Ted Koppel just shook his head, and wrote down deli tray. I think that's how they left it. I dunno, I was sent out early to get fudge sickles for Janet Reno.
 
or wishful thinking on the part of the author. I think he gets his giggles hoaxing us. "On site reporting" is the part that makes me think he claims to have been there. If he knows people there, why don't they kick his ass for talking when he shows up? Maybe the TC did meet, but I find it highly suspect that this guy knows what they talked about. Sometimes you guys just believe what you want to. If you saw this on CNN, you wouldn't believe it.... but because it comes from "the underground" and says what you want to hear, you're all about it.

newsflash... I was at the TC meeting as a staffer, and they were debating deli tray or fruit spread for their Summer Jubilee. It got heated, and Henry Kissinger called David Gergen a big forheaded clinton sucker. Ted Koppel just shook his head, and wrote down deli tray. I think that's how they left it. I dunno, I was sent out early to get fudge sickles for Janet Reno.


Cute. :rolleyes: You obviously didn't take the time to check out James Tucker:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_P._Tucker,_Jr. most of us who have been at this for several years believe he's a trustworthy source.
 
What you can't scrounge up even one grain of salt?

i have lots of salt. I don't know what you mean though. dirt about wiki? plenty. mud about that guy? I don't know who he is. I just know he claims to be a super insider, which doesn't seem likely. if only you guys know who he is, there's no value, only risk, in slipping him info... because no one will read it and no outlets will pick it up. Sorry, he's full of shit. He's got 30 years of work... he should have made several dozen accurate predictions by now. maybe you can sell me on him.
 
I just read the wiki about him that you linked. It just tells a couple anecdotes. He could have made those up too. He shows up to a hotel that he THINKS is bilderberg in 1999, and a member of his crew THINKS he recognizes someone important? That doesn't sound like a bilderberg meeting to me. It sounds like a conference that he thought was bilderberg. BBC 4 was with AJ too for that gay ass bohemian grove thing. That was probably staged so AJ could make a name for himself and start his false opposition. There was no one important at that bohemian thing either.... at least on video.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top