Trilateral Commission alarmed that Dr. Paul is causing “significant future damage.”

9/11/1990

A Speech by George H. W. Bush, President of the U.S.A., on the new world order. Given to a joint session of the United States Congress, Washington D.C. on 11 September 1990.

"The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge...

We're now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."

UN Founders: Collectivists with no regard for our US Constitution
 
I don't understand why this supposedly powerful evil Trilateral Commission would be so concerned about Ron Paul?

His chances of winning are slim, even as I ask around the loyal Paulites. This movement is hardly new as there are tons of movements with similar or identical messages. The future of the movement after the dust is settled and November 08 passes is unclear as we are so many different voices....

I question this source that says this

You are mistaken, the establishment has much to fear from an educated populace hell bent on the idea of taking back their individual liberty. TC plans to dissolve U.S. sovereignty are no secret and they run completely against what Ron Paul is all about. Winning the nomination is not the central issue here, it is the fact that we are going forward with a very bold move in taking over the GOP machine. You must not have been in the movement long if you still believe that we are weak and ineffective, either that or you believe everything you hear from the media. The future of the freedom movement looks better than ever!
 
I don't mean to take your comments out of context, but do you mean to say that the Trilateral Commission is not composed of elite members of society who set agendas for government and media?

I just put it in quotation marks because it's a definition I don't really use. I'm sure they write things like that in newspaper articles - like something saying: Congressman Paul's supporters agree with him on his foreign policy, which he says follows the "Just-war Theory of Christianity". Something like that, or just getting the exact phrase that was used by the person they're quoting.

Now that you've parsed the second half of my sentence, how about the first part? :cool:

I think Paul's philosophy aligns more with Kennedy than Lincoln, by the way - and they were both assassinated, so it makes for a better analogy. ;)
 
A Speech by George H. W. Bush, President of the U.S.A., on the new world order. Given to a joint session of the United States Congress, Washington D.C. on 11 September 1990.

"The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge...

We're now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders."

UN Founders: Collectivists with no regard for our US Constitution

Wow. Got a link for that one?
 
They should be petrified. It's not only young people at Ron Paul rallies getting educated, but those young people, and other people of various ages and varying degrees of political education, are going out and spreading the message of liberty en masse. This is only the beginning...

Plus, add on the future politicians Paul is inspiring who might have otherwise lived a life of empathy.
 
You are mistaken, the establishment has much to fear from an educated populace hell bent on the idea of taking back their individual liberty.

The populace is still very much ignorant and cannot be judged otherwise if people vote because one guy's tie is sexier then another's. True, we have attracted many young people, but if a movement consists of puttin a Ron Paul sticker on a car or making yet another youtube video of one of Ron Paul's speeches over some dramatic music, the movement is worthless. Young people didn't vote and still do not, if Ron Paul's election numbers are any indication, and as far as old people, well they probably still think Osama is hiding behind their TV or something....:rolleyes:

TC plans to dissolve U.S. sovereignty are no secret and they run completely against what Ron Paul is all about. Winning the nomination is not the central issue here.....

Herein lies the core of our disagreement

, it is the fact that we are going forward with a very bold move in taking over the GOP machine. You must not have been in the movement long if you still believe that we are weak and ineffective, either that or you believe everything you hear from the media. The future of the freedom movement looks better than ever!

My view of a movement has nothing to do with either TV, or length of my Ron Paul grassroots' membership. I have eyes, I see ignorance, indifference and resistance, sometimes violent one, to the truth and freedom.

I hope I'm wrong, I want to be wrong. I believe that it takes believing in the candidate. I believe that it takes work. Look at the threads I made

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=124804

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=120205

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=113563

and tell me I'm being negative. I want this to work. I want the movement to last....
 
The populace is still very much ignorant and cannot be judged otherwise if people vote because one guy's tie is sexier then another's. True, we have attracted many young people, but if a movement consists of puttin a Ron Paul sticker on a car or making yet another youtube video of one of Ron Paul's speeches over some dramatic music, the movement is worthless. Young people didn't vote and still do not, if Ron Paul's election numbers are any indication, and as far as old people, well they probably still think Osama is hiding behind their TV or something....:rolleyes:



Herein lies the core of our disagreement



My view of a movement has nothing to do with either TV, or length of my Ron Paul grassroots' membership. I have eyes, I see ignorance, indifference and resistance, sometimes violent one, to the truth and freedom.

I hope I'm wrong, I want to be wrong. I believe that it takes believing in the candidate. I believe that it takes work. Look at the threads I made

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=124804

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=120205

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=113563

and tell me I'm being negative. I want this to work. I want the movement to last....

Just finished watching Ron Paul's speech at UNC Chapel Hill, there is a part in there where he points out that it doesn't take a majority to effect change. It only takes 5 percent to lead the change and we have 10 percent! I agree that we have created something which can effect great change regardless of the outcome of the primaries.-
 
Last edited:
We have enough numbers to take over many county and state organizations... if our people stay focused; tune out the media; work together and keep getting better informed.
 
Trilateral Commission alarmed that Dr. Paul is causing “significant future damage.”

The Trilateral Commission—one of the three most powerful globalist groups in the world—held closed-door meetings right here in Washington, D.C. from April 25 to 28. True to form, those members of the media who knew about the meeting—or were themselves participants in the proceedings—refused to discuss what went on inside or report on the attendees. Luckily, AFP’s own editor, Jim Tucker, was on the scene to bust this clandestine confabulation wide open.

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/global_elite_gather_135.html

Source: American Free Press - Jim Tucker

Luminaries at the Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington expressed confidence that they own all three major presidential candidates, who, despite political posturing, will support sovereignty-surrendering measures such as NAFTA and the “North American Union.”

“John has always supported free trade, even while campaigning before union leaders,” said one. “Hil and Barack are pretending to be unhappy about some things, but that’s merely political posturing. They’re solidly in support.”

He was referring to Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

Mrs. Clinton, they noted, held strategy sessions as first lady on how to get Congress to approve NAFTA “without changes.” As president, they agreed, she would do no more than “dot an i or cross a t.”

Candidate Obama has not denied news reports in Canada that his top economic adviser, Austan Goolsbee, assured Canadian diplomats that the senator would keep NAFTA intact and his anti-trade talk is just “campaign rhetoric.”

PETRIFIED ABOUT PAUL

While they are confident they can deal with any “potential president,” the Trilateralists paid huge tribute to Ron Paul in an equally large twist of irony, by expressing alarm that he is causing “significant future damage.”
They expressed concern that Paul’s rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting “their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker.

The reasons Paul’s “education campaign” strikes fear into Trilateral hearts are obvious. Paul would refuse to surrender an ounce of U.S. sovereignty to an international organization and TC wants world government.

Paul would immediately bring U.S. troops home from Iraq, Afghanistan and from 130 UN “peacekeeping” missions around the globe. TC wants to enjoy war profiteering and global power. Paul would abolish the federal income tax while the TC wants to pile on a global tax payable to the UN.

The formal agenda was loaded with everything Paul and American patriots detest: higher taxes, more foreign giveaways, more immigration, both legal and illegal, into the United States and “engaging Iran,” among others.
AMERICA NEEDS TO PAY HER FAIR SHARE?

The Trilaterals got down to real work on Saturday, April 26, with a high-powered panel called “U.S. Foreign and Domestic Policy: Broad Outlines for a New Administration.”

It was presided over by journalistic pimp David Gergen, who will write nothing about TC in his magazine, U.S News and World Report. Also participating were Kenneth Duberstein, former White House chief of staff for President Ronald Reagan; Strobe Talbot, president of the Brookings Institution and former deputy secretary of state; and Joseph Nye, former assistant secretary of defense. Henry Kissinger, former secretary of state and long-time Bilderberg leader, was present and listed as a participant. But a TC staff member crossed his name out. Some speculated he had throat problems.

This panel had these orders for the next president: increase foreign aid across the board because “America does not pay its fair share,” pay up the arrears in UN dues, allow as many immigrants into the United States as want to come and provide “amnesty” for illegal aliens already here.

Little, if anything, was said about the fact that American taxpayers pay one-fourth of the UN’s operating costs and one-third of the cost of 130 “peacekeeping missions” or the fact that immigrants from South America depress wages here and the average immigrant family costs the government thousands of dollars a year in welfare, health and other “benefits.”

Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank and another long-time Bilderberg boy, largely echoed these views in a sweetheart “interview” by another journalistic strumpet, Lionel Barber, editor of The Financial Times, who will obediently report nothing.

FIGHT WARMING; ALLOW IMMIGRANTS

There were “subgroup” meetings on “climate change,” “water and sanitation” and “migration and development.” Every nation, especially the U.S., should spend big bucks to fight “global warming,” they agreed. The United States should spend more “because Americans cause the most pollution,” one argued. Americans should send more money to Africa so natives can drink clean water and scrub themselves, they said.

Antonio Garrigues Walker, chairman of Garrigues Abogadas y Asesores Tributarios, joined Peter Sutherland, the UN secretary-general’s “special representative on migration and development,” to call on the United States to not only allow unlimited immigration, but to throw more money at Mexico and other impoverished Latin countries. It was, somehow, their “right” to have more U.S. dollars. Sutherland is chairman of British Petroleum and Goldman Sachs International. He is also a long-time Bilderberg leader.

MEDIA BLACKOUT

Bill Emmott, another kept journalist, spoke on “the rise of Asia” at a reception-dinner held at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. Emmott, former editor of The Economist, will report nothing.

Sunday morning, Robert Blackwill, former U.S. deputy national security adviser for Iraq, led a panel discussion on “engaging Iran and building peace in the Persian Gulf Region.” For the first time, there was dissent. Blackwill tried to rationalize the invasion of Iraq. Others doubted that Saddam Hussein was connected to the 9-11 terrorist attacks or was a nuclear threat. Blackwill said the military option remains but he hopes diplomatic efforts succeed.

Other participants were Ray Takeyh of the Council on Foreign Relations, which functions as the propaganda ministry for TC and Bilderberg; Volker Perthes, head of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and Hitoshi Tanaka, former Japanese deputy minister of Foreign Affairs.

MORE, MORE, MORE MONEY

More foreigners demanded more U.S. money at a lunch panel called “European and Asian views on U.S. Foreign and Security Policy.” Participants were Elisabeth Guigou, a member of the French National Assembly and former minister for European affairs and Han Sung-joo, former minister of foreign affairs for South Korea.

An afternoon session addressed “global health” with more calls for American tax dollars. A major voice in this cause came from Sylvia Mathews Burwell, president of Global Development Programs, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates has attended at least one Bilderberg meeting.

EXCUSES FOR IRAQ; PLANS FOR IRAN

John Negroponte, U.S. deputy secretary of state, addressed the evening dinner on “U.S. foreign policy perspectives.” Again, the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were rationalized and an invasion of Iran held out as a possibility.

The Monday morning finale addressed the Global Financial Crisis involving these luminaries: Robert Kimmitt, U.S. deputy secretary of the treasury; Martin Feldstein, former chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers; David Rubenstein, managing director of The Carlyle Group; Naoki Tanaka, president of the Center for International Public Policy Studies and Sir Andrew Crockett, president of JP Morgan Chase International.

Among them, there was much talk of the U.S. government’s “duty” to “intervene” on behalf of “financial institutions under stress.” Little or nothing was said of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who are losing their homes because financial institutions lured them into buying houses they could not afford.

Throughout the weekend, no American voices were heard objecting to the demands on their country. Instead, there were smiles, nods and applause.
 
Last edited:
and yet the People continue to live in their bumble. Luckily more of us are seeing reality. What is the count up to? 1,000,000+ ?
 
That article made me think that maybe the best thing for the Ron Paul rEVOLution would be Ron Paul not becoming POTUS, but travelling the country continuing the "education campaign". Could grassroots keep enough money coming in to support a four year campaign for 2012? Imagine Ron Paul holding a rally every other week at a large college or conference hall FOR FOUR YEARS. It would be alot to ask from Dr. Paul, but maybe even a steady stream of weekly youtube videos from Washington or Texas would serve the purpose.

I sincerely hope Ron Paul gets a chance to read this article before Thomas Foley gets a chance to work on his assignment. This to me was the most impressive and scary part of that article:

"They expressed concern that Paul’s rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting “their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker."
 
i have alot of ignorant people in my life...and even when i try to talk to them they just dont get it...its really depressing and frustrating i just want to scream " why dont u just get it?!?!?!?!" but i dont want to scare them away
 
That article made me think that maybe the best thing for the Ron Paul rEVOLution would be Ron Paul not becoming POTUS, but travelling the country continuing the "education campaign". Could grassroots keep enough money coming in to support a four year campaign for 2012? Imagine Ron Paul holding a rally every other week at a large college or conference hall FOR FOUR YEARS. It would be alot to ask from Dr. Paul, but maybe even a steady stream of weekly youtube videos from Washington or Texas would serve the purpose.

I sincerely hope Ron Paul gets a chance to read this article before Thomas Foley gets a chance to work on his assignment. This to me was the most impressive and scary part of that article:

"They expressed concern that Paul’s rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting “their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker."

I like this idea, and I don't think it is any more to ask of Paul than what he'd have to do if he WERE elected President.
 
"They expressed concern that Paul’s rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting “their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker."


that scared me becuase what would they do if he said screw u im not stopping anything!

i wish he could become POTUS now but the thought of a 4 year campaign awakening millions of americans would be great! but if he doesnt make it to become POTUS im scared to think of what will happen the next four years
 
Back
Top