Trevor Lyman emailed RP supporters fake delegate map

[LibertyEagle]

Uh, I surely hope someone has at least tried to contact Trevor about this and let him know about the problems with the map. That seems only fair and probably more appropriate than accusing him of "confusing RP supporters", as that implies intent.

 

[WilliamC]

Took me a minute to remember Trevor Lymans name and past contributions, if I was a bit rude I apologize.

Too many reports of false delegate lists and such over the weekend got me twitchy.

 

[Magicman]

Agreed. I dont think airing out the laundry is the way to go. Think before you act. Jeremy if you do stuff like this and make this personal you shouldn't be a moderator and are abusing it.

 

[Jeremy]

Agreed. I dont think airing out the laundry is the way to go. Think before you act. Jeremy if you do stuff like this and make this personal you shouldn't be a moderator and are abusing it.

Yeah I got your absurd/angry PMs about your opinion on the matter. I didn't call Trevor a liar like some others did. But he's certainly confusing people about delegates by emailing this fake map to his list. It's not a projection map, it claims Paul won these states already.

 

[Galileo Galilei]

there is nothing wrong with projecting winners based upon local caucus results.

 

[Magicman]

Jeremy, I'm absurb? Look at what your doing and how stupid your reaction is. You are trying to make someone look really bad and you certainly didn't try to fix the situation you made it a lot worse by being a prick. This can be easily rectified by fixing the problem and speaking to him and offering a retraction, why do it your way it doesn't solve anything.

 

[airborne373]

Trevor Lyman! Yikes! What grand post has Trevor elected himself to this time.

 

[Jeremy]

Jeremy, I'm absurb? Look at what your doing and how stupid your reaction is. You are trying to make someone look really bad and you certainly didn't try to fix the situation you made it a lot worse by being a prick.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...ge-Guidelines-and-Other-Important-Information

Treatment of Others: Site members are expected to use the following standards in the treatment of others:

+ Be respectful of others users.
+ No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users.
+ No posting of anyone's personal contact information.
+ Ad hominem attacks on any individual or groups is strongly discouraged, use proper names.

 

[KMX]

How can something like this get 3 pages? But other more important things go ignored?

 

[Jeremy]

How can something like this get 3 pages? But other more important things go ignored?

Controversial things get more posts and a few people decided to turn this into a controversy. (see above)

 

[Magicman]

Jeremy you are PERSONALLY attacking Trevor Lyman and you just quoted yourself on how absurb you really are, I'm treating you with the same respect your giving Trevor right now. You are making a thread about someone and trying to ruin their reputation. You are bringing this on yourself.

+ No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users.

 

[Jeremy]

Jeremy you are PERSONALLY attacking Trevor Lyman and you just quoted yourself on how absurb you really are, I'm treating you with the same respect your giving Trevor right now. You are making a thread about someone and trying to ruin their reputation. You are bringing this on yourself.

+ No insulting, antagonizing or personally attacking other users.

I'm not attacking anyone. I never insulted Trevor. You, however, are insulting me.

 

[phill4paul]

I noticed this making the rounds on FB the other day and had to research before 'sharing' it. Then I had to correct those that posted it. As much as I would like for these images to be true they simply do not represent the whole story. And, sure enough in all the 'shared' posts there were those that quickly corrected the OP. It does not do us a service to misrepresent the facts. It leads to less credibility.
Keep to the truth. The truth in and of itself is amazing and we are doing more every day. Onwards!

 

[Magicman]

I'm not attacking anyone. I never insulted Trevor. You, however, are insulting me.

Really? If you are not attacking Trevor then why are you making a PERSONAL topic with his name on it and your trying to destroy his reputation. I tried really hard to help the situation and RESPECT you but you mocked me don't pretend like your the victim with your passive aggressive attitude.

 

[WilliamC]

Hey now, I was the one that actually did more of a personal attack, but T.L. is not a participant in this exchange so don't confuse attacking him and attacking your interlocutor, it's not the same thing.

Attack me instead, I really don't care

 

[LibertyEagle]

Jeremy, the title of the thread is accusatory. Has anyone notified Trevor of the problem and given him the opportunity to retract it?

 

[Jeremy]

Really? If you are not attacking Trevor then why are you making a PERSONAL topic with his name on it and your trying to destroy his reputation. I tried really hard to help the situation and RESPECT you but you mocked me don't pretend like your the victim with your passive aggressive attitude.

If another organization sent out the map then the title would be "Organization X sending out false map." This one was from Trevor though. Did you want me to censor the source of the false information?

 

[Canderson]

What date should I be looking for Iowa to be filled in on the official map? Louisiana? Washington?

 

[Magicman]

I'm not gonna lower myself to this garbage I'm done with this conversation. I spoke my mind and that's it.

 

[Jeremy]

What date should I be looking for Iowa to be filled in on the official map? Louisiana? Washington?

Iowa Convention: June 16th
Louisiana Convention: June 2nd
Washington Convention: June 2nd