Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Toxic femininity
- Thread starter Origanalist
- Start date
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
Former Who's The Boss star Alyssa Milano called for a "sex strike" on Friday to protest Georgia's new "heartbeat" bill that Gov. Brian Kemp recently signed into law - banning abortions in the state at six weeks into pregnancy.
Critics of the bill have argued that many women don't know they're pregnant in the first six weeks, which is roughly when a heartbeat can be detected.
In response, the feminist former actress turned activist tweeted: "Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy," adding "JOIN ME by not having sex until we get bodily autonomy back."
While feminists on Twitter supported Milano with #SexStrike and #Lystistrata2019 hashtags, Milano was widely mocked on both sides of the aisle.
Conservative director and producer Robby Starbuck pointed out in a Tweet that Milano's campaign means that "Democrats get no sex, get even grumpier and more unhinged," while "Republicans keep having sex" and "get to laugh." Moreover "Less babies get murdered as long as they keep this up."
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...-sex-strike-protest-pro-life-bill-gets-mocked
Critics of the bill have argued that many women don't know they're pregnant in the first six weeks, which is roughly when a heartbeat can be detected.
In response, the feminist former actress turned activist tweeted: "Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy," adding "JOIN ME by not having sex until we get bodily autonomy back."
Our reproductive rights are being erased.
Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy.
JOIN ME by not having sex until we get bodily autonomy back.
I’m calling for a #SexStrike. Pass it on. pic.twitter.com/uOgN4FKwpg
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) May 11, 2019
As Fox News' Joseph Wulfsohn notes, "The idea is far from new. In ancient Greece, the playwright Aristophanes wrote "Lysistrata," in which the title character persuades other women to deny their husbands of sex until they end a war. More recently, director Spike Lee's 2015 film, "Chi-Raq," transferred the same idea to modern-day Chicago and gang violence." Until women have legal control over our own bodies we just cannot risk pregnancy.
JOIN ME by not having sex until we get bodily autonomy back.
I’m calling for a #SexStrike. Pass it on. pic.twitter.com/uOgN4FKwpg
— Alyssa Milano (@Alyssa_Milano) May 11, 2019
While feminists on Twitter supported Milano with #SexStrike and #Lystistrata2019 hashtags, Milano was widely mocked on both sides of the aisle.
Conservative director and producer Robby Starbuck pointed out in a Tweet that Milano's campaign means that "Democrats get no sex, get even grumpier and more unhinged," while "Republicans keep having sex" and "get to laugh." Moreover "Less babies get murdered as long as they keep this up."
This is the funniest thing I’ve seen all year you guys. Does Alyssa Milano understand her plan means:
• Democrats get no sex, get even grumpier and more unhinged
• Republicans keep having sex
• Republicans get to laugh
• Less babies get murdered as long as they keep this up pic.twitter.com/8g9U28sYDc
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) May 11, 2019
Starbucks' sentiments were echoed as others mocked Milano. • Democrats get no sex, get even grumpier and more unhinged
• Republicans keep having sex
• Republicans get to laugh
• Less babies get murdered as long as they keep this up pic.twitter.com/8g9U28sYDc
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) May 11, 2019
A #SexStrike goes some way toward rediscovering traditional sexual morality.
Just don’t call it “continence” or “chastity,” lest the liberals wise up to the fact that they’re promoting what their enemies have been preaching for, oh, 3,000 years or so.
— Sohrab Ahmari (@SohrabAhmari) May 11, 2019
Just don’t call it “continence” or “chastity,” lest the liberals wise up to the fact that they’re promoting what their enemies have been preaching for, oh, 3,000 years or so.
— Sohrab Ahmari (@SohrabAhmari) May 11, 2019
tfw the libs own themselves so you don’t have to https://t.co/iJKA0XADi4
— Alexandra DeSanctis (@xan_desanctis) May 11, 2019
— Alexandra DeSanctis (@xan_desanctis) May 11, 2019
embracing chastity to own the social conservatives lmao
— Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) May 11, 2019
— Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) May 11, 2019
Feminists becoming Mike Pence to own the cons.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) May 11, 2019
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) May 11, 2019
Women who support the #SexStrike see sex as simply something they 'give' to men to gain something in return. They do not see sex as a mutual expression of love. In this case, they wish to exchange sex for abortion laws.
Logically, such women are no different than prostitutes.
— RAMZPAUL (@ramzpaul) May 11, 2019
Logically, such women are no different than prostitutes.
— RAMZPAUL (@ramzpaul) May 11, 2019
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...-sex-strike-protest-pro-life-bill-gets-mocked
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Good luck sweetcheeks.
That cooze is greatly overrated and causes the downfall of many good men.
Best thing men can do is avoid poisonous woemen like you.
MGTOW
Last edited:
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Police: New Jersey Woman Slit 5-Day-Old Baby’s Throat Because She ‘Didn’t Want Her’
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/polic...-old-babys-throat-because-she-didnt-want-her/
Police say that Hiralbahen Bhavsar admitted to them that she killed her baby when they arrived on the scene.
Published 1 day ago on May 11, 2019 By Shane Trejo
Hiralbahen Bhavsar, 29, of Little Ferry, New Jersey allegedly slashed her baby’s throat and arm last Thursday night. The baby died at only five-days-old because her mother “didn’t want her,” according to police reports.
Police responded to a complaint from Bhavsar after her husband went berserk and allegedly tried to kill her in response to what she had done to their infant daughter.
Bhavsar attempted to commit suicide while being questioned by police, which law enforcement impeded her from doing successfully. She is being observed at the Bergen New Bridge Medical Center.
She pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree murder.
Trending: Canada Moves to Ban Christians From Demonstrating in Public Under New Anti-Hate Proposal
Police were initially alerted to the incident after Bhavsar called the police complaining of chest pains before claiming that her husband was trying to kill her.
“She then stated that it was in fact her husband who was trying to kill her and that he was presently armed with a knife and in the living room of their apartment,” an affidavit written by law enforcement said.
According to the affidavit, police found her husband Jaymin Bhavsar in a rage and handcuffed him shortly after they arrived. Other family members were there and protested the police’s actions. That is when Hiralbahen Bhavsar owned up to what she had done to law enforcement.
Police wrote of the horrifying scene: “At this time, Hiralbahen exited a rear bedroom and began stating, ‘No, no not him. I did it. I killed my baby.'”
Mr. Bhavsar claimed that the baby started crying during dinner and that is when his wife snapped. She grabbed a knife, took the baby into a nearby bedroom, and committed the gruesome murder. He faces charges for his violent reaction to his wife’s behavior as well.
It is unknown whether she had a history of mental illness, her public defender Ilene McFarland said. The community is shocked by the news, which they say is not indicative of their quiet community of immigrants.
“It’s quiet, and all the families are friendly,” said 25-year-old Majd Alrawashdeh, 25, who has lived in the area for less than a year.
“I saw her walking around when she was pregnant,” Alrawashdeh said of Bhavsar. “I was shocked. I couldn’t sleep that night. [The baby] was only 5 days old.”
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/polic...-old-babys-throat-because-she-didnt-want-her/
Police say that Hiralbahen Bhavsar admitted to them that she killed her baby when they arrived on the scene.
Published 1 day ago on May 11, 2019 By Shane Trejo
Hiralbahen Bhavsar, 29, of Little Ferry, New Jersey allegedly slashed her baby’s throat and arm last Thursday night. The baby died at only five-days-old because her mother “didn’t want her,” according to police reports.
Police responded to a complaint from Bhavsar after her husband went berserk and allegedly tried to kill her in response to what she had done to their infant daughter.
Bhavsar attempted to commit suicide while being questioned by police, which law enforcement impeded her from doing successfully. She is being observed at the Bergen New Bridge Medical Center.
She pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree murder.
Trending: Canada Moves to Ban Christians From Demonstrating in Public Under New Anti-Hate Proposal
Police were initially alerted to the incident after Bhavsar called the police complaining of chest pains before claiming that her husband was trying to kill her.
“She then stated that it was in fact her husband who was trying to kill her and that he was presently armed with a knife and in the living room of their apartment,” an affidavit written by law enforcement said.
According to the affidavit, police found her husband Jaymin Bhavsar in a rage and handcuffed him shortly after they arrived. Other family members were there and protested the police’s actions. That is when Hiralbahen Bhavsar owned up to what she had done to law enforcement.
Police wrote of the horrifying scene: “At this time, Hiralbahen exited a rear bedroom and began stating, ‘No, no not him. I did it. I killed my baby.'”
Mr. Bhavsar claimed that the baby started crying during dinner and that is when his wife snapped. She grabbed a knife, took the baby into a nearby bedroom, and committed the gruesome murder. He faces charges for his violent reaction to his wife’s behavior as well.
It is unknown whether she had a history of mental illness, her public defender Ilene McFarland said. The community is shocked by the news, which they say is not indicative of their quiet community of immigrants.
“It’s quiet, and all the families are friendly,” said 25-year-old Majd Alrawashdeh, 25, who has lived in the area for less than a year.
“I saw her walking around when she was pregnant,” Alrawashdeh said of Bhavsar. “I was shocked. I couldn’t sleep that night. [The baby] was only 5 days old.”
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
Ah to be one of those poor, oppressed women who have fewer privileges than men.
A woman like Jazzmin Fry, who was so oppressed that when she stabbed a complete stranger — a man — with one of her stilettos for literally no reason, she only had to pay a $250 fine as punishment. Her conviction wasn’t even recorded outside of the press.
9News in Australia reported that the assault occurred after Fry, 21, had been out drinking with friends. She was in the China Town Mall in Brisbane’s Fortitude Valley, allegedly carrying her heels, according to her victim, when she just reached out and hit him on the top of his head with one.
The victim, Kyle Johns, 19, was taken to the hospital and needed two staples in his head to repair the wound.
"[She] comes to the middle of China Town with her heels in her hand and stabs me in the crown of my head," Johns told 9News.
His mother, Susan Johns, received a phone call at 2:29 a.m. the Sunday morning of the attack, she told the outlet.
"This voice I didn't know said, 'Are you Kyle's mum?', and I said, 'Yes', and he said, 'We've been assaulted — Kyle is laying on the ground in a pool of his own blood,’” she told the outlet.
Fry pleaded guilty to the assault and was simply charged $250 as punishment. 9News confronted her outside the office where she worked before the assault (she had since been fired).
Women in the justice system — whether in Australia, or the U.K., or the U.S. — get off much easier than men for the same crimes. One of the biggest disparities can be found in sexual assaults against minors. When women commit these crimes — whether against a young boy or girl, or teenager — they receive much lighter sentences than men do for the same crime.
As I have written previously, men who abuse children (rightly) receive harsh punishments. A 32-year-old man who sexually abused a young girl over the course of several years faced 366 years to life in prison. Yet a 25-year-old woman who pleaded guilty to raping young boys at a trailer park only received five years probation. Yes, one example comes from a person pleading guilty and the other taking their case to trial, but five years probation for an admitted child abuser? There’s no way a man would receive the same deal.
In 2012, University of Michigan professor Sonja Starr researched the gender disparities in federal criminal cases and found that “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do” and that “Women are … twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.”
More at: https://www.dailywire.com/news/47087/woman-privilege-woman-pays-just-250-fine-stabbing-ashe-schow
A woman like Jazzmin Fry, who was so oppressed that when she stabbed a complete stranger — a man — with one of her stilettos for literally no reason, she only had to pay a $250 fine as punishment. Her conviction wasn’t even recorded outside of the press.
9News in Australia reported that the assault occurred after Fry, 21, had been out drinking with friends. She was in the China Town Mall in Brisbane’s Fortitude Valley, allegedly carrying her heels, according to her victim, when she just reached out and hit him on the top of his head with one.
The victim, Kyle Johns, 19, was taken to the hospital and needed two staples in his head to repair the wound.
"[She] comes to the middle of China Town with her heels in her hand and stabs me in the crown of my head," Johns told 9News.
His mother, Susan Johns, received a phone call at 2:29 a.m. the Sunday morning of the attack, she told the outlet.
"This voice I didn't know said, 'Are you Kyle's mum?', and I said, 'Yes', and he said, 'We've been assaulted — Kyle is laying on the ground in a pool of his own blood,’” she told the outlet.
Fry pleaded guilty to the assault and was simply charged $250 as punishment. 9News confronted her outside the office where she worked before the assault (she had since been fired).
Women in the justice system — whether in Australia, or the U.K., or the U.S. — get off much easier than men for the same crimes. One of the biggest disparities can be found in sexual assaults against minors. When women commit these crimes — whether against a young boy or girl, or teenager — they receive much lighter sentences than men do for the same crime.
As I have written previously, men who abuse children (rightly) receive harsh punishments. A 32-year-old man who sexually abused a young girl over the course of several years faced 366 years to life in prison. Yet a 25-year-old woman who pleaded guilty to raping young boys at a trailer park only received five years probation. Yes, one example comes from a person pleading guilty and the other taking their case to trial, but five years probation for an admitted child abuser? There’s no way a man would receive the same deal.
In 2012, University of Michigan professor Sonja Starr researched the gender disparities in federal criminal cases and found that “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do” and that “Women are … twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.”
More at: https://www.dailywire.com/news/47087/woman-privilege-woman-pays-just-250-fine-stabbing-ashe-schow
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Some of that male privilege.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Infant Survives After Mother Allegedly Throws Her Down Ravine
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2019/05/11/infant-survives-mother-allegedly-throws-ravine/
WARNER TODD HUSTON 11 May 2019
A North Carolina infant miraculously survived when her mother threw her down a ravine and left her to die, according to police.
Initially, Asheville, North Carolina, resident Krista Madden reportedly told police she had been carjacked. When police found her in her car, she said the carjackers had taken her baby, Shaylie Madden.
Hours later, the infant was found alive lying at the bottom of a ravine adjacent to a road.
It was “by the grace of God” that the baby was found alive, said Henderson County Sheriff Lowell Griffin, according to Fox News.
The sheriff reported that a family found the infant in the ravine when they happened to hear the child’s plaintive cries.
A member of the family who found the child, Courtney Fowler, told Fox Carolina that she and her father discovered the missing child by chance when she saw a discarded car seat and then faintly heard the cries of a baby.
“He backed the car up, and at that point, I had saw the car seat. The car seat was down over the bank,” Fowler said. “I couldn’t see the baby, but I saw the car seat. He went down over the bank and got the car seat and the baby, and he brought it up the bank to me, then I held it and then my mom held it.”
The baby had been thrown free of the car seat but had only sustained bumps and bruises despite being tossed 75 feet down into the ravine.
Sheriff Griffin added that authorities do not believe the mother’s tale that two masked men stole her car and kidnapped her baby. “We don’t have any reason to believe it is based on anything” factual, Griffin told the media.
Madden is being held on a $750,000 bond as police investigate the incident.
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2019/05/11/infant-survives-mother-allegedly-throws-ravine/
WARNER TODD HUSTON 11 May 2019
A North Carolina infant miraculously survived when her mother threw her down a ravine and left her to die, according to police.
Initially, Asheville, North Carolina, resident Krista Madden reportedly told police she had been carjacked. When police found her in her car, she said the carjackers had taken her baby, Shaylie Madden.
Hours later, the infant was found alive lying at the bottom of a ravine adjacent to a road.
It was “by the grace of God” that the baby was found alive, said Henderson County Sheriff Lowell Griffin, according to Fox News.
The sheriff reported that a family found the infant in the ravine when they happened to hear the child’s plaintive cries.
A member of the family who found the child, Courtney Fowler, told Fox Carolina that she and her father discovered the missing child by chance when she saw a discarded car seat and then faintly heard the cries of a baby.
“He backed the car up, and at that point, I had saw the car seat. The car seat was down over the bank,” Fowler said. “I couldn’t see the baby, but I saw the car seat. He went down over the bank and got the car seat and the baby, and he brought it up the bank to me, then I held it and then my mom held it.”
The baby had been thrown free of the car seat but had only sustained bumps and bruises despite being tossed 75 feet down into the ravine.
Sheriff Griffin added that authorities do not believe the mother’s tale that two masked men stole her car and kidnapped her baby. “We don’t have any reason to believe it is based on anything” factual, Griffin told the media.
Madden is being held on a $750,000 bond as police investigate the incident.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Police arrest 'snarling woman' in Burger King and find seven syringes full of liquid in her vagina
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...Burger-King-seven-syringes-pulled-crotch.html
Jeymie Wescott could reportedly be heard yelling from the restaurant toilets
Cops said if she brought contraband to the jail she could face further charges
She did, and now faces extra charges that cost her an extra $5000 in bond fees
By LEIGH MCMANUS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 06:57 EDT, 13 May 2019 | UPDATED: 07:31 EDT, 13 May 2019
Cops in Florida called out to a Burger King after reports of a 'snarling woman' behaving erratically in the restaurant toilets later found seven syringes full of liquid in her vagina.
Jeymie Wescott, from St Petersburg, Florida could reportedly be heard yelling from the toilets of the Largo restaurant and then deputies went to check on her, performing a consented pat down and feeling something hard in her crotch area.
She allegedly swore when cops felt what they now know was the syringes.
They warned her that if she brought contraband back to the jail she could face further charges.
It was only later, back at the jail, that police knew what it was in the the 35-year-old's crotch.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...Burger-King-seven-syringes-pulled-crotch.html
Jeymie Wescott could reportedly be heard yelling from the restaurant toilets
Cops said if she brought contraband to the jail she could face further charges
She did, and now faces extra charges that cost her an extra $5000 in bond fees
By LEIGH MCMANUS FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 06:57 EDT, 13 May 2019 | UPDATED: 07:31 EDT, 13 May 2019
Cops in Florida called out to a Burger King after reports of a 'snarling woman' behaving erratically in the restaurant toilets later found seven syringes full of liquid in her vagina.
Jeymie Wescott, from St Petersburg, Florida could reportedly be heard yelling from the toilets of the Largo restaurant and then deputies went to check on her, performing a consented pat down and feeling something hard in her crotch area.
She allegedly swore when cops felt what they now know was the syringes.
They warned her that if she brought contraband back to the jail she could face further charges.
It was only later, back at the jail, that police knew what it was in the the 35-year-old's crotch.
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
[h=1]She Didn’t Get An ‘A’ So She Accused Professor Of Sexual Harassment. Then She Held Ex At Knifepoint To Destroy Evidence.[/h]https://www.dailywire.com/news/4717...m_content=051519-news&utm_campaign=modelnames
Anti Globalist
Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2017
- Messages
- 52,175
God all these stories are really fucked up. Is it ever going to end?
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,680
Pregnant Chicago Woman Lured by Baby Clothes Ad Murdered and Baby Ripped from Her Womb
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/201...aby-clothes-ad-murdered-baby-ripped-her-womb/
WARNER TODD HUSTON 16 May 2019
Chicago police say that a pregnant woman responding to an ad for baby clothes was brutally strangled to death and her unborn baby ripped from her womb.
Weeks after being reported missing, the Chicago Police Department (CPD) found the body of Marlen Ochoa-Uriostegui, 19, inside a trash can behind a Chicago home. Police also located the woman’s baby who had been forcibly removed from the victim’s womb, according to the Daly Mail.
Officials discovered the baby when a woman– who has not yet been publically named — reported having a baby that was born unresponsive. First responders arrived and were able to revive the child, but it is not expected to survive.
The pregnant teen was last seen at her high school in Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood on April 23.
Her family said the teen was last heard from as she was headed to a stranger’s home to pick up unwanted baby clothing and a stroller. Ochoa-Uriostegui reportedly met this woman on a Facebook group called “Help a Sister Out.”
Ochoa-Uriostegui left a note on the group’s page saying, “Hello ladies, I’m due May 10, and I still need a ton of things for my son.”
Police report that the 46-year-old woman who owns the home behind which the victim’s body was found called 911 weeks ago to report giving birth to a baby that was non-responsive.
A neighbor told police that she saw the 46-year-old suspect emerge from her house holding a bloody infant in a bed sheet. The neighbor said that the suspect told her she had a baby in distress. But the neighbor also noticed that the suspect had a bloody shirt and bloody hands but no blood on her shorts or legs.
“I said, ‘What’s up,’ and she said, ‘I just had the baby. It’s not breathing,'” the neighbor told the Chicago Sun-Times. “She said, ‘I stood up, and the baby came out.'”
Another neighbor reported that the suspect had recently begun saying she wanted to become a mother again and was acting strangely.
Giovanni Lopez, the father of the child who has been living with the victim for the last four years, told the press he was in a “lot of pain, a lot of anguish, a lot of sadness.”
The CPD took into custody for questioning a 46-year-old woman along with her boyfriend and her daughter.
“We believe all of them played some role in this unspeakable act of violence,” Chicago police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said at a press conference on Wednesday.
No official charges have been filed as the CPD investigates the case.
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/201...aby-clothes-ad-murdered-baby-ripped-her-womb/
WARNER TODD HUSTON 16 May 2019
Chicago police say that a pregnant woman responding to an ad for baby clothes was brutally strangled to death and her unborn baby ripped from her womb.
Weeks after being reported missing, the Chicago Police Department (CPD) found the body of Marlen Ochoa-Uriostegui, 19, inside a trash can behind a Chicago home. Police also located the woman’s baby who had been forcibly removed from the victim’s womb, according to the Daly Mail.
Officials discovered the baby when a woman– who has not yet been publically named — reported having a baby that was born unresponsive. First responders arrived and were able to revive the child, but it is not expected to survive.
The pregnant teen was last seen at her high school in Chicago’s Pilsen neighborhood on April 23.
Her family said the teen was last heard from as she was headed to a stranger’s home to pick up unwanted baby clothing and a stroller. Ochoa-Uriostegui reportedly met this woman on a Facebook group called “Help a Sister Out.”
Ochoa-Uriostegui left a note on the group’s page saying, “Hello ladies, I’m due May 10, and I still need a ton of things for my son.”
Police report that the 46-year-old woman who owns the home behind which the victim’s body was found called 911 weeks ago to report giving birth to a baby that was non-responsive.
A neighbor told police that she saw the 46-year-old suspect emerge from her house holding a bloody infant in a bed sheet. The neighbor said that the suspect told her she had a baby in distress. But the neighbor also noticed that the suspect had a bloody shirt and bloody hands but no blood on her shorts or legs.
“I said, ‘What’s up,’ and she said, ‘I just had the baby. It’s not breathing,'” the neighbor told the Chicago Sun-Times. “She said, ‘I stood up, and the baby came out.'”
Another neighbor reported that the suspect had recently begun saying she wanted to become a mother again and was acting strangely.
Giovanni Lopez, the father of the child who has been living with the victim for the last four years, told the press he was in a “lot of pain, a lot of anguish, a lot of sadness.”
The CPD took into custody for questioning a 46-year-old woman along with her boyfriend and her daughter.
“We believe all of them played some role in this unspeakable act of violence,” Chicago police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said at a press conference on Wednesday.
No official charges have been filed as the CPD investigates the case.
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
The Marine Corps has punished at least eight drill instructors amid allegations of hazing and abuse at a training center in Parris Island, South Carolina.Marine officials and documents obtained by The Washington Post say investigators found multiple incidents of female drill instructors abusing female recruits in the 4th Recruit Training Battalion.
The documents say investigations into the allegations were launched when the corps began considering more fully integrating male and female recruit training.
One instructor is accused of shoving a recruit and chipping her tooth, another is accused of forcing a recruit to wear "feces soiled underwear" on her head. The latter instructor denied that.
More at: https://news.yahoo.com/report-marine-corps-punished-instructors-over-hazing-claims-124345741.html
The documents say investigations into the allegations were launched when the corps began considering more fully integrating male and female recruit training.
One instructor is accused of shoving a recruit and chipping her tooth, another is accused of forcing a recruit to wear "feces soiled underwear" on her head. The latter instructor denied that.
More at: https://news.yahoo.com/report-marine-corps-punished-instructors-over-hazing-claims-124345741.html
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
dannno
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
- Messages
- 65,717
She showed up drunk...to dance...at a bar...lol
I don't really fault her too much for that.. I mean, apparently she fell on stage a couple times and her boss attributed that to being drunk, but come on.. I would have just been like, "Hey, why don't you go home and rest it off? Next time please try not to drink quite as much before coming in.."
The billiard ball thing was messed up tho, apparently one of them hit her in the head.
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
Feminist Sophie Lewis has written a new book in which she argues that in order to ‘dismantle capitalism’ it’s necessary to ‘abolish the family’.
Lewis was interview by left-wing website the Nation under the headline Want to Dismantle Capitalism? Abolish the Family.
According to the piece, patriarchy and capitalism combined to produce alienated workers who became “instruments of production” for the men who lorded over them.”
This led to the “heteronormativity of familial relations” and must be combated by a “radical reconceptualization of pregnancy itself”.
More at: https://www.infowars.com/feminist-says-family-must-be-abolished-to-dismantle-capitalism/
Lewis was interview by left-wing website the Nation under the headline Want to Dismantle Capitalism? Abolish the Family.
According to the piece, patriarchy and capitalism combined to produce alienated workers who became “instruments of production” for the men who lorded over them.”
This led to the “heteronormativity of familial relations” and must be combated by a “radical reconceptualization of pregnancy itself”.
More at: https://www.infowars.com/feminist-says-family-must-be-abolished-to-dismantle-capitalism/
Swordsmyth
Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 74,737
https://medium.com/s/can-we-talk/men-cause-100-of-unwanted-pregnancies-eb0e8288a7e5
As a mother of six and a Mormon, I have a good understanding of arguments surrounding abortion, religious and otherwise. When I hear men discussing women’s reproductive rights, I’m often left with the thought that they have zero interest in stopping abortion. If you want to prevent abortion, you need to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Men seem unable (or unwilling) to admit that they cause 100% of them.
I realize that’s a bold statement. You’re likely thinking, “Wait. It takes two to tango!” While I fully agree with you in the case of intentional pregnancies, I argue that all unwanted pregnancies are caused by the irresponsible ejaculations of men. All of them.
Don’t believe me?
Let’s start with this: A woman’s egg is only fertile for about two days each month. Yes, there are exceptions, because nature. But one egg which is fertile two days each month is the baseline. And those fertile eggs are produced for a limited number of years. This means, on average, women are fertile for about 24 days per year.
But men are fertile 365 days a year. In fact, if you’re a man who ejaculates multiple times a day, you could cause multiple pregnancies daily. In theory, a man could cause 1000+ unwanted pregnancies in just one year. While it’s true that sperm gets crappier as men age, it doesn’t have a fertility expiration date; men can cause unwanted pregnancies from puberty until death. So, starting with basic fertility stats and the calendar, it’s easy to see that men are the issue here.
As a society, we really don’t mind if women suffer, physically or mentally, as long as it makes things easier for men.“But what about birth control?” you might ask. “ If a woman can manage to figure out how to get an abortion, surely she can use birth control to avoid unwanted pregnancy, right?”
Great question. Modern birth control for women is possibly the most important invention of the last century, and I’m very grateful for it. It’s also brutal. The side effects for many women include migraines, mood swings, decreased libido, depression, severe cramps, heavy bleeding, aneurysm — and that’s just a small fraction of them.
Discouragingly, a promising study on a new male contraceptive was canceled in large part due to… (wait for it)… side effects. To be clear, this list of side effects was about one-third as long as the known side effects for commonly used women’s contraception. There’s a lot to unpack in that story alone. I’ll simply point out that, as a society, we really don’t mind if women suffer, physically or mentally, as long as it makes things easier for men.
But, men, I’ve got good news. Even with the horrible side effects, women are (amazingly!) very willing to use birth control. Unfortunately, it’s harder to get than it should be, but that doesn’t keep women from trying. Birth control options for women require a doctor’s appointment — sometimes multiple doctor’s appointments — and a prescription. They’re not always free, and often not cheap. Some are actually trying to make female birth control options more expensive by allowing insurance companies to refuse to cover them. In addition, contraceptive options for women can’t be easily acquired at the last minute. In most cases, they don’t work instantly.
The pill requires consistent daily use and doesn’t leave much room for mistakes, forgetfulness, or unexpected disruptions to daily schedules. Again, the side effects can be brutal — and not just in rare cases. Despite the hassle and side effects, I’m still grateful for birth control. (Please don’t take it away.)But it’s critical to understand that women’s birth control isn’t simple or easy.
In contrast, let’s look at birth control for men — i.e., condoms. They’re readily available at all hours, inexpensive, convenient, and don’t require a prescription. They’re effective and work on demand, instantly. They don’t cause aneurysms, mood swings, or debilitating cramps. Men can keep them stocked up just in case, so they’re always prepared. They can be easily used at the last minute. I mean, condoms are magic! So much easier than birth control options for women.
As a bonus, most women are totally on board with condoms. They keep us from getting STDs. They don’t lessen our pleasure during sex or prevent us from climaxing. The best part? Cleanup is so much easier — no waddling to the toilet as jizz drips down our legs.
So why would there ever be unwanted pregnancies? Why don’t men just use condoms every time they have sex? Seems so simple, right?
Oh. I remember. Men don’t love condoms. In fact, it’s very, very common for men to pressure women to have sex without a condom. It’s also not unheard of for men to remove the condom during sex without the women’s permission or knowledge. (Pro tip: That’s assault.)
Why would men want to have sex without a condom? Because, for the precious minutes when they’re penetrating their partner, not wearing a condom gives them more pleasure. So… that would mean some men are willing to risk getting a woman pregnant — which means literally risking her life, her health, her social status, her relationships, and her career — so they can experience a few minutes of slightly increased pleasure. Is this for real?
Yes. Yes, it is.
Let me emphasize that again: Men regularly choose to put women at massive risk in order to experience a few minutes of slightly increased pleasure.
For the truly condom-averse, men also have a non-condom, always-ready birth control option built right in: the pull-out. It doesn’t protect against STDs, it’s an easy joke, and it’s far from perfect. However, it’s 96% effective if done correctly, and 78% effective in practice (because it’s often not done correctly).
Still, many men who resist wearing condoms never learn how to pull out correctly. Apparently, it’s slightly more pleasurable to climax inside a vagina than, say, on their partner’s stomach. Once again, men are willing to risk the life, health, and well-being of women in order to experience a tiny bit more pleasure for roughly five seconds during orgasm.
Think of the choice men are making here. Honestly, I’m not as mad as I should be about this, because we’ve trained men from birth to disassociate sex and pregnancy. We’ve taught them that their pleasure is of utmost importance.
As a general rule, men get women pregnant by having an orgasm. Yes, there are exceptions — it’s possible for sperm to show up in pre-ejaculate — but in most cases, getting a woman pregnant is a pleasurable act for men. But men can get a woman pregnant without her feeling any pleasure at all. It’s even possible for a man to impregnate a woman while causing her excruciating pain, trauma, or horror.
In contrast, a woman can have nonstop orgasms with or without a partner and never once get herself pregnant. A woman’s orgasm has literally nothing to do with pregnancy or fertility — her clitoris exists simply for pleasure, not for creating new humans. No matter how many orgasms she has, they won’t make her pregnant.
Pregnancies happen when men have an orgasm. Unwanted pregnancies happen when men orgasm irresponsibly.
A woman can be the sluttiest slut in the entire world, she can love having orgasms all day and all night long, and she will never find herself with an unwanted pregnancy unless a man shows up and ejaculates irresponsibly. Though our society tends to villainize female pleasure, women’s enjoyment of sex does not equal unwanted pregnancy and abortion. Men’s enjoyment of sex and irresponsible ejaculations do.
Let’s move to the topic of responsibility. Often, men don’t know, don’t ask, and don’t think to ask if they’ve caused a pregnancy. There are often zero consequences for men who cause unwanted pregnancies.
If the woman decides to have an abortion, the man may never even know he caused an unwanted pregnancy with his irresponsible ejaculation. If the woman decides to have the baby, or put the baby up for adoption, the man may never know he caused an unwanted pregnancy with his irresponsible ejaculation either. He may never know there’s now a child walking around with 50% of his DNA.
If the woman does tell him he caused an unwanted pregnancy and that she’s having the baby, the closest thing to a consequence for him is child support. Our current child support system is a well-known joke. Only about 61 percentof required payments by men are actually made, and there are little to no repercussions for skipping out. In some states, failing to pay child support doesn’t even affect your credit.
If a man does pay child support, it doesn’t come close to what is required by a woman in the case of an unwanted pregnancy.
Let’s talk about abortion. When the topic comes up, men might think: Abortion is horrible; women should not have abortions. Never once do they consider the man who caused the unwanted pregnancy.
If you actually care about reducing or eliminating the number of abortions in our country, simply hold men accountable for their actions.
If we’re discussing abortion law — and not how to hold men accountable for irresponsible ejaculations, and the unwanted pregnancies caused by them — we’re wasting our time. Shift the conversation. Stop protesting at clinics. Stop shaming women. Stop debating whether or not to overturn abortion laws. If you actually care about reducing or eliminating the number of abortions in our country, simply hold men accountable for their actions.
What would that look like? A real and immediate consequence for men who cause an unwanted pregnancy. What kind of consequence would make sense? Should it be as harsh, painful, nauseating, scarring, expensive, risky, and life-altering…
… as forcing a woman to go through a nine-month unwanted pregnancy?
If you consider abortion to be murder, consider this thought experiment: Would you be on board with having a handful of men castrated to prevent 600,000 murders each year? If this argument sounds too provocative, could it be that many of us have a hard time wrapping our heads around a physical punishment for men? We seem to be more than fine with physical punishments for women. Perhaps we care more about policing women’s bodies, morality, and sexuality than we do about reducing or eliminating abortions.
Here’s another prevention idea: All males in the U.S. could get a vasectomy when they are ready to be sexually active. Vasectomies are very safe, highly reversible, and about as invasive as a woman getting an IUD implanted. In most cases, there’s some soreness afterwards for about 24 hours, but that’s pretty much it for side effects. (Take a moment to remember that female contraception options, used by millions of women in our country and billions across the world, have well-known side effects which can be brutal and severe — and yes, also include soreness.) If and when a man becomes a responsible adult, finds a mate, and wants to have a baby, the vasectomy can be reversed and then redone once the childbearing stage is over. Each man can bank their sperm before the vasectomy, just in case.
Don’t like my ideas? That’s fine. I’m sure there are better ideas, and I challenge you to suggest your own. My point is we need to stop focusing on women if we’re trying to get rid of abortions. Think of abortion as the “cure” for an unwanted pregnancy. To stop abortions, we need to prevent the “disease” — meaning, the unwanted pregnancy itself. And the only way to do that is by focusing on men, because irresponsible ejaculations by men cause 100% of unwanted pregnancy.
Ask yourselves: What would it take for you to value the life of your sexual partner more than your own temporary pleasure or convenience?
If you’re a man, what would it take for you to never again ejaculate irresponsibly? A loss of money, rights, or freedoms? Physical pain? Ask yourselves: What would it take for you to value the life of your sexual partner more than your own temporary pleasure or convenience?
Men mostly run our government, and men mostly make our laws. In theory, men could eliminate — or drastically reduce — abortions within months without ever touching an abortion law or even mentioning women. They’d simply need to hold men accountable for irresponsible ejaculations, and legislate accordingly.
To reduce or eliminate abortions, stop attempting to control women’s bodies and sexuality. Because unwanted pregnancies are caused by men.
As a mother of six and a Mormon, I have a good understanding of arguments surrounding abortion, religious and otherwise. When I hear men discussing women’s reproductive rights, I’m often left with the thought that they have zero interest in stopping abortion. If you want to prevent abortion, you need to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Men seem unable (or unwilling) to admit that they cause 100% of them.
I realize that’s a bold statement. You’re likely thinking, “Wait. It takes two to tango!” While I fully agree with you in the case of intentional pregnancies, I argue that all unwanted pregnancies are caused by the irresponsible ejaculations of men. All of them.
Don’t believe me?
Let’s start with this: A woman’s egg is only fertile for about two days each month. Yes, there are exceptions, because nature. But one egg which is fertile two days each month is the baseline. And those fertile eggs are produced for a limited number of years. This means, on average, women are fertile for about 24 days per year.
But men are fertile 365 days a year. In fact, if you’re a man who ejaculates multiple times a day, you could cause multiple pregnancies daily. In theory, a man could cause 1000+ unwanted pregnancies in just one year. While it’s true that sperm gets crappier as men age, it doesn’t have a fertility expiration date; men can cause unwanted pregnancies from puberty until death. So, starting with basic fertility stats and the calendar, it’s easy to see that men are the issue here.
As a society, we really don’t mind if women suffer, physically or mentally, as long as it makes things easier for men.
Great question. Modern birth control for women is possibly the most important invention of the last century, and I’m very grateful for it. It’s also brutal. The side effects for many women include migraines, mood swings, decreased libido, depression, severe cramps, heavy bleeding, aneurysm — and that’s just a small fraction of them.
Discouragingly, a promising study on a new male contraceptive was canceled in large part due to… (wait for it)… side effects. To be clear, this list of side effects was about one-third as long as the known side effects for commonly used women’s contraception. There’s a lot to unpack in that story alone. I’ll simply point out that, as a society, we really don’t mind if women suffer, physically or mentally, as long as it makes things easier for men.
But, men, I’ve got good news. Even with the horrible side effects, women are (amazingly!) very willing to use birth control. Unfortunately, it’s harder to get than it should be, but that doesn’t keep women from trying. Birth control options for women require a doctor’s appointment — sometimes multiple doctor’s appointments — and a prescription. They’re not always free, and often not cheap. Some are actually trying to make female birth control options more expensive by allowing insurance companies to refuse to cover them. In addition, contraceptive options for women can’t be easily acquired at the last minute. In most cases, they don’t work instantly.
The pill requires consistent daily use and doesn’t leave much room for mistakes, forgetfulness, or unexpected disruptions to daily schedules. Again, the side effects can be brutal — and not just in rare cases. Despite the hassle and side effects, I’m still grateful for birth control. (Please don’t take it away.)But it’s critical to understand that women’s birth control isn’t simple or easy.
In contrast, let’s look at birth control for men — i.e., condoms. They’re readily available at all hours, inexpensive, convenient, and don’t require a prescription. They’re effective and work on demand, instantly. They don’t cause aneurysms, mood swings, or debilitating cramps. Men can keep them stocked up just in case, so they’re always prepared. They can be easily used at the last minute. I mean, condoms are magic! So much easier than birth control options for women.
As a bonus, most women are totally on board with condoms. They keep us from getting STDs. They don’t lessen our pleasure during sex or prevent us from climaxing. The best part? Cleanup is so much easier — no waddling to the toilet as jizz drips down our legs.
So why would there ever be unwanted pregnancies? Why don’t men just use condoms every time they have sex? Seems so simple, right?
Oh. I remember. Men don’t love condoms. In fact, it’s very, very common for men to pressure women to have sex without a condom. It’s also not unheard of for men to remove the condom during sex without the women’s permission or knowledge. (Pro tip: That’s assault.)
Why would men want to have sex without a condom? Because, for the precious minutes when they’re penetrating their partner, not wearing a condom gives them more pleasure. So… that would mean some men are willing to risk getting a woman pregnant — which means literally risking her life, her health, her social status, her relationships, and her career — so they can experience a few minutes of slightly increased pleasure. Is this for real?
Yes. Yes, it is.
Pregnancies happen when men have an orgasm. Unwanted pregnancies happen when men orgasm irresponsibly.
Imagine a pleasure scale, with pain beginning at zero and going down into the negatives. A good back-scratch falls at 5, and an orgasm without a condom is a 10. Where would sex with a condom fall? A 7 or 8? So, it’s not that sex with a condom is not pleasurable, it’s just not as pleasurable. An 8 instead of a 10.Let me emphasize that again: Men regularly choose to put women at massive risk in order to experience a few minutes of slightly increased pleasure.
For the truly condom-averse, men also have a non-condom, always-ready birth control option built right in: the pull-out. It doesn’t protect against STDs, it’s an easy joke, and it’s far from perfect. However, it’s 96% effective if done correctly, and 78% effective in practice (because it’s often not done correctly).
Still, many men who resist wearing condoms never learn how to pull out correctly. Apparently, it’s slightly more pleasurable to climax inside a vagina than, say, on their partner’s stomach. Once again, men are willing to risk the life, health, and well-being of women in order to experience a tiny bit more pleasure for roughly five seconds during orgasm.
Think of the choice men are making here. Honestly, I’m not as mad as I should be about this, because we’ve trained men from birth to disassociate sex and pregnancy. We’ve taught them that their pleasure is of utmost importance.
As a general rule, men get women pregnant by having an orgasm. Yes, there are exceptions — it’s possible for sperm to show up in pre-ejaculate — but in most cases, getting a woman pregnant is a pleasurable act for men. But men can get a woman pregnant without her feeling any pleasure at all. It’s even possible for a man to impregnate a woman while causing her excruciating pain, trauma, or horror.
In contrast, a woman can have nonstop orgasms with or without a partner and never once get herself pregnant. A woman’s orgasm has literally nothing to do with pregnancy or fertility — her clitoris exists simply for pleasure, not for creating new humans. No matter how many orgasms she has, they won’t make her pregnant.
Pregnancies happen when men have an orgasm. Unwanted pregnancies happen when men orgasm irresponsibly.
A woman can be the sluttiest slut in the entire world, she can love having orgasms all day and all night long, and she will never find herself with an unwanted pregnancy unless a man shows up and ejaculates irresponsibly. Though our society tends to villainize female pleasure, women’s enjoyment of sex does not equal unwanted pregnancy and abortion. Men’s enjoyment of sex and irresponsible ejaculations do.
Let’s move to the topic of responsibility. Often, men don’t know, don’t ask, and don’t think to ask if they’ve caused a pregnancy. There are often zero consequences for men who cause unwanted pregnancies.
If the woman decides to have an abortion, the man may never even know he caused an unwanted pregnancy with his irresponsible ejaculation. If the woman decides to have the baby, or put the baby up for adoption, the man may never know he caused an unwanted pregnancy with his irresponsible ejaculation either. He may never know there’s now a child walking around with 50% of his DNA.
If the woman does tell him he caused an unwanted pregnancy and that she’s having the baby, the closest thing to a consequence for him is child support. Our current child support system is a well-known joke. Only about 61 percentof required payments by men are actually made, and there are little to no repercussions for skipping out. In some states, failing to pay child support doesn’t even affect your credit.
If a man does pay child support, it doesn’t come close to what is required by a woman in the case of an unwanted pregnancy.
Let’s talk about abortion. When the topic comes up, men might think: Abortion is horrible; women should not have abortions. Never once do they consider the man who caused the unwanted pregnancy.
If you actually care about reducing or eliminating the number of abortions in our country, simply hold men accountable for their actions.
If we’re discussing abortion law — and not how to hold men accountable for irresponsible ejaculations, and the unwanted pregnancies caused by them — we’re wasting our time. Shift the conversation. Stop protesting at clinics. Stop shaming women. Stop debating whether or not to overturn abortion laws. If you actually care about reducing or eliminating the number of abortions in our country, simply hold men accountable for their actions.
What would that look like? A real and immediate consequence for men who cause an unwanted pregnancy. What kind of consequence would make sense? Should it be as harsh, painful, nauseating, scarring, expensive, risky, and life-altering…
… as forcing a woman to go through a nine-month unwanted pregnancy?
If you consider abortion to be murder, consider this thought experiment: Would you be on board with having a handful of men castrated to prevent 600,000 murders each year? If this argument sounds too provocative, could it be that many of us have a hard time wrapping our heads around a physical punishment for men? We seem to be more than fine with physical punishments for women. Perhaps we care more about policing women’s bodies, morality, and sexuality than we do about reducing or eliminating abortions.
Here’s another prevention idea: All males in the U.S. could get a vasectomy when they are ready to be sexually active. Vasectomies are very safe, highly reversible, and about as invasive as a woman getting an IUD implanted. In most cases, there’s some soreness afterwards for about 24 hours, but that’s pretty much it for side effects. (Take a moment to remember that female contraception options, used by millions of women in our country and billions across the world, have well-known side effects which can be brutal and severe — and yes, also include soreness.) If and when a man becomes a responsible adult, finds a mate, and wants to have a baby, the vasectomy can be reversed and then redone once the childbearing stage is over. Each man can bank their sperm before the vasectomy, just in case.
Don’t like my ideas? That’s fine. I’m sure there are better ideas, and I challenge you to suggest your own. My point is we need to stop focusing on women if we’re trying to get rid of abortions. Think of abortion as the “cure” for an unwanted pregnancy. To stop abortions, we need to prevent the “disease” — meaning, the unwanted pregnancy itself. And the only way to do that is by focusing on men, because irresponsible ejaculations by men cause 100% of unwanted pregnancy.
Ask yourselves: What would it take for you to value the life of your sexual partner more than your own temporary pleasure or convenience?
If you’re a man, what would it take for you to never again ejaculate irresponsibly? A loss of money, rights, or freedoms? Physical pain? Ask yourselves: What would it take for you to value the life of your sexual partner more than your own temporary pleasure or convenience?
Men mostly run our government, and men mostly make our laws. In theory, men could eliminate — or drastically reduce — abortions within months without ever touching an abortion law or even mentioning women. They’d simply need to hold men accountable for irresponsible ejaculations, and legislate accordingly.
To reduce or eliminate abortions, stop attempting to control women’s bodies and sexuality. Because unwanted pregnancies are caused by men.
Hat Tip: Son_of_Liberty90
Similar threads
