Toxic femininity

Woman stabbed her daughter, 11, to prevent her from having sex, cops say

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/new...a-rivera-daughter-stabbed-20190311-story.html

An Orlando woman stabbed her 11-year-old daughter more than a dozen times Sunday because the girl smiled “different,” causing her mother to think her child was having sex, authorities said.
Michael Williams, Lisa Maria Garza and Gal Tziperman LotanContact Reporters
Orlando Sentinel

Enter your email
Privacy Policy
A woman who stabbed her 11-year-old daughter more than a dozen times Sunday said it was because the girl smiled “different,” causing the mother to think her child was having sex, authorities said.

Rosa Rivera, 28, then drove Aleyda Rivera to Winnie Palmer Hospital, where Rivera was detained by hospital security after wielding a purple-handled pocket knife soaked with blood.

“My baby is gone,” Rivera told first responders, according to her arrest report. Aleyda had 15 stab wounds to her back and a defensive wound to her right arm, authorities said.

“These cases are horrific and tragic,” Orange County Sheriff John Mina said during a Monday afternoon press conference. “And then to know that the child was killed by a mother — basically, a mother is the first line of defense to what is sometimes a very cruel world — is very hard on all of us.”

He urged anyone who knows about domestic violence or abuse to report it to authorities.


Rosa Rivera, 28 (Orange County Jail)
Authorities determined the incident started at a home on the 5700 block of Citadel Drive, where witnesses said Rivera arrived about 7:30 a.m. and began pounding on the door, accusing a man there of having sex with her daughter, deputies said.

The child denied having sex with anyone, the witnesses told authorities. Mina said detectives do not believe the child was being sexually abused, but they are still investigating.


“Based on what we know and what we’ve found so far, we believe that part to be false,” Mina said. “We are doing everything we normally do in those types of allegations, investigations, to unfound that completely.”

According to Mina, detectives believe Rivera stabbed the girl inside the car. Rivera then “drove [Aleyda] around in her vehicle until she ultimately died from those stab wounds.”

In an interview by detectives, Rivera initially denied stabbing her daughter, but eventually admitted to doing it “to prevent her from having sex with other men,” the report said.

“Rivera stated she stabbed her daughter while in the car, and while stabbing her she was attempting to make her more comfortable,” an investigator wrote in an arrest report.

Rivera told deputies she believed her daughter was in heaven.

She told authorities she never saw her daughter having sex, nor did her daughter tell her she was having sex. Rivera had a superficial cut to her arm when she was taken into custody which she said was self-inflicted, according to the report.

Rivera is facing a first-degree murder charge. She’s being held without bail in the Orange County Jail.

Her family answered the door of their Citadel Drive home but declined to speak with an Orlando Sentinel reporter.

“We’re doing OK,” said a male relative who answered the door with two women close behind him. The hunter green one-story home with white trim had a wrought-iron gate with the last name “Rivera” hung in gold letters. A yellow moving truck sat in the driveway.

Rosa Rivera is from Florida but lived in Texas for 12 years before moving to Orlando in December, Orange County Sheriff’s Office Det. Dorothy Rivera said. Rosa Rivera wanted to move into the Citadel Drive home but family members who lived there would not let her, Dorothy Rivera said.

Rosa Rivera had been living with a different family member until a few days ago, deputies said.

She did not answer questions shouted by reporters as she was transferred from the Sheriff’s Office to the Orange County Jail.
 
948040555606913024

4851915983_e4e8a24a9e.jpg
 
Woman stabbed her daughter, 11, to prevent her from having sex, cops say

https://www.orlandosentinel.com/new...a-rivera-daughter-stabbed-20190311-story.html

An Orlando woman stabbed her 11-year-old daughter more than a dozen times Sunday because the girl smiled “different,” causing her mother to think her child was having sex, authorities said.
Michael Williams, Lisa Maria Garza and Gal Tziperman LotanContact Reporters
Orlando Sentinel

Enter your email
Privacy Policy
A woman who stabbed her 11-year-old daughter more than a dozen times Sunday said it was because the girl smiled “different,” causing the mother to think her child was having sex, authorities said.

Rosa Rivera, 28, then drove Aleyda Rivera to Winnie Palmer Hospital, where Rivera was detained by hospital security after wielding a purple-handled pocket knife soaked with blood.

“My baby is gone,” Rivera told first responders, according to her arrest report. Aleyda had 15 stab wounds to her back and a defensive wound to her right arm, authorities said.

“These cases are horrific and tragic,” Orange County Sheriff John Mina said during a Monday afternoon press conference. “And then to know that the child was killed by a mother — basically, a mother is the first line of defense to what is sometimes a very cruel world — is very hard on all of us.”

He urged anyone who knows about domestic violence or abuse to report it to authorities.


Rosa Rivera, 28 (Orange County Jail)
Authorities determined the incident started at a home on the 5700 block of Citadel Drive, where witnesses said Rivera arrived about 7:30 a.m. and began pounding on the door, accusing a man there of having sex with her daughter, deputies said.

The child denied having sex with anyone, the witnesses told authorities. Mina said detectives do not believe the child was being sexually abused, but they are still investigating.


“Based on what we know and what we’ve found so far, we believe that part to be false,” Mina said. “We are doing everything we normally do in those types of allegations, investigations, to unfound that completely.”

According to Mina, detectives believe Rivera stabbed the girl inside the car. Rivera then “drove [Aleyda] around in her vehicle until she ultimately died from those stab wounds.”

In an interview by detectives, Rivera initially denied stabbing her daughter, but eventually admitted to doing it “to prevent her from having sex with other men,” the report said.

“Rivera stated she stabbed her daughter while in the car, and while stabbing her she was attempting to make her more comfortable,” an investigator wrote in an arrest report.

Rivera told deputies she believed her daughter was in heaven.

She told authorities she never saw her daughter having sex, nor did her daughter tell her she was having sex. Rivera had a superficial cut to her arm when she was taken into custody which she said was self-inflicted, according to the report.

Rivera is facing a first-degree murder charge. She’s being held without bail in the Orange County Jail.

Her family answered the door of their Citadel Drive home but declined to speak with an Orlando Sentinel reporter.

“We’re doing OK,” said a male relative who answered the door with two women close behind him. The hunter green one-story home with white trim had a wrought-iron gate with the last name “Rivera” hung in gold letters. A yellow moving truck sat in the driveway.

Rosa Rivera is from Florida but lived in Texas for 12 years before moving to Orlando in December, Orange County Sheriff’s Office Det. Dorothy Rivera said. Rosa Rivera wanted to move into the Citadel Drive home but family members who lived there would not let her, Dorothy Rivera said.

Rosa Rivera had been living with a different family member until a few days ago, deputies said.

She did not answer questions shouted by reporters as she was transferred from the Sheriff’s Office to the Orange County Jail.
Psychotic mother alert.
 
Man Stabbed to Death After Refusing to Fight Back Against Jealous Girlfriend

“It’s as if she uses black magic to keep us together.”

A young woman has been jailed for stabbing her boyfriend to death with a barbecue skewer.

Svetlana Boyarinova, 27, speared Evgeny Solyanik through the chest with the 2-foot-long implement after accusing him of cheating on her. The attack occurred last July at a lakeside picnic in Russia.

Boyarinova was violently jealous and had repeatedly abused Solyanik, 26, in the past, a Cheylabinsk-region court heard. He apparently never fought back, and always denied her accusations of infidelity.

He was said to have told his friends: “It’s as if she uses black magic to keep us together.”

After the stabbing, Boyarinova pulled the skewer out of Solyanki’s chest, and she and a friend took him to a hospital. After he was treated, the group returned to their picnic at Lake Kasargi.

0_PAY-Svetlana-Boyarinova_10_east2west.jpg


https://pluralist.com/man-stabbed-to-death-jealous-girlfriend/
 
WTF is up with Texas Teachers?


Teacher Allegedly Sent 15-Year-Old a Video of Herself Masturbating

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/201...-15-year-old-a-video-of-herself-masturbating/

A Texas high school teacher is on the wrong side of the law after she allegedly sent a 15-year-old student a Snapchat video of herself masturbating.

Suspect-Kelsie-Koepke-640x480.jpg


Police arrested Kelsie Rochelle Koepke, 25, of Katy, Texas, on Wednesday and charged her with one felony count of online solicitation of a minor and one felony count of having an improper relationship with a student in connection with the incident.

Authorities began investigating Koepke, whom officials say worked as a paraprofessional at Paetow High School, on February 28 after a student saw a series of inappropriate social media posts between a 15-year-old classmate and the teacher.

The 15-year-old boy reportedly told investigators that he met Koepke in October 2017 at a school function, where she asked him to add the Snapchat user name “Momma K” to his contact list so they could keep in touch.

A probable cause affidavit alleged that Koepke told the teen not to save their messages, which became sexual over time, KTRK reported.

“Then, on the actual night of the Homecoming event, she sent him the first set of nude photos and videos of herself,” according to the documents.

The documents also stated that Koepke continued to send nude photos and videos of her breasts to the student, until May 1, 2018, when she allegedly sent a Snapchat video to the student of herself masturbating.

Koepke, who is the mother of a six-year-old daughter, surrendered herself to authorities Wednesday. She was released on bond and is due in court on May 7.

The high school released a letter to parents informing them that the school is aware of the situation, and that the school fired her in light of the incident.

“The PHS administration was made aware of the issue through another student who noticed a conversation on social media regarding inappropriate content being shared among the staff member and a student,” the school said in a statement.

“The District took immediate action and removed the paraprofessional from the classroom and later that day the employee was terminated from Katy ISD,” the statement continued
 
Petitions calling for New Zealand prime minister to win Nobel Peace Prize gain over 20,000 signatures

BBUXddA.img


More than 20,000 people have signed petitions calling for New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to win the Nobel Peace Prize for her response to a pair of mosque shootings that killed 50 people.

A change.org petition to the United Nations had gained more than 20,000 signatures as of Sunday morning. A French petition calling for the prime minister to win the prestigious annual award had nearly 3,000 signatures.

"If a Nobel Prize for Peace could be given to a spontaneous statement for wisdom and courage, rather to a person, New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern deserves it," a message on the change.org petition reads.

The statement goes on to praise Ardern for her advocacy on gun control legislation, adding that her "strong leadership after the shootings in Christchurch... could teach a thing or two to other world leaders who at times have come short when tragedy strikes."

Ardern has been praised for how she has responded to the attacks, such as her call to never mention the shooter's name.

"He may have sought notoriety, but we in New Zealand will give him nothing, not even his name," she said.

Last Wednesday, Ardern announced that New Zealand would ban all military-style semi-automatic weapons and all assault rifles in the wake of the shootings.

The ban took effect the same day as the announcement.

"I believe what I have done has not been about leadership. All I have done is simply echoed the humanity of New Zealanders," Ardern said at a tent vigil in Auckland on Saturday, according to Axios.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...atures/ar-BBV9KrO?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=mailsignout
 
In 1969, the salad days of New Left activism, a writer named Carol Hanisch penned an essay that the editor called “The Personal Is Political.” She was seeking to explain the ethos of the women’s therapy sessions she was running. The point was not to improve psychological well being. The point was “political therapy;” that is to motivate people to political action. The idea is that one’s own grievances ought to be turned into political action. “There are no personal solutions at this time,” she wrote. “There is only collective action for a collective solution.”
hellunleashed.jpg

Let’s leave aside the case for or against her brand of politics. The slogan itself was fire. It spread to every cause, every group, every nook and cranny of life. If you experience dissatisfaction in your life, don’t look within for a personal solution; get active, join a collective, and demand a political solution. Think of this as the left-wing application of the Schmittian principle that only through politics do we find meaning (the very opposite point that has become the main theme of Jordan Peterson’s work).
Fifty years later, I’ve been following the meltdown of a number of “social justice” organizations and causes over the past months, as they turn in on themselves, purge themselves of their own self-defined evil and ultimately crumble based on their own inner contradictions. This happenedto the Women’s March. It has happened to the US Congress. It has happened to the most well-funded social justice activist organization in the country. It’s happened in Hollywood, which faces the problem that the more it complies with the identitarian code, the less profitable are its films.
There seems to be no end to the feeding frenzy caused by the politicization of every personal tick. A new entrant into the Democratic Party presidential race cannot even give a public speech without spending the week wailing mea maxima culpa for all the ways in which he violated the canon, however inadvertently. There are no penances sufficient to put one back in the good graces of the moral police of the left.
There are other absurdities, such as the candidate Elizabeth Warren’s alarming dalliance with genetic testing to verify family lore that she is part Native American and thus entitled to sympathy as a victim of oppression. The test not only failed to verify her lore; it produced outrage among tribal groups who clarified that their collective identity is cultural and social, not genetic.
When politics becomes so driven by personal identity that candidates imagine that DNA testing can garner them votes, we’ve reached not a moral high but a low that compares with some of the worst political experiments of the past (see Eugenics).
What’s happening here? The attempt to turn every subjectively felt personal issue into a collective cause with a collective action has hatched a brutal form of identity politics that has generated no end to social conflict, with vast carnage along the way.
[h=3]The Theory Went Wrong[/h] There are many problems with the slogan “the personal is the political” but two stand out. First, personal experience is as diverse as the people on the planet; surely not every personal experience can become a political cause without infinite clashes and contradictions. Second, the plan results in all-consuming state power to the point that you can’t speak, act, or even breathe without bumping into a cop – or a screaming mob.
Both problems have reached their boiling point sometime in the last two years. Surely you have noticed. In the name of justice, equity, and fairness, people are being fired from jobs for utterances or writings from decades ago. The wrong word or look can result in a mob attack and the loss of a career, no matter how successful one happens to be. The spotting of evil is endless and so fast-moving that it is impossible to keep up. Words and phrases that were the height of political compliance just five years ago (“his or her”) are now denounced as oppressively binary.
And the howling attacks against anyone and everyone who dissents is shutting down debate. One dares not take issue with, for example, the pummeling of a prominent person in absence of evidence for fear of doxing and flogging from howling moralists who will exact retribution against you. This explains the many strange pockets of silence on certain topics in the Twittersphere.
[h=3]Impossible Ideals[/h] The moral system being constructed by those who made “personal is political” their mantra has become infinitely complex to the point of being nonoperational. They once said that discrimination is wrong and many people agreed. The trouble is that the law is not a mind reader and so it uses proxies for what it deems to be discriminatory. That means racial and sexual quotas at the least but that’s only the beginning.
To achieve an absolutely even balance in every profession, at every level, not only in position but also in salary, is inconsistent with the actual choices of individuals. So what if those individuals are conscripted by outside observers into a group that the experts believe to be more decisive than mere choice? Instead of mere non-discrimination, the new demand became mandatory diversity.
But a diversity of what? That depends on how you want to slice and dice up the human family based on identity. There is race, sex, age, religion, physical ability, and also sexual preference, language, accent, gender identity, geography, class, and educational background. Maybe you think the diversity mandate should stop at physical biology alone but those too are in dispute (there is no pure race and, more recently, biological sex itself is said to be malleable).
The new additions to the canon include anti-harassment rules based on any of the above categories but that term has no clear definition, no evidentiary rules, no guidelines for compliance, and no statute of limitations. What it means in practice is to have as little human contact with others as possible, especially in a business environment. Literally, anyone can be accused and play-it-safe companies would rather toss out the targetted employee rather than risk bad public relations and an unwinnable lawsuit. The toll adds up daily.
[h=3]Do Not Appropriate[/h] Then most recently the architects of the identitarianism have added another impossible-to-keep law to its canon: you may not appropriate another culture. The intuition here stems from a genuine appreciation for the contributions of a people who deserve some kind of social credit for having made them. But does this mean that no one else may imitate, or be influenced by, another culture for the purpose of celebrating it? Hard to know for sure: we’d better ask official representatives of the culture to tell us. They will probably say no, and accuse you of theft.
The crucial theoretical problem with appropriation theory is that culture is at once malleable and infinitely reproducible at least in its outward appearance. Culture is not inextricably attached to a certain people however you want to identify those collective people, the members of which may or may not appreciate the identification. The crucial historical problem is that it is impossible to think of any point of progress in history that did not depend on appropriating cultural traits from beyond the experience of a small tribe. Follow this logic through far enough and you have to end in condemning all of human experience as inherently exploitative – and many do exactly this
[h=3]Endless War[/h] So let’s put all this together. The demand that we politicize every personal grievance presumes that people only exist as part of groups and those groups must be defined politically and such groupings can be infinitely complex as intersectionality theory demonstrates. One group’s winnings come at the expense of everyone else, and thus does every advance create the conditions for more oppression, disgust, outrage, condemnation, activism, and power grabbing, even as those groups are constantly changing in composition depending on political influence. There is no safety for anyone under this moral code; there is only fear and dread of exposure, and a miserable life overall.


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-28/slogan-unleashed-hell
 
An Arizona court recently ruled that a woman wanting to use her ex-husband’s saved sperm to become pregnant “outweigh[ed]” the man’s desire not to become a father. Due to this court ruling, the man could also be liable for 18 years of child support. In 2014, Ruby Torres was diagnosed with bilateral breast cancer. She was told that after chemotherapy she likely wouldn’t be able to become pregnant. She and her then-boyfriend John Terrell decided to preserve some embryos so that she might one day be able to become a mother.
The couple would eventually marry but then divorced, according to the Arizona Republic. During the divorce, Terrell wanted to make sure Torres couldn’t use the embryos to become pregnant. He brought his case to the Maricopa County Superior Court, who ruled the embryos should go to a third party. Torres appealed, and received a win on March 14.
“The trial court erred when it placed heavy weight on the parties’ inability to 'co-parent,'" Judge Jennifer B. Campbell wrote in a 2-1 decision overturning the lower court’s finding. "Nothing in the record suggests that either of them expected or intended to co-parent any offspring derived from the embryos."


Terrell, it turns out, originally declined to donate his sperm for the embryos, but changed his mind when Torres suggested she would use an ex-boyfriend’s sperm instead. The court ruled that the couple only agreed to preserve the embryos because of the potential for Torres to be unable to conceive in the future, not for the two to co-parent at some point.
In her dissenting opinion, Judge Maria Elena Cruz wrote that Torres and Terrell signed a contract when they preserved the embryos that both parents would have to provide “express, written consent” for the embryos to be used. Torres even testified acknowledging that “we did sign a contract and we agreed to these provisions.”


The court has now ignored that contract, according to Judge Cruz.
“Do contracts matter? I believe they do,” Cruz wrote. “Therefore, because the contract of these parties explicitly prohibits the outcome reached by the majority, and because it is outside our purview to reweigh the evidence, I would affirm the trial court’s judgment, or, in the alternative, remand the matter to the trial court for a new weighing of the parties’ interests.”

More at: https://www.dailywire.com/news/45300/womens-rights-man-forced-allow-ex-use-sperm-get-ashe-schow
 
Eighth-grader pressured me into oral sex, former teacher testifies

https://nypost.com/2019/04/05/eighth-grader-pressured-me-into-oral-sex-former-teacher-testifies/

By Joshua Rhett Miller April 5, 2019 | 11:26am | Updated

A former California middle school teacher claimed in court that she was pressured into giving an eighth-grade student oral sex — because she felt threatened that the boy would expose their relationship if she refused.

Justine Karen Nelson, a married 33-year-old former teacher at Tenaya Middle School in Fresno, testified Wednesday in Fresno Superior Court that she succumbed to pressure to be intimate — including kissing and oral sex — after exchanging nearly 100 pages of Instagram messages with the boy, the Fresno Bee reported.

The student was 13 at the time, while Nelson was a 31-year-old mother of one who has acknowledged knowing their relationship was inappropriate, but felt powerless to stop it due to potentially losing her job and custody of her child.

But a prosecutor disputed that version of events, asking Nelson to show proof the teen threatened her in any way. Nelson replied that she was unable to do so since the coercion happened in person, the newspaper reported.

Nelson testified that the eighth-grader came into her classroom at one point and pushed her onto a desk before kissing her, prompting her to scream his name before the teen ran off. Nelson said she hoped her husband, who also worked at the school as a gym teacher, would hear her scream, but he did not.

When asked if she kissed him back, Nelson admitted it was possible.

“It’s a natural instinct to kiss a child who just pushed you down on a desk?” Deputy District Attorney Liz Owen asked, which Nelson affirmed, the Bee reported.

Nelson also testified that the student incessantly pressured her to give him oral sex. She then gave in to his demands at one point, saying she considered herself out of options.

“I just wanted to get it over with,” an emotional Nelson testified. “I was so sick and tired.”

Nelson denied having romantic feelings for the teen, testifying that she “just cared about him as a person,” according to the newspaper.

The teen, who is now a 16-year-old high school freshman, testified last week that Nelson initiated their relationship and invited him to her classroom, where she kissed him and later gave him oral sex. The sex act occurred several times, he testified, sometimes in the middle of the school day between classes and after school.

Nelson, who is facing felony charges of lewd or lascivious acts with a minor and oral copulation, faces more than eight years in prison if convicted. Closing arguments in the case are expected Monday, the Fresno Bee reports.
 
Eighth-grader pressured me into oral sex, former teacher testifies

https://nypost.com/2019/04/05/eighth-grader-pressured-me-into-oral-sex-former-teacher-testifies/

By Joshua Rhett Miller April 5, 2019 | 11:26am | Updated

A former California middle school teacher claimed in court that she was pressured into giving an eighth-grade student oral sex — because she felt threatened that the boy would expose their relationship if she refused.

Justine Karen Nelson, a married 33-year-old former teacher at Tenaya Middle School in Fresno, testified Wednesday in Fresno Superior Court that she succumbed to pressure to be intimate — including kissing and oral sex — after exchanging nearly 100 pages of Instagram messages with the boy, the Fresno Bee reported.

The student was 13 at the time, while Nelson was a 31-year-old mother of one who has acknowledged knowing their relationship was inappropriate, but felt powerless to stop it due to potentially losing her job and custody of her child.

But a prosecutor disputed that version of events, asking Nelson to show proof the teen threatened her in any way. Nelson replied that she was unable to do so since the coercion happened in person, the newspaper reported.

Nelson testified that the eighth-grader came into her classroom at one point and pushed her onto a desk before kissing her, prompting her to scream his name before the teen ran off. Nelson said she hoped her husband, who also worked at the school as a gym teacher, would hear her scream, but he did not.

When asked if she kissed him back, Nelson admitted it was possible.

“It’s a natural instinct to kiss a child who just pushed you down on a desk?” Deputy District Attorney Liz Owen asked, which Nelson affirmed, the Bee reported.

Nelson also testified that the student incessantly pressured her to give him oral sex. She then gave in to his demands at one point, saying she considered herself out of options.

“I just wanted to get it over with,” an emotional Nelson testified. “I was so sick and tired.”

Nelson denied having romantic feelings for the teen, testifying that she “just cared about him as a person,” according to the newspaper.

The teen, who is now a 16-year-old high school freshman, testified last week that Nelson initiated their relationship and invited him to her classroom, where she kissed him and later gave him oral sex. The sex act occurred several times, he testified, sometimes in the middle of the school day between classes and after school.

Nelson, who is facing felony charges of lewd or lascivious acts with a minor and oral copulation, faces more than eight years in prison if convicted. Closing arguments in the case are expected Monday, the Fresno Bee reports.

So the teen couldn't keep his mouth shut. Now, no more BJs.
 
Monster' fiancee who sent her lover to jail after accusing him of rape was only caught out when dogged detective realised an innocent family snap gave him a cast-iron alibi

A woman whose deceit sent her fiance to jail for a crime he didn't commit was caught out by a detective who couldn't shake the feeling she was lying.

Daniel Jones, 31, spent four-and-a-half months in Goulburn prison, 195km south-west of Sydney, in 2014 after his then fiancee Sarah Jane Parkinson made 32 horrific allegations against him, including rape and domestic violence.

Following her hunch, Detective Sergeant Leesa Alexander was able to discredit several of Parkinson's claims of violence and theft - proving she was a compulsive liar.

'I thought if she's lied to me, perhaps she's lied to the other investigators... my blood ran cold. I was horrified that that may be the case,' Detective Sergeant Alexander said.

Mr Jones' family was forced to pay for his defence after he was falsely charged - leaving them $600,000 in debt, Nine News reported

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...monster-falsely-claimed-fiance-raped-her.html

51494b66b20eaec11fe501f5bdf797f4b41e779b0cb47019c8c687ec3b675ad0.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top