Total RP Pres. Texas votes 69,824 vs RP district14 Total votes 54,111

[ronpaulbillboards]

I was seeing conflicting total numbers that didn't represent the official numbers posted on the forums.

So we are to believe that Ron Paul had 54,111 combined Early and Election day votes for his district 14 Congressional race.

And 69,824 total votes in Texas for president?

This is a blatant travesty and I didn't think it would be this bad and in your face.
He always gets this consistent percentage and it is just a sham and there is no doubt. When you watch the votes come in live, how come there is always a consistent difference between Ron Paul and Huckabee during the whole night while the votes coming in. How can the number separating him from Huck stay the same while total votes are coming in the whole night. It's like a software fix that keeps his votes at a specific percentage as the votes come in no matter what. How come the votes aren't fluid, why do they come in with the same vote difference the whole night. I'm speculating but I just can't see how basically the poll numbers show that his district was the only place that voted for him and the rest of the counties like Austin where the largest base is look like nobody voted.

We passed a resolution in our precinct last night to abolish electronic voting machines for all Republican elections and replace it with paper ballots.

 

[AJ Antimony]

I've always wondered this too. I mean what I never understand is, you NEVER see a completely wild result when they report precinct #1. Like, when they first start posting results you've never seen Paul 25, Rudy 15, McCain 9, Romney 8, Huckabee 3.

Every single time they first post results with 0% reporting, it's always McCain 30, Romney 20, Huckabee 15, Paul 5 or something.

You'd think the numbers would radically change back and forth as numbers came in, yet they remain identical to the 0% report give or take 5 points max.

 

[VoteForRonPaul]

We passed a resolution in our precinct last night to abolish electronic voting machines for all Republican elections and replace it with paper ballots.

I hope this can go through, enough corruption!

 

[DFF]

*shakes head* No doubt about it. Vote fraud at it's finest.

 

[CoreyBowen999]

Could it be that his district only voted him in because he was incumbent?

 

[TruthAtLast]

don't you know.... no one lives in Texas outside of the 14th district.

 

[josh24601]

Could it be that his district only voted him in because he was incumbent?

No, because that would contain too much common sense and lack the requisite conspiracy theory to hold water on this forum. Try again.

 

[ronpaulbillboards]

I've always wondered this too. I mean what I never understand is, you NEVER see a completely wild result when they report precinct #1. Like, when they first start posting results you've never seen Paul 25, Rudy 15, McCain 9, Romney 8, Huckabee 3.

Every single time they first post results with 0% reporting, it's always McCain 30, Romney 20, Huckabee 15, Paul 5 or something.

You'd think the numbers would radically change back and forth as numbers came in, yet they remain identical to the 0% report give or take 5 points max.

don't you know.... no one lives in Texas outside of the 14th district.

The number difference is always the same from 0% to 100% the whole night when you watch it live. I have noticed this since Iowa and it is looks like a software code to me.

It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes that counts!

 

[syborius]

bump

 

[ronpaulbillboards]

This is the largest percent that he won in all his Congressional runs.
So why is his President numbers low.
Why were we so worried about Peden and his so called numbers stating that he was close to beating Dr. Paul.
The MSM was reporting Peden having large poll numbers and they were wrong again.
One thing I do know is that his district has a low number of Diebold electronic machines.

 

[TruthAtLast]

This is the largest percent that he won in all his Congressional runs.
So why is his President numbers low.
Why were we so worried about Peden and his so called numbers stating that he was close to beating Dr. Paul.
The MSM was reporting Peden having large poll numbers and they were wrong again.
One thing I do know is that his district has a low number of Diebold electronic machines.

there is another thread on this. Many believe that because there were no Democrats running against him, the Dems in District 14 voted (and partially saved) Ron Paul because he is better than the NEOCON Peden. Obviously these people wouldn't vote for Ron Paul for President.

 

[FSP-Rebel]

there is another thread on this. Many believe that because there were no Democrats running against him, the Dems in District 14 voted (and partially saved) Ron Paul because he is better than the NEOCON Peden. Obviously these people wouldn't vote for Ron Paul for President.

Maybe you're right, but I know in Mich's open primary you can only vote in one party--not go back and forth.

 

[ronpaulbillboards]

You can't vote for both parties in Texas, once they got a Republican ballot to vote for Paul in the Congressional vote they wouldn't be able to vote Democrat in the National vote. So for that reason I don't think that is happening, If you get a Republican ballot and vote that way, you are a registered Republican for 2 years and you can't vote for a Democrat in the national election in November. Why wouldn't they vote for Ron Paul for pres as well against McCain. I don't see people doing this against one Neo Con candidate and not for the other. And again they would forfeit their Democrat vote in November. I believe you have to vote for the same party when you vote in a primary. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Looking at the official numbers for Travis county (Austin)

So you are telling me that he only received 6905 votes for Austin!!!???

There are RP delegates popping up everywhere in precincts so I know the RP supporters were out in force voting. This is a travesty!

Look at these numbers yourself, just unbelievable.

http://www.co.travis.tx.us/county_clerk/election/20080304/files/RepCume.pdf

 

[jacmicwag]

Could be the party elite was worried Ron would go third party if he lost his seat.

 

[ronpaulbillboards]

Maybe you're right, but I know in Mich's open primary you can only vote in one party--not go back and forth.

You are right, so I don't see Democrats forfeiting their National vote for this but they didn't vote for him for Pres to do the same thing.

Also when I went caucusing last night the line for Democrats was well over 300 people deep. These Democrats are to wrapped up in the Clinton Obama show to be concerned with the Republicans. I almost didn't find the Rep. caucus location which was in a separate building outside in the cold and their were no signs and none of the organizers even said anything about it. I finally had to leave this Dem. line once I figured it out and go and hunt out the Rep. caucus location myself.
All 9 of the delegates selected in my precinct I can almost guarantee are all RP supporters. And this is the case in several precincts that I am aware of around the state. The next phase on March 29th will be interesting, there will be 200 delegates and 200 alternates selected. I'm sure RP delegates will make that cut as well.

 

[ronpaulbillboards]

Could be the party elite was worried Ron would go third party if he lost his seat.

This is too weird, why would it look this obvious

 

[DFF]

there is another thread on this. Many believe that because there were no Democrats running against him, the Dems in District 14 voted (and partially saved) Ron Paul because he is better than the NEOCON Peden. Obviously these people wouldn't vote for Ron Paul for President

This argument doesn't hold water. Ron Paul is wildly popular with people from both parties in Dist 14 because he saves them $$$'s like there's no tomorrow. So there's no way in Hell these numbers are legitimate. If you believe he got stomped out in his own district, with this sort of a disparity, you're living in the land of Oz.

 

[DFF]

This is too weird, why would it look this obvious

Because we live in a land of sheep and the powers that be know this. They know there won't be enough of an outcry from the people calling "Bullshit!" in order to justify not rigging the elections. So to them, the answer to the question of "Should we do it?" is a resounding "Yes!".

 

[ForLiberty-RonPaul]

just so you know....

total District 14 presidential votes = 9071
total Harris county (ALL OF HOUSTON!!!) presidential votes = 9134

wtf?

 

[Catatonic]

I've always wondered this too. I mean what I never understand is, you NEVER see a completely wild result when they report precinct #1. Like, when they first start posting results you've never seen Paul 25, Rudy 15, McCain 9, Romney 8, Huckabee 3.

Every single time they first post results with 0% reporting, it's always McCain 30, Romney 20, Huckabee 15, Paul 5 or something.

You'd think the numbers would radically change back and forth as numbers came in, yet they remain identical to the 0% report give or take 5 points max.

There was a long thread a few months ago made mostly by people who claimed to be programmers discussing how the way the results play out looks extremely similar to a computer program.

I'm no programmer but I hope people understand the extremely unlikely odds of the results maintaining roughly the same percentage for even 1 candidate through the entire count.

And then I hope they remember all the cases of media reporting the results with 0 or 1% reporting.